Not sure, but the most popular internet sites (nastydollars) feature European ant-eaters almost exclusively. Fans and women seem to eat it up.

I think its one of the most retarded things someone said to me EVER: "You are just mad because they didnt cut your dick" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

ur dick is smaller then it was supposed to be ... sucks does not it :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

It's funny to see the question "Why most Western Males are UNCIRCUMCISED?" when actually a correct question is "Why most Middle East Males are CIRCUMCISED?"

The answer is already given in this thread. Circumcision makes a lot of sense in territories where water is scarce and you cannot wash your dick often enough. And the tradition comes from those territories exactly. It was not known in ancient western Europe at all. Jews spread it out later.


"The direct medical benefits of neonatal circumcision are still under debate, with various studies reaching different opinions.".

There are risks and benefits which you can learn here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision


I can add that some time ago in USSR was a theory that an appendicitis is an atavism and is not required anymore, it only causes problems so it must be removed soon after birth, as a big percentage of people have problems with it and have to get it removed lated when it's not that easy as in early childhood. And they start removing it from newborns in some places. It resulted in serious health consequences in those kids later and they had to stop this practice.

Personally I don't think it's a good idea to mess with what was there from a nature, unless there are some serious reasons for this. Which, as I admit, are for a circumcision in those dry territories...

Dont make him feel worse than he already does man :1orglaugh

Hes trying so hard to pretend hes really happy with his dick cut in half and pretending people who didnt get their dick cut are upset and wish they were like him.

Yawn. You are seriously pathetic.

Not a day goes by i don't wish i still had my skin. In a lifetime I'd save hundreds of thousands of dollars on lube, lotion, spit, shampoo, etc..... SKIN RULEZ!

btw, I've seen videos of circumcisions... that is, i started to watch one, but didn't get more than a few seconds in. It's barbaric

Your first post is whining about no foreskin. Welcome to GFY :1orglaugh

It really boils down to the concept of adults having the right to mutilate their child.

Regardless of the minor difference caused by circumcision, it's alarming that in this day and age people defend the right of parents to mutilate their male children, but like I said twice already, the abused become the abusers. It's a kind of Stockholm Syndrome.

I think most American chicks prefer circumsized dicks to non. I guess its coz thats what they are used to. Whereas in Europe its different.

To each their own but just coz you aint had the snip doesn't means its not clean. I'm not cut and I keep my dick clean.

Sorry dude, but Franck has owned you hands down in this thread.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Coming from you i dont take that too seriously.

Oh wait, im just mad because i still have my dick intact :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I agree with that. At least for the western countries. The benefits of circumcision are not that clear for those countries and the risks are always certain.

If someone want to circumcise himself in order to have better sex (let's suppose it's true) it can do it later on his own will. I have nothing aginst this as logn as it's man's own choise.

Some even insert things into their penises, you know...

most western parents are enlightened enough to not want to torture their children at such a young age. :2 cents:

You are a fucking idiot. Attempting to put thoughts in my head is hardly owning shit.

Watch Franck explode everyone.

"Answer
I read this correspondence with interest. I am English and circumcision now is rare in England. When I was born in the 1930's it was fairly common, about 50/50 and I was not circumcised at birth. My mother told me she had consulted our doctor and he didn't believe in it. I always wished I was circumcised and finally had it done at the age of 40 at my own request. There was nothing wrong with my penis, I just preferred the circumcised look. I think it was the best decision I ever took and everything repeat everything is so much better. I find that so many Americans because they were routinely circumcised at birth think they are missing something wonderful. Believe you me guys you are not! From my experience most women prefer a circumcised man, many will not do oral with uncut men because of the unpleasant stink and smegma. I am afraid many men in the UK never wash their penises and there are many that have not been able to retract their foreskins since birth! This should never happen. No doubt I will get a lot of abuse from the anti-circumcision brigade but I can only go on my own experience and repeat that since I was circumcised everything is so much better. Greetings from England "

it's more 'lamenting'. really, but thanks :winkwink:

Answer
Well up until the age of 26 i was uncircumcised, at the age of 24/25 i wanted to be circumcised i don`t know why and where this thought had come from i had 2 friends from school and uni that i knew were circumcised and i casually bought this up with them and asked them what it was like, one had been circumcised at birth and the other at the age of 11.

I talked it over with my girlfriend and told her what i thought and over time i plucked up enough courage to visit my doctor but because i wasnt suffering any foreskin related problems he didn`t really want to know.

Reading a magazine i came a cross a advert for a private clinic where they did amongst other things male circumcision,I decided that was for me so i talked again with my GF and she said how about a private hospital so the next morning she phoned the local private hospital and i was circumcised at the Lakeland Hospital.

Now at the age of 31 i think the circumcision was the best thing that happened to me, we have 3 children and our 17month old son is circumcised.

Sex is incredible i last longer, my penis is far easier to keep clean especially when or if we have summer, My wife prefers my circumcised look.

Answer
Most women I know prefer circumcised males. I met a man a few months ago and I care deeply about him, but he's not circumcised and it is a problem. The texture of the foreskin is strange-it feels like a rubber glove. I thoroughly enjoy men's bodies and giving oral sex, but it seems like so much more work than it is with a circumcised male. I also feel like the foreskin is some sort of separate entity which keeps me from really touching "him." I'm trying to not let this ruin the relationship, because he's such a great guy.

