|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-24-2002, 03:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
PoiSEO.com
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PoiSEO.com
Posts: 1,201
|
Article about HTML optimization
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:04 AM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Right Behind You !!
Posts: 309
|
Good article SpyCam.... now if I can get someone to do all that for me
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:05 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Са́нкт-Петербу́рг
Posts: 10,945
|
Bandwidth is cheap, I cant imagine anyone being so hard up to save on a few bytes.
Whether my page is 40k or 39.3k, its not worth the effort. IMHO. And even if it loaded faster, the difference caused by those amounts of bytes less would not even be noticable. Good article though. Those webmasters who are like obsessive martha stewart style webmasters will like it. |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:08 AM
|
#4 |
|
aspiring banker
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: toronto
Posts: 10,870
|
ya the last thing i wanna do is go through a zillion pages
i'd rather build an extra site and make double the money i'd save in bandwidth.  good article tho |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 2,292
|
Install mod_gzip to the server and save 80% of bw WITHOUT html optimalization....
http://www.i4net.tv/marticle/get.php...e&articleid=12 |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:08 AM
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Right Behind You !!
Posts: 309
|
Well, if your site is doing 2 or 300K in traffic each day and you shave off 5k from the file size... it could add up pretty quick.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:10 AM
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,693
|
mod_gzip
__________________
<a href="http://www.adultcontent.co.uk">Adult Content UK - Great British Content</a> |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:17 AM
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
|
If you delete the letter "e" everywhere it appears on all of your webpages, you could save up to 2k per day on a 100mps site.
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:36 AM
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: cloud number 9
Posts: 4,396
|
>> Delete all " and # symbols because the pages look perfect without them - they are ballast >>
try it in netscape and we'll talk about after... i'm not a NS fan but i don't want to lose my 5-6% users that are using it. I think the best HTML optimization you can achieve when you're using external CSS files. eg: instead of <TABLE WIDTH="100%" CELLPADDING="5" CELLSPACING="0"> you put an <table class="tab1"> instead of <FONT SIZE="2" COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="VERDANA"> you put an <div class="fnt1"> etc... of course class1 and tab1 are defined in the .css file.
__________________
SEO Mogul | ICQ: 163671223 |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2002, 04:59 AM
|
#10 |
|
old school fart
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,015
|
Not just netscape, but numerous other browsers out there require proper html. search engines are even starting to pay more attention to things such as properly using the new standard of <strong> against <b>
__________________
The next generation of SEO |
|
|
|
