Video evidence of US tactical nukes in Iraq - GoFuckYourself.com

Matt 26z · 10-21-2006, 01:04 AM

I was skeptical at first, but it's there.

3:56

Massive white flash and then mushroom cloud.

http://www.halturnershow.com/Tactica...tedInIraq.html

Also of interest is that when the Iraq war first broke out, they hit one of Saddam's bunkers and claimed to have destroyed it. The maker of that bunker stated that the only way to penetrate it was by using a tactical nuke. Are we seeing such a weapon in the video?

After Shock Media · 10-21-2006, 01:25 AM

Ummm you do realize that they were targeting an ammo dump right?
Just because an explosion is suddenly larger and produces a mushroom cloud, it does not mean a nuke. Specially if they are bombing AMMO for gawds sake.

Plus this is Baghdad right? Umm where are the people that would be getting radiation sickness and burns? Remember the press was there from the onset.

JOHNNY_BUTTHOLES · 10-21-2006, 01:25 AM

damn. but it reads as if the nuke when off when the ammo dump caught fire. they didn't drop a bomb.

sacX · 10-21-2006, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOHNNY_BUTTHOLES

damn. but it reads as if the nuke when off when the ammo dump caught fire. they didn't drop a bomb.

yeah they didn't drop a bomb, an American ammo dump caught fire or was attacked.

notabook · 10-21-2006, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Plus this is Baghdad right? Umm where are the people that would be getting radiation sickness and burns? Remember the press was there from the onset.

Tac nukes do allow for quite a bit of variability in energy output, the smaller ones probably wouldn't produce radiation sickness/burns to effect much of the surrounding area. Still, no way they used a damn nuke in Iraq lol... USA doesn't want to be known as the monster that used the bomb twice.

sacX · 10-21-2006, 01:36 AM

what the fuck is that website about it has an ad "for whites" only webhosting.

"In order to have your web site hosted by us, you need to be a straight, white, non-jew. If you meet these basic criteria, you _may_ qualify for membership in our club and for our service. "

Zorgman · 10-21-2006, 01:39 AM

Impressive to see. Bad for the people around it.

After Shock Media · 10-21-2006, 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook

Tac nukes do allow for quite a bit of variability in energy output, the smaller ones probably wouldn't produce radiation sickness/burns to effect much of the surrounding area. Still, no way they used a damn nuke in Iraq lol... USA doesn't want to be known as the monster that used the bomb twice.

If that was the case then why when I am gunna get an MRI or something, do they cover my head and jewels in a lead blanket, inject me with some odd fluid in a strange metal vial, while wearing what appear to be lead lined flak jackets and then retreat behind a one foot wall and use a microphone to talk to me?

I think even a small nuke would cause radiation issues with people.

u-Bob · 10-21-2006, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Just because an explosion is suddenly larger and produces a mushroom cloud, it does not mean a nuke. Specially if they are bombing AMMO for gawds sake.

what he said.

notabook · 10-21-2006, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

If that was the case then why when I am gunna get an MRI or something, do they cover my head and jewels in a lead blanket, inject me with some odd fluid in a strange metal vial, while wearing what appear to be lead lined flak jackets and then retreat behind a one foot wall and use a microphone to talk to me?

I think even a small nuke would cause radiation issues with people.

MRI’s don’t use radiation, they use a strong magnetic field w/radiofrequency waves. They like to use those on your junk so that future little bob doles and calista flockharts can be born. X-rays and stuff like that… they are focused radiation so I guess they want to be more cautious (but I’d say this has a lot more to do with lawsuits than anything else). Brief exposure to x-rays only account for 15 or 16% of annual exposure to the average person from radiation, over 50% of the radiation we are exposed to yearly comes out from the ground in form of radon gas.

While I’ll agree getting an x-ray would be much safer than any tactical nuke the tinier nukes are only 100 sticks of TNT in energy output, there’s simply no way something that small is going to cause much fallout. Sure it’ll be detectable (as the area exposed will be in the thousands of times greater than ambient radiation) but its ability to harm human life is going to be extremely minimal minus the intended area it blows up at.

