Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill - GoFuckYourself.com

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 07:42 PM

...

for my site www.no-lolitas.com (alternativ: www.teenchubbys.com )

THIS SITE IS IN NO WAY USED OR MENT TO ATTRACT THE UNDERAGE AUDIENCE Its just a fucking sitename.There are no lolita /underage keywords or something.

But Ccbill refuses to allow this site for processing.

I even offered them to remove all HTML traces(filenames, url etc) for the word Lolita as long as i can leave the logo pictures as they are ( so it would be impossible to find this site using SE for the term lolita in any way)

So any CCProcessor around that is a little bit felxible?

Clearance: I completly understand and support the default blacklisting of the term "lolita" but as i said in my case its a clearly visible anti lolita sitename and just! a sitename (without any searchable trace for that term or use of that term in any text)

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 07:45 PM

What a fucking joke --- why didn't you just call your site "Child-porn-not-here.com"

From the text on your site:
"Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?"

Think the search engines won't see "skinny, 12 year old looking lolita"???

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 07:46 PM

Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...

or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 07:50 PM

"Click here if you DON'T not want this" --- gets a little confusing doesn't it?

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...

or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

I call bullshit.

Steve Lightspeed

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 07:51 PM

If you don´t like fat girls .. wouldn´t it be obvious to first visit the site www.no-fats.com ?

MaDalton · 12-20-2006, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...

or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

jact · 12-20-2006, 07:51 PM

Well, uhm, err.. I'd suggest spinning it a different way.

BoyAlley · 12-20-2006, 07:52 PM

You have got to be kidding?!?!?!?!

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...

or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

You seem to have "www.teenchubbys.com" already, so why are you fighting to keep the lolita name AT ALL?

To blame CCbill for not wanting to touch this is really fucked up on YOUR PART. CCbill should be commended for it.

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 07:58 PM

yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?

don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?

don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?

Maybe you should have learned the rules before you played the paysite game?

Sly · 12-20-2006, 08:01 PM

Out of curiosity, is English your primary language?

RawAlex · 12-20-2006, 08:02 PM

When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.

MaDalton · 12-20-2006, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.

or maybe the designer should have said something

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 08:04 PM

Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done..

That´s what i am complaining about!

Where is the flexibility?

When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Out of curiosity, is English your primary language?

obviously not

MaDalton · 12-20-2006, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done..

That´s what i am complaining about!

Where is the flexibility?

When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..

gibs auf

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 08:06 PM

scheissdreck verfluchter :-P

Sly · 12-20-2006, 08:06 PM

There is absolutely no need for "flexibility" in their regard. Where is your "flexibility"?

Nobody wants unnecessary heat. You're creating unnecessary heat. Nobody in the US is going to process you, Visa would laugh.

sweetums · 12-20-2006, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?

don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?

Why would you bother to build your site around a term that every reputable processor attempts to stay 10-feet away from? It's certainly not like that's a new policy that any of them have....

And I highly doubt that the domain "no-legal-age-models.com" would be considered acceptable -- it's all about the connotations, and that one just raises red flags all around.

Sly · 12-20-2006, 08:10 PM

I'm starting a new site, www.no-scat.com

Anybody up for partnership?

MaDalton · 12-20-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

scheissdreck verfluchter :-P

ich weiß

aber keiner wird dein konzept als solches akzeptieren. das wort "lolita" allein ist das problem - weil die auchmaschinen darauf anspringen. auch wenn du es genau andersrum meinst. und da alle seiten von visa gecheckt werden, kann auch ccbill nix machen - selbst wenn die wollten.

die andere domain ist doch prima - musst nur den header umbauen

PS: ich hätte noch passenden content für dich - ;)))

SomeCreep · 12-20-2006, 08:13 PM

"No-lolitas", worst name ever. Change the name.

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 08:13 PM

enough now. close that i erase that fucking term

i really hope i will never have to read a comment again on Domain registrars or hosting companys that shut down sites because the models look underage because that is the same thing (playing with the fire ) like here ... hm no its even worse because that are real girls here its just a word but everybody greatly understands the anger of the owners of these "kiddy looking" sites.

some mod plz close here . everything is said

naja suchmaschiene würde nur die domain finden auf den seiten is ja nix was textliches was den namen erhält. naja was soll man machen. . wegen content meld ich mich mal ;)

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 08:13 PM

Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"

Vigilante · 12-20-2006, 08:17 PM

no brain... und jetzt klappe zu :-P

gleem · 12-20-2006, 08:34 PM

how about:

no-I-never-get-processed.com

lol

WebDork · 12-20-2006, 08:51 PM

Just drop $8 for a new domain and move on ... Processors are anal about this kind of thing. www.cardsgate.com Im sure would process it ...

natkejs · 12-20-2006, 08:59 PM

this is a joke right?

vvq · 12-20-2006, 09:11 PM

teenchubbys sounds much better. don't like ccbill policies, try another processor. but i don't think any are gonna touch a site with 'lolitas' in the domain. bad idea on your part.

