![]() |
Quote:
I won't quibble over usage of the word "small". I suppose one of my points could be that our slave issue compared to your slave issue is insignificant at best. The U.S. suffers it's legacy of slavery to this day with racial issues and hatred. Canada's slavery issue was resolved nearly 100 years before yours was, and today we pretty much have no racial issues where blacks are concerned. Canadians are very much mostly non-prejudiced peoples. We do, however, share a common heritage with the U.S. when it comes to Native Americans. |
Quote:
The South didnt have a huge population, and thats one of the reasons is used slaves for labor. The north was the industrial hub, and the south was the cotton / agricultural area. There was significantly less population. http://lcweb.loc.gov/exhibits/african/reynomap.jpg Heres a map for you. It was a small group of people that owned slaves. You think every white guy in the South owned one? Hell no. |
Quote:
That's what was offred to them in Camp David 2000 and Arafat rejected it. You should listen both to what Clinton and Bush said about it. |
But Rat, there were also a lot of pro-slavery types living in the North at the time. The issue was far from "black & white" <img SRC="http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/biggrin.gif">
In relation to the entire U.S. population then yes, the south was relatively small in comparison. So what? Look up how many thousand people died in your war that was an attempt to resolve the issue. It didn't reslove it of course though. It officially served to abolish slavery, but it did nothing to fix the problem of what to do with the 3 million+ slaves that you had dragged over from Africa. A lot of white folks down there said "<i>HELL's FIRE! War or no war, no nigga's gonna live on MY street! Nobody's gonna tell ME thet a nigga is equal tuh ME!</i>" And that pea-brained mentality lives on in parts of the U.S. to this day. |
Quote:
|
And it doesn't matter if only a few hundred thousand folks owned slaves. The fact is that a few milliion U.S. citizens in the huge region known as the "South" were willing to fight to defend the institution of slavery. An area that is bigger and was more populace than many entire countries at the time.
Your "small" argument holds no water Lab, because it was by no means a small issue in the U.S. like it was in Canada. |
Quote:
In the mid 1800s cotton was the export that accounted for over half the GDP at the time. The South saw the North getting more influence in Washington (because they had more people... more voters) and they knew in a matter of time that the North would dictate the laws of the South. THATS why they wanted to leave the Union. Leave the Union? They would have taken over half the countries wealth with them. The Civil War was not over slavery. Thats bullshit. The North used it as an excuse... and not even a very good one. |
Quote:
|
Your points about the civil war are of course valid and accurate.
My point that there is no comparison between the slavery issues in Canada as opposed to the U.S. is also valid. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To demolish all settlements weren't in the plan, the plan was to give palestinians israeli land in exchange of keeping settlements. Basicly shittie land was offered and the palestinians did not accept it. The refugees right to return was not discussed seriously, if i'm correct the only countries in the world that don't respect the refugees right to return home are Israel and US. Plus more... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Color it however you like. One Canuck said Canadians didnt oppress black people. I showed they did. There wasnt even any need to argue it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Okay, fair enough. As I pointed out, we resolved our issue nearly 100 years before you did. Not only that, but during your vast decades of legal slave ownership, where did your runaway slaves run to for safe haven?
That's right Rat. Your favorite country and mine.... Canada. |
Quote:
If they chose to go to Canada, that was their decision. Why do you think Detroit is so black in an otherwise white area? Cmon CD... you can do better than this. |
Quote:
Because tageted killing of innocent civilians if just wrong how would you feel if that was your family |
Quote:
You would find that surprising? I am amazed the Palestinians took it this long. |
Quote:
|
Bunch of idiots armed to the teeth?
Sounds like the US :winkwink: |
Quote:
The wheel continues to turn. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So don't you think that jews are now being a *tad* hypocritical? The jews set an example. Viscious terrorism gets you what you want. That's just what the palestiens are doing now. You set the standard for terrorism, and are now crying about it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am saying... do not be surprised when after you take someone elses land (and decide to live on it), they will do mean things to you. If someone takes my house and occupies it and then takes my ability to work... I am going to wait for his kids on the playground and hit them with a can of gasoline. I dont think he should be surpised by the reaction. |
Quote:
Whoa! The last thing we need here in the states is more religious zealots.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Admit it, when it comes to this issue there is no comparison between the Slave/racial horrors of the two counties. Canada comes out so far ahead you can't even see us on the horizon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ok
but it's common knowledge especially here in the UK because it was recently the queen's ten-millionth julilee (or whatever) there were tons of documentaries about the fall of the british empire (very interesting stuff) and there was quite a detailed section about britain 'owning' palestine, and then all the jews came over after WWII and then the fighting between them began, and all the terrorism *by jews* against the british ... and soon enough the british said "fuck this for a laugh" and left. That's probably where the US took over. and the situation hasn't exactly improved since then forgetting all this 'holy land' bollocks, the jews were given loads of choice about where they wanted their own country, and if I remember rightly were offered some really nice areas/islands. But no, they had to move to where they were surrounded by arabs, and to an area where historically jews and arabs are constantly at each other's throats. Ever heard of making life easy for yourself? These people obviously haven't. |
I'd rather that 'my girlfriend was a dialer' than read this discussion.
The venting and anti semitism being written is disgusting. :mad: Shame.:mad: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
When the US took over Palestine?:1orglaugh :1orglaugh Go back to school man, or may be you are still in the second grade? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
that's right
anti israel is the new form of anti-semitism. two years a go palestine started a terror war agiants israel, media is just an other front, palestians use anti israel propganda, promoting the idea that israel should be banned of the comunity of nations, as well as promoting the daily murders of innocent israelies and jews all over the world. We're are dealing here with the same fundumuntel islam, that usa, and eventually europe will have to deal with, and like you fought the nazis, we have to fight and win this war with all means we have militarty and economically. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123