After Shock Media · 10-21-2006, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook

MRI?s don?t use radiation, they use a strong magnetic field w/radiofrequency waves. They like to use those on your junk so that future little bob doles and calista flockharts can be born. X-rays and stuff like that? they are focused radiation so I guess they want to be more cautious (but I?d say this has a lot more to do with lawsuits than anything else). Brief exposure to x-rays only account for 15 or 16% of annual exposure to the average person from radiation, over 50% of the radiation we are exposed to yearly comes out from the ground in form of radon gas.

Im tired, no fair. It is also why I said or something such as x-rays or catscans. And again no fair, its its like 3:20 am here and my brain is sort of off so leave logic out of this will you.

DBS.US · 10-21-2006, 03:31 AM

Check out there web host
http://www.privatewebhosting.org/

notabook · 10-21-2006, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Im tired, no fair. It is also why I said or something such as x-rays or catscans. And again no fair, its its like 3:20 am here and my brain is sort of off so leave logic out of this will you.

You said CATscans

Three kittens shall now die horrible, horrible deaths.

Naughty-Pages · 10-21-2006, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook

USA doesn't want to be known as the monster that used the bomb twice.

Technically we did use it twice...
Hiroshima and Nagasaki

But I don't think that was a nuke, it would have been all over the news with Bush saying "I told you so" LOL

crockett · 10-21-2006, 07:19 AM

It was an ammo dump.. umm humm what is storred there? A whole bunch of shit that blows up..

This is a video of a fire works factory (think it was in Holland)..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...losion&hl =en

notice the large explosion at the end that killed the camera man and several others?.. Yea those damn dutches used nukes too..

Tip of the day.. gun powder goes boom boom.

crockett · 10-21-2006, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

Check out there web host
http://www.privatewebhosting.org/

LOL guess they aren't biased in any way on who they host..

Quote:

Private Web Hosting
"a private membership organization for straight, white, non-jews"

Lazonby · 10-21-2006, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

Check out there web host
http://www.privatewebhosting.org/

Lazonby · 10-21-2006, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

I was skeptical at first, but it's there.

3:56

Massive white flash and then mushroom cloud.

http://www.halturnershow.com/Tactica...tedInIraq.html

Also of interest is that when the Iraq war first broke out, they hit one of Saddam's bunkers and claimed to have destroyed it. The maker of that bunker stated that the only way to penetrate it was by using a tactical nuke. Are we seeing such a weapon in the video?

By the way, you're a simpleton for believing it.

LittleMack · 10-21-2006, 07:32 AM

nope, that was just a flash fire from the ammo dump blowing up

Lazonby · 10-21-2006, 07:38 AM

IF YOU BELIEVE THAT EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY AND THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT IS EVIL AND YOUR ENEMIES ARE REALLY YOUR FREINDS IT JUST MEANS YOU ARE OPEN MINDED

Grapesoda · 10-21-2006, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Ummm you do realize that they were targeting an ammo dump right?
Just because an explosion is suddenly larger and produces a mushroom cloud, it does not mean a nuke. Specially if they are bombing AMMO for gawds sake.

Plus this is Baghdad right? Umm where are the people that would be getting radiation sickness and burns? Remember the press was there from the onset.

+ every reporter in the fucking world is there . . be a great place to try and sneak in tactical nukes

jimthefiend · 10-21-2006, 09:06 AM

A can of spray paint tossed into a campfire produces a mushroom cloud. Nukes arent the only things that make those, ya know.

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 09:11 AM

BoyAlley · 10-21-2006, 09:18 AM

Just FYI burning and/or blowing up a nuclear weapon will not cause it to detonate.