Yngwie · 12-20-2006, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natkejs

this is a joke right?

I'm fucking hoping it is otherwise something is very wrong.

The fact that you have "no" before lolita means shit. You still have that in your domain and site title and other text on the site so that means that you will attract the sickos. Get it now? Didn't think so.

Let me ask you this. Why in the fuck did you think that this was a good name? Did you think that it would be like you taking a stand? Like you saying "I don't deal with or approve of underage girls so I will use lolita in my domain name and put no in front of it". Where's the sense in that? I can guarantee that IF you were to get processing for this site and it was live you would have people watching you and also keeping an eye on the processor. They don't care that you may not have "no lolitas" on the site. It's all in the name and the way you are promoting it.

for example

"Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?And then you searched for something "more"... some curves,some big ass,something chubby...you get these disgusting fat, ugly bitches? We decided to stop this mess and bring you the girls you want when you look for chubby girls!"

What the fuck were you thinking????

Webby · 12-20-2006, 09:19 PM

DUH???

I just grabbed a load of "no kiddie porn" sites - gotta be a winner

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 09:20 PM

"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

MaDalton · 12-20-2006, 09:22 PM

give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now

Webby · 12-20-2006, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

BOSS1 · 12-20-2006, 09:26 PM

i know one person who thinks like that

Yngwie · 12-20-2006, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now

if that was true he would have removed the text mentioned in this thread from the site.

Yngwie · 12-20-2006, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

now that takes the fucking cake.

SteveLightspeed · 12-20-2006, 09:32 PM

This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???

cess · 12-20-2006, 09:35 PM

lol...... thanks i needed a good laugh.

Yngwie · 12-20-2006, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???

that's a very good question. I know that if I was a sponsor I would not accept traffic from there. May be good traffic, but it's not worth the heat it can bring.

Barefootsies · 12-21-2006, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

I call bullshit.

Steve Lightspeed

If I find out you did this...

....I'm going to get you.

<puts on shades>

Barefootsies · 12-21-2006, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

Correct.

Anyone with any sense knows not to use banned words on their site. Much less in a domain name.

Barefootsies · 12-21-2006, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"

bizarredollars · 12-21-2006, 06:57 AM

I'm not going to get into a fucking argument here.. just change the damn site name, and ccbill will process it.. Nothing wrong with using teenchubby's.

bizarredollars · 12-21-2006, 07:00 AM

We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.

www.verotel.com
www.365billing.com
www.segpay.com
www.standardpay.com

Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.

bizarredollars · 12-21-2006, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???

I would not take traffic from that domain.

KGucci · 12-21-2006, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizarredollars

We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.

www.segpay.com

Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.

You are correct! There is no processor that will accept such a site. If you do find one, please post it in this thread so webmasters can stay clear of them.

If anyone has any questions regarding SegPay.com, please feel free to contact me directly.

corvette · 12-21-2006, 09:00 AM

Missed this thread until now, cant see the site because it appears to no longer be a site, teenchubbys.com is down as well ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

i hope steve was joking about this?

We are not flexible in the least with issues that affect our relationship with our banks, looks like the other posters in this thread explained that to you

12-20-2006, 07:42 PM	#1
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill ... for my site www.no-lolitas.com (alternativ: www.teenchubbys.com ) THIS SITE IS IN NO WAY USED OR MENT TO ATTRACT THE UNDERAGE AUDIENCE Its just a fucking sitename.There are no lolita /underage keywords or something. But Ccbill refuses to allow this site for processing. I even offered them to remove all HTML traces(filenames, url etc) for the word Lolita as long as i can leave the logo pictures as they are ( so it would be impossible to find this site using SE for the term lolita in any way) So any CCProcessor around that is a little bit felxible? Clearance: I completly understand and support the default blacklisting of the term "lolita" but as i said in my case its a clearly visible anti lolita sitename and just! a sitename (without any searchable trace for that term or use of that term in any text)

12-20-2006, 07:45 PM	#2
SteveLightspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lightspeedworld Posts: 7,940	What a fucking joke --- why didn't you just call your site "Child-porn-not-here.com" From the text on your site: "Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?" Think the search engines won't see "skinny, 12 year old looking lolita"??? __________________ Abra-cadabra! Last edited by SteveLightspeed; 12-20-2006 at 07:47 PM..