Answer
I prefer circumsised guys.... iprefer the look. Uncircumsised jsut makes me feel sick i dunno why, the foreskin just looks nasty. Im from the UK and a lot of people here are not circumsised, but its always nicer when they are

Now I know what to get Franck for Christmas :1orglaugh


http://www.imagefilez.com/out.php/i49891_guillotine.gif

Answer

First of all, it is a myth created by uncircumsized men in the age of circumsision that sex is less pleasurable when you're un-circumsized. That's just something invented to help the feel better about the fact that the majority of North AMerican girls don't like it when guys are wearing a turtle neck. The penis is, in fact, more sensitive during sex for circumsized men. Secondly, the difference isn't so huge that you should worry about it. Thirdly, when a man gets circumsized after he's full grown it is, of course, very painful, and, worse, half of the penis is a a darker colour than the other half, and that doesn't look so hot... you'll find this look sometimes in porn, since all that skin doesn't go over so well in adult films. Finally, don't worry about what that girl said. It's true that most women don't like the skin... it is cumbersome to deal with, and tastes and smells get trapped under there, making it less pleasant to perform oral sex on a man. Also, it isn't as pleasing to the eye. HOWEVER, women get used to it, and if they care about the man at all, they forget about it, and it becomes attractive, at least on an individual basis. Also, statistics say that there is a renaissance in non-circumsision (which i know i'm spelling wrong!!), and now only about 30% of babies are being given the procedure routinely. So don't worry about it. To each their own... you just need to find a chick who doesn't mind... take it from a girl who has had plenty of experience with both. It used to repluse me, and i still prefer it bare, but the man that I love has a hat, and all i want to do is make love with him, piggy in a blanket or not! ;-)

Since you seem to get things topsy-turvy, being called a 'fucking idiot' by you is like being called a 'stand up guy' by Einstein.

So thanks.








































You still got owned though.

This was not speculation, this was a situation where if he did not get it cut off it would prevent him from peeing which in turn would kill him from toxins in his body..are you fucking kidding me...I didnt do it to mutilate him, I did it to save his life you ignorant fuck . I tried to go the natural route.. this was my ordeal and experience with it. :321GFY :321GFY

Perhaps some of the mutilation-supporters think that parents should have the right to insert metal rings and ballbearings into their baby sons' cocks as well.

Circumcision threads are always hilarious. Amazing how pissy you people get about this.

I'm cut. Frankly I don't care either way.

Africa has a serious, serious AIDS problem. Any method they can implement I'm all for. Millions of children without mothers and fathers.

I read somebody in this thread say "yeh, circumcision only prevents AIDS up to 60%, that means people will be even less careless!" Yeh, and condoms aren't 100% either. So lets do nothing and hope nobody has sex. Problem solved.

So, you would circumcise your other male children whether they need it or not based on one experience? Or did I read that wrong?

your using it as an example to defend a practice that makes no more sense than removing a childs ears to avoid infection. obviously, if its a procedure thats a solution to a medical problem, thats one thing. suggesting there is a significant risk of medical problems (or life threatening medical problems) by not doing it is simply incorrect and unfounded.

Mine wasn't so health threatning as your sons. I really have no memory of having foreskin at 5. I had to get it as per my mother because my foreskin was growing over.

I've dated a few girls that have told me they only sleep with guys who are cut. I quite enjoy mine this way.

No dude, it PISSES YOU OFF that you are cut. You can't stand it so you just had to post.

I did and it was my Husbands decision more than mine, he didnt want his child to go through what my other one did .

My first I didnt, my 2nd I didnt and it went all wrong.. the 3rd I did. My middle son is 17 and he has told me that he is glad he got it done and he doenst have an "ugly" penis. I will make sure I ask my youngest son when he is old enough what his opinions are.

No dude, you are really PISSED OFF yours is cut. Just ask Franck.

Funny how you own yourself again :1orglaugh

If you think that is stupid then really how stupid is "you are angry because you are not cut" as you claim :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Fucking retarded fuck.

That shit broke my heart.. when little man went to get his "plastibell" off.. the doctor ripped it off including the skin that was growing back to it..the doctor was an asshole and told my little guy to shut up and grow up. He walked funny for a week or two..I hated it! :(

Dance around your ignorant claims you retarded fucking monkey. As somone else pointed back at the beginning of this thread, why the fuck do you care? The only reason you post in here is you hate the fact that circumcised people and their women love their dick. You have to try and shove your bullshit opinion down our throats as if it were our own. You are wrong as usual.

What ignorant claims cocksucker? That my dick is clean and women have no problem with is whatsoever? Oh yeah, thats sooooo ignorant :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

i always thought the majority of western males were circumsized. at least from the early 1900's to 1980's. i don't see why people get so pissy at this topic. people will have their own viewpoints, as they always have. and comparing it to removing your ears and your eyes is just stupid. compare it to something at least a bit less extreme so you don't see like you obviously have personal issues with it. like for example wisdom teeth. they come in handy to help you chew food but you don't *really* need them. the foreskin protects the head, but you aren't going to be disabled without it.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dude, i live in Holland. A civilized country where parents dont mutilate their children. Girls arent looking for cut dick here. Get a fucking clue you imbecile with your tiny dick.

Dude i dont give a rats ass if people still have their dick or if its cut in half but please dont come acting all superior and all women love me bullshit because youre missing some skin :1orglaugh

Im sure most people live fine with the fact that they are cut but that ninja dude obviously has problems with it and does everything he can to make himself *think* that he is better than others.

Speaking as a woman and not a mother, I PREFER circumcised to uncircumcised..its just better all the way around ..I wouldnt hold it against you if you had foreskin, but you wouldnt be getting a blowjob from me if we hooked up..just my opinion