I watch the discovery science channel

Splum · 10-21-2006, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

I was skeptical at first, but it's there. 3:56 Massive white flash and then mushroom cloud. http://www.halturnershow.com/Tactica...tedInIraq.html Also of interest is that when the Iraq war first broke out, they hit one of Saddam's bunkers and claimed to have destroyed it. The maker of that bunker stated that the only way to penetrate it was by using a tactical nuke. Are we seeing such a weapon in the video?

So how long have you been muslim Matt26z? Or are you simply an insurgent sympathizer who likes to spread terrorist propaganda?

Either that or you are a gullible fucking idiot who doesnt do any research on the information he is being spoon fed by his liberal nut rubbing buddies.

Bunker buster bombs made entirely from conventional explosives create MUSHROOM clouds lol.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t icleId=2209

Juilan · 10-21-2006, 09:58 AM

Well, Bush has gone on record stating he would use tactical nukes on on Iraq, Iran and N. Korea even if it was pre-emptive. So all one has to do is read cnn.com to conclude that it's a possibility reagrdless of what side of the polictial fence your on.

Don't think this video is convincing evidence though.

Webby · 10-21-2006, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

I was skeptical at first, but it's there.

3:56

Massive white flash and then mushroom cloud.

http://www.halturnershow.com/Tactica...tedInIraq.html

Also of interest is that when the Iraq war first broke out, they hit one of Saddam's bunkers and claimed to have destroyed it. The maker of that bunker stated that the only way to penetrate it was by using a tactical nuke. Are we seeing such a weapon in the video?

It's very hard to say on nuke weaponary Matt, but seriously doubt this was one. Other than massive core damage estimated up to a $1 billion, deaths and further damage to the surrounding area, - there does not appear to be changes (other than those expected) in atmospheric readings in the area. Camp Falcon is a well-monitored region right now - not just by the US

But... until otherwise proven, there is plenty reason to question any aspect over Iraq - elements of "occupying forces" are not exactly known for truth, but have a track record of deviation, lying and torture and little doubts they have used chemical devices (skin burning agents) to a level. The admin have already indicated they have a mental sanity imbalance and declared they will use nuclear weapons in that region - and elsewhere.

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 11:10 AM

if that aint a nuke then there is no such thing as a nuke.

fuck the mushroom cloud! Nothing produces that kind of flash except a nuke!

Period.

You can blow up all the TNT you can find without getting that kind of flash.

That was a "light bulb flash"; regular munitions would have created a flamed flash that would have lasted much longer. Flames dissipate much slower than nuclear fusion.

I stand on my training as an NBC officer in the US military at The US Army Chemical School at Fort McClellan in Aniston Alabama!
NBC stands for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical.

It was a tactical nuke!

End of fucking story.

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

It was an ammo dump.. umm humm what is storred there? A whole bunch of shit that blows up..

This is a video of a fire works factory (think it was in Holland)..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...losion&hl =en

notice the large explosion at the end that killed the camera man and several others?.. Yea those damn dutches used nukes too..

Tip of the day.. gun powder goes boom boom.

Sorry buddy, that dutch explosion is nothing at all like the one in the Iraq video. Here's some advice...stop claiming you know someting that you have no experience with at all.

The fireball in the dutch explosion is clearly not a nuke. The cloud formed is in no way similar to that of a nuke or of the Iraq video.

Consider that the simple possesion of a tac nuke in Iraq is not any indication that it would have been used. It's just a case of "take all the fucking guns so if we need them they will be there".
This is nothing unusual. Naive people just can't phathom that the pure, innocent US would do such a thing. Get the fuck over the nice pure country bullshit...our troops are commting rapes and murders over there and Bush is willing to do what ever he can get away with to win this one.

Grapesoda · 10-21-2006, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

if that aint a nuke then there is no such thing as a nuke.

fuck the mushroom cloud! Nothing produces that kind of flash except a nuke!

Period.

You can blow up all the TNT you can find without getting that kind of flash.

That was a "light bulb flash"; regular munitions would have created a flamed flash that would have lasted much longer. Flames dissipate much slower than nuclear fusion.