12-20-2006, 07:46 PM	#3
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site. I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ... or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites? Last edited by Vigilante; 12-20-2006 at 07:48 PM..

12-20-2006, 07:50 PM	#4
SteveLightspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lightspeedworld Posts: 7,940	"Click here if you DON'T not want this" --- gets a little confusing doesn't it? __________________ Abra-cadabra!

12-20-2006, 07:51 PM	#8
jact Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Canada Posts: 9,134	Well, uhm, err.. I'd suggest spinning it a different way. __________________ Free agent

12-20-2006, 07:52 PM	#9
BoyAlley So Fucking Gay Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 19,714	You have got to be kidding?!?!?!?!

12-20-2006, 07:58 PM	#11
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons..... With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ? don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)? Last edited by Vigilante; 12-20-2006 at 08:00 PM..

12-20-2006, 08:01 PM	#13
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,329	Out of curiosity, is English your primary language? __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc. Click here for more details.

12-20-2006, 08:02 PM	#14
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.

12-20-2006, 08:04 PM	#16
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done.. That´s what i am complaining about! Where is the flexibility? When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..

12-20-2006, 08:06 PM	#19
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	scheissdreck verfluchter :-P

12-20-2006, 08:10 PM	#22
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,329	I'm starting a new site, www.no-scat.com Anybody up for partnership? __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc. Click here for more details.

12-20-2006, 08:13 PM	#24
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	"No-lolitas", worst name ever. Change the name. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

12-20-2006, 08:17 PM	#27
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	no brain... und jetzt klappe zu :-P

12-20-2006, 08:34 PM	#28
gleem Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Sunny Land Posts: 5,593	how about: no-I-never-get-processed.com lol __________________ Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

12-20-2006, 08:51 PM	#29
WebDork Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 402	Just drop $8 for a new domain and move on ... Processors are anal about this kind of thing. www.cardsgate.com Im sure would process it ... __________________ Video Ipod Porn Site with Affiliate Program. http://www.podies.com Free 1:1 Adult Webmaster Banner Exchange.

12-20-2006, 08:59 PM	#30
natkejs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Nomad Land Posts: 1,629	this is a joke right? __________________

12-20-2006, 09:11 PM	#31
vvq Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: TrafficGigolos.com Posts: 2,732	teenchubbys sounds much better. don't like ccbill policies, try another processor. but i don't think any are gonna touch a site with 'lolitas' in the domain. bad idea on your part. __________________ SQUIRTING - LESBIAN SPANKING - TITTY FUCKING - WET PANTIES - MORE We offer free hosting, your own designer (works for free), and unsaturated content for gallery and free site submitters. Just contact me! E-mail: [email protected]

12-20-2006, 09:19 PM	#33
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	DUH??? I just grabbed a load of "no kiddie porn" sites - gotta be a winner __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

12-20-2006, 09:20 PM	#34
SteveLightspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lightspeedworld Posts: 7,940	"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...." __________________ Abra-cadabra!

12-20-2006, 09:22 PM	#35
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,829	give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

12-20-2006, 09:26 PM	#37
BOSS1 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Montreal / Sparta Posts: 4,331	i know one person who thinks like that

12-20-2006, 09:32 PM	#40
SteveLightspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lightspeedworld Posts: 7,940	This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ??? __________________ Abra-cadabra!

12-20-2006, 09:35 PM	#41
cess Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,921	lol...... thanks i needed a good laugh. __________________

12-21-2006, 06:57 AM	#46
bizarredollars Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: bizarredollars.com Posts: 1,582	I'm not going to get into a fucking argument here.. just change the damn site name, and ccbill will process it.. Nothing wrong with using teenchubby's. __________________ [email protected] icq: 205-252-550

12-21-2006, 07:00 AM	#47
bizarredollars Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: bizarredollars.com Posts: 1,582	We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however. www.verotel.com www.365billing.com www.segpay.com www.standardpay.com Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word. __________________ [email protected] icq: 205-252-550