|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I know nothing about what Lee may or may not have done in the past, nor whether he should or should not have been banned before or been allowed to come back... but the reality is that the baord allows people to come back ALL THE TIME. Take pimpdog as an example if you want. The entire "banning" thing on this board is a joke. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Lee's the only person I've ever asked to be banned - moreso about what he did and said about my son and his stealing an email list more than this. Like I said originally, this was just icing on the cake. I'm sure he'll be back again. |
Quote:
You've said quite a few things on this board in the past that I have wholeheartedly agreed with, but on this point you're pushing you are way out to lunch in my opinion. TD did the right thing in banning Lee. Period. The board looks a lot cleaner today with him gone. It even smells fresher in here. :D |
Quote:
Lee made a comment that implied and/or insinuated that Peaches was involved with pedo activitites. If he did not want to get banned he should have folllowed up in the exact same post his proof/evidence of such. He should not have to be asked to come back and lay the foundations of that accusation. Get it? If I say you are involved in pedo activities, I had better back it up then and there, not come back at some later point in time to substantiate it. |
I called the guys that run a those teens with braces type sites a bunch of pedos a while back and I didn't get banned
|
CDSmith:
I have yet to see anyone explain to me how saying someone is involved with pedo ventures is the same as refering to them AS a pedo, i.e. that they ARE a pedo. The language is pretty clear unless you read into it what you want to. In one case they're involved with pedo related things which doesn't mean they are one. In the other case they are one. IMO the rules should be tightened up since it leaves ambiguities and "loopholes" for some asswipes to use. As for this "You've said quite a few things on this board in the past that I have wholeheartedly agreed with, but on this point you're pushing you are way out to lunch in my opinion." he he he.. I remember saying the same thing to you awhile ago about something you were going off about. The nice thing about you is that I know we can have an decent discussion about it and not really take it personally. baddog: Yeah nice one.. What you're saying has nothing to do with what I'm talking about or the link you posted that I was supposed to go look at again. Given your previous posts to me, I suspect you re-read something I said and pulled that statement from there. CDSmith & baddog: In this post I said the same thing as the two of you.. For making a serious accusation and then not backing it up, he should be banned. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...3&postcount=46 Quote:
This thread shows what he was banned for: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...2&postcount=19 So if you want to discuss this with me, stick to the point I'm making. That he did not break the rules that he was banned for. But since you want him gone, you could never agree with me even if you ended up seeing that I'm right. |
Quote:
I think most of us stopped reading here from laughing too hard. Im certain Peaches could give a shit less about postcount. I think it was Mr Iz that was saying how post count mattered a few years ago. Whats he doing now? |
peace and love has returned to GFY :D
|
Quote:
Why is it that GFY needs to write the rules to cover every possible scenario for you to get it? Is it possible that you are that ignorant, or is it that you just have a grudge against TD for something that happened in the past? I am guessing the latter. |
okay..so selling KP doesn't mean you are sexually attracted to kids. However, the suggestion of somebody selling it and such 'ventures' is a suggestion that should not be permitted.
|
Quote:
You also seem to have a real problem with comprehension. He did not insinuate OR accuse her of being a pedo. What he said was very clear. You're not the one that's getting it. Like I said, because you don't want to. sarah_webinc appears to get it. As far as TD.. He's the one that does most of the bannings. So you can ASSume I have a grudge against him. But my issue is that I want to see people banned "fairly" around here, or at least banned for the rules they do break and not the ones they didn't. There are some people on this board that we all know should be banned but they seem to get a free pass all the time and that pisses me off. Besides.. why do you even care? If my ranting actually got some rules fixed up and better enforced, what's wrong with that? |
Quote:
Banning is a harsh act. Lee seems to be able to talk his way out of bannishment, so why bother? He has been accused of many things which I do not believe have been proven. I want to see the proof, and not Gonzo's accusation before I believe he is guilty. |
Quote:
|
wow, I never actually thought I would see the day that someone stood up for European Lee
so, by tempest's definition, since I am only involved "involved" with a group of people sitting at a table in a restaurant, if I don't eat, I am not actually a diner? or wait, here is another one since I am "involved" with my porn websites, but I never need to update them anymore because they are automated, I am not actually a webmaster |
Quote:
|
someone should tell the owner of that board to remove the "last post by" info so people stumbling by wouldn't be able to tell just how dead it is.
|
Quote:
Just par for the course, Ron. |
more useless ramblings by tempest.....sticking up for Lee....thats a riot.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Brad and Chris made a VERY bad business decision. Not in regards to me, but they allowed WEG and 12Clicks to become 800 pound gorillas and every other sponsor there have the ability to be the same. I posted truth and backed it up when asked to - several times. That didn't make Cory or Ron very happy and they pulled advertising. Brad and Chris have now let every advertiser know that they (the advertiser) can censor the board when things aren't going their way. But it's their board :) Gonzo isn't the one who told me about Lee hacking in - several others did. It was pretty obvious when my dead son received the spam from Lee and Oprano was the ONLY board he had EVER signed up. It was 100% obvious to me that Lee stole that database and someone completely outside of Oprano, whom I also trust, let me know the content wasn't even 2257 compliant. Lee also said things about Gary Alan which if false, are horrendous that he's said them, and if true, even moreso. |
haha sweet european lee got banned quick :)
|
Quote:
|
rip lee...
about fucking time! |
Quote:
I don't know anything about European Lee except for what Gonzo posted many months ago. I know from past experiences that owners of O prano, past and present, are relentless when they decide they don't like you. Many lies and hate have been spread by Gonzo, and he damn well knows it. He wanted his 15 minutes of fame so much that he left his ethics in a black hole...never to be found again. I know Gonzo is a friend of yours, Peaches, but I also speak the truth about him. Associating with hackers can be a big mistake if you don't check all the facts. Hackers do not know what the word *trust* means. |
Quote:
I've sent you at least two emails over the last year - hope you got at least one of them........ |
Quote:
seems to me that lee pushed the limit of the rule, he was tactfull in how he expressed the 'pedo' comment to stay just inside the specific rule.. in a court of law this wouldnt stand up but we arent in a democracy or courtroom. maybe TD also skirted the line with what is a justified ban and what is a questionable ban.... so what... hopefully he will push the limits some more and ban some other asshats on technicalities. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123