I stand on my training as an NBC officer in the US military at The US Army Chemical School at Fort McClellan in Aniston Alabama!
NBC stands for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical.

It was a tactical nuke!

End of fucking story.

that may be but you don't know shit about photography . . that's over exposed and that's about all she wrote . . sorta like when the tinfoil hat crown showed pics of the shuttle crashing with blue fringe around the edges . . death rays? hardly, chromatic aberrations . . now yer trying to say an over exposed segment of video is a nuclear explosion . . get real dude . .

Splum · 10-21-2006, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

if that aint a nuke then there is no such thing as a nuke. fuck the mushroom cloud! Nothing produces that kind of flash except a nuke! Period.

Lol except a camera.

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wanton

that may be but you don't know shit about photography . . that's over exposed and that's about all she wrote . . sorta like when the tinfoil hat crown showed pics of the shuttle crashing with blue fringe around the edges . . death rays? hardly, chromatic aberrations . . now yer trying to say an over exposed segment of video is a nuclear explosion . . get real dude . .

You must not be too bright to not know that video is DIGITAL and does not "over expose" like film.

Dude, give up the dumb shit. America is evil and the reat of the world knows it.

Pleasurepays · 10-21-2006, 11:41 AM

once again, the brave and courageous folks at www.somefuckingcrazyidiot.com exposed the worlds darkest secrets before anyone else.. anywhere could. amazing... adn you guys found it first.

how do they do that shit?

every fucking time.

wow.

they beat al jazeera, iran, syria, lebanon and everyone else to the punch.

more powerful and all knowing than entire governments

you dumb fucking retards.

er.. i mean "you soooo very enlightened ones who totally "get it"

baddog · 10-21-2006, 11:42 AM

I was setting off fireworks in Mexico that left mushroom clouds. Were they nukes too?

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

You must not be too bright to not know that video is DIGITAL and does not "over expose" like film.

Dude, give up the dumb shit. America is evil and the reat of the world knows it.

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you know who wanton is? Or what he does for a living?

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Overexposure: Overexposure refers to video or film that was shot with too much light or the wrong camera settings, resulting in a whitish, washed-out, faded-looking image.

http://www.dvspot.com/features/glossary.shtml

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

http://www.dvspot.com/features/glossary.shtml

Washed out video isn't the same as blinding video caused by a nuke.

We aren't looking at a flash spot on some bitches ass.

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 12:22 PM

I just signed up for the "all White hosting"; they didn't know the difference.
I figured the bandwidth would be pure and give me supremecy in my Pr rankings.

CyberHustler · 10-21-2006, 12:25 PM

DjSap · 10-21-2006, 12:26 PM

that wasn't a nuke, not that I would know but the US is not stupid enough to use nukes when it is not required...

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

Washed out video isn't the same as blinding video caused by a nuke.

We aren't looking at a flash spot on some bitches ass.

Thanks you seem to know alot about video shot at night. Only film can be overexposed by an unexpected bright light source right? Thats what you said in your last post at least.

No radiation came from that nuke eh? Silly silly.

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Thanks you seem to know alot about video shot at night. Only film can be overexposed by an unexpected bright light source right? Thats what you said in your last post at least.

No radiation came from that nuke eh? Silly silly.

A tac nuke of this size dose not produce mass radiation; that's why they are "Tactical Nukes"!

And what kind of fucking idiot would go to the site with a geiger counter while the shit was still smoldering to messure it?

The burning of the other material would also "burn" away the radio active material on the site. Radioactive residue can be destroyed just like any other fucking thing in the world.

CyberHustler · 10-21-2006, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DjSap

that wasn't a nuke, not that I would know but the US is not stupid enough to use nukes when it is not required...

ROFLMFAO

Matt_WildCash · 10-21-2006, 01:00 PM

Those guys on that website need to learn the word "Lens Flare" LOL

interracialtoons · 10-21-2006, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt_WildCash

Those guys on that website need to learn the word "Lens Flare" LOL

You should realize that people have considered that.

You should also realize that the US has many tactical weapons that are moved into position even if there is almost no possiblity at all that they would be used.

I can see you now if our troops were being over-run by Sadam's army and facing a complete slaughter and instead of using a small nuke to push them back we allowed the complete ground forces to be killed in a route.
You'd be screaming like why didn't we use a nuke? And the answer would be "Well, we didn't think we needed one so we left them all in a locker in Arizona". Of course, then you would call all of our military commanders a bunch of idiots for not have one close by just in case.

Lazonby · 10-21-2006, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

if that aint a nuke then there is no such thing as a nuke.

fuck the mushroom cloud! Nothing produces that kind of flash except a nuke!

Period.

You can blow up all the TNT you can find without getting that kind of flash.

That was a "light bulb flash"; regular munitions would have created a flamed flash that would have lasted much longer. Flames dissipate much slower than nuclear fusion.

I stand on my training as an NBC officer in the US military at The US Army Chemical School at Fort McClellan in Aniston Alabama!
NBC stands for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical.

It was a tactical nuke!

End of fucking story.

Oh damn. GFY's resident nuclear expert has crashed the thread to prove us all wrong. Coises!

woj · 10-21-2006, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby

Oh damn. GFY's resident nuclear expert has crashed the thread to prove us all wrong. Coises!

no kidding

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

A tac nuke of this size dose not produce mass radiation; that's why they are "Tactical Nukes"!

And what kind of fucking idiot would go to the site with a geiger counter while the shit was still smoldering to messure it?

The burning of the other material would also "burn" away the radio active material on the site. Radioactive residue can be destroyed just like any other fucking thing in the world.

stickyfingerz · 10-21-2006, 01:48 PM

So what about the fragments that were blown miles away? Would they "burn" up too? omg. So why did we have a big environmental media blitz in the 80's about left over radioactive materials if we can just "burn them up"? Do you realize how many years radioactive material lasts? Why didnt they just firebomb the area around chernobal?

Pleasurepays · 10-21-2006, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons

The burning of the other material would also "burn" away the radio active material on the site. Radioactive residue can be destroyed just like any other fucking thing in the world.

wow.

that has to be the dumbest thing i have see on this forum in a while.

dude.... seriously..

10-21-2006, 01:04 AM	#1
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	Video evidence of US tactical nukes in Iraq I was skeptical at first, but it's there. 3:56 Massive white flash and then mushroom cloud. http://www.halturnershow.com/Tactica...tedInIraq.html Also of interest is that when the Iraq war first broke out, they hit one of Saddam's bunkers and claimed to have destroyed it. The maker of that bunker stated that the only way to penetrate it was by using a tactical nuke. Are we seeing such a weapon in the video?

10-21-2006, 01:25 AM	#2
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Ummm you do realize that they were targeting an ammo dump right? Just because an explosion is suddenly larger and produces a mushroom cloud, it does not mean a nuke. Specially if they are bombing AMMO for gawds sake. Plus this is Baghdad right? Umm where are the people that would be getting radiation sickness and burns? Remember the press was there from the onset. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

10-21-2006, 01:25 AM	#3
JOHNNY_BUTTHOLES Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 146	damn. but it reads as if the nuke when off when the ammo dump caught fire. they didn't drop a bomb. __________________

10-21-2006, 01:36 AM	#6
sacX Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2,998	what the fuck is that website about it has an ad "for whites" only webhosting. "In order to have your web site hosted by us, you need to be a straight, white, non-jew. If you meet these basic criteria, you _may_ qualify for membership in our club and for our service. " __________________ Have Asian Language Traffic?

10-21-2006, 01:39 AM	#7
Zorgman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 6,103	Impressive to see. Bad for the people around it. __________________ ---

10-21-2006, 03:31 AM	#12
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,835	Check out there web host http://www.privatewebhosting.org/ __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

10-21-2006, 07:19 AM	#15
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	It was an ammo dump.. umm humm what is storred there? A whole bunch of shit that blows up.. This is a video of a fire works factory (think it was in Holland).. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...losion&hl =en notice the large explosion at the end that killed the camera man and several others?.. Yea those damn dutches used nukes too.. Tip of the day.. gun powder goes boom boom. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

10-21-2006, 07:32 AM	#19
LittleMack www.pornkings.com Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Florida Baby!! Posts: 4,645	nope, that was just a flash fire from the ammo dump blowing up __________________ [email protected]

10-21-2006, 07:38 AM	#20
Lazonby Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,262	IF YOU BELIEVE THAT EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY AND THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT IS EVIL AND YOUR ENEMIES ARE REALLY YOUR FREINDS IT JUST MEANS YOU ARE OPEN MINDED

10-21-2006, 09:06 AM	#22
jimthefiend So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: icq: 121189 Posts: 18,889	A can of spray paint tossed into a campfire produces a mushroom cloud. Nukes arent the only things that make those, ya know.

10-21-2006, 09:11 AM	#23
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,984

10-21-2006, 09:18 AM	#24
BoyAlley So Fucking Gay Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 19,714	Just FYI burning and/or blowing up a nuclear weapon will not cause it to detonate. I watch the discovery science channel

10-21-2006, 09:58 AM	#26
Juilan Sultan of Swing Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: XXXodus Posts: 15,141	Well, Bush has gone on record stating he would use tactical nukes on on Iraq, Iran and N. Korea even if it was pre-emptive. So all one has to do is read cnn.com to conclude that it's a possibility reagrdless of what side of the polictial fence your on. Don't think this video is convincing evidence though. __________________ My Best Converting VOD Sponsor \| Last edited by Juilan; 10-21-2006 at 10:00 AM..

10-21-2006, 11:10 AM	#28
interracialtoons Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,910	if that aint a nuke then there is no such thing as a nuke. fuck the mushroom cloud! Nothing produces that kind of flash except a nuke! Period. You can blow up all the TNT you can find without getting that kind of flash. That was a "light bulb flash"; regular munitions would have created a flamed flash that would have lasted much longer. Flames dissipate much slower than nuclear fusion. I stand on my training as an NBC officer in the US military at The US Army Chemical School at Fort McClellan in Aniston Alabama! NBC stands for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical. It was a tactical nuke! End of fucking story. __________________ Done.

10-21-2006, 11:41 AM	#33
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	once again, the brave and courageous folks at www.somefuckingcrazyidiot.com exposed the worlds darkest secrets before anyone else.. anywhere could. amazing... adn you guys found it first. how do they do that shit? every fucking time. wow. they beat al jazeera, iran, syria, lebanon and everyone else to the punch. more powerful and all knowing than entire governments you dumb fucking retards. er.. i mean "you soooo very enlightened ones who totally "get it"

10-21-2006, 11:42 AM	#34
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I was setting off fireworks in Mexico that left mushroom clouds. Were they nukes too?

10-21-2006, 12:22 PM	#38
interracialtoons Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,910	I just signed up for the "all White hosting"; they didn't know the difference. I figured the bandwidth would be pure and give me supremecy in my Pr rankings. __________________ Done.

10-21-2006, 12:25 PM	#39
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,496

10-21-2006, 12:26 PM	#40
DjSap Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,869	that wasn't a nuke, not that I would know but the US is not stupid enough to use nukes when it is not required... __________________ Blog Themes, TGP Design, Writing Services, Grunt Work ICQ: 66871495

10-21-2006, 01:00 PM	#44
Matt_WildCash Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,699	Those guys on that website need to learn the word "Lens Flare" LOL __________________ Try the New XMovies.com and make more $$$ with your Traffic

10-21-2006, 01:48 PM	#49
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,984	So what about the fragments that were blown miles away? Would they "burn" up too? omg. So why did we have a big environmental media blitz in the 80's about left over radioactive materials if we can just "burn them up"? Do you realize how many years radioactive material lasts? Why didnt they just firebomb the area around chernobal?