so if a mod makes himself look retarded...
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
When I see a request that is retarded, yes.ICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] comComment
-
well i haven't seen any exploits for that bbcode , but i have read about some bogus youtube clips that infect the viewer with zango
http://www.spywareremovalnews.com/ne...icle-1102.htmlComment
-
The only downside to embedding youtube and other vids is when people quote and keep the vid in the quote, and autoplay is turned on, it really fucks up your browsing experience ...
or, if multiple people post in the same thread, etc. Imagine 20 vids playing, starting at 1 second intervals
Comment
-
No video in my board autoplays, what option is that?The only downside to embedding youtube and other vids is when people quote and keep the vid in the quote, and autoplay is turned on, it really fucks up your browsing experience ...
or, if multiple people post in the same thread, etc. Imagine 20 vids playing, starting at 1 second intervals
Go Fuck Yourself!
ICQ 101411627Comment
-
Comment
-
That's actually easier than most might think.well i haven't seen any exploits for that bbcode , but i have read about some bogus youtube clips that infect the viewer with zango
http://www.spywareremovalnews.com/ne...icle-1102.htmlICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] comComment
-
He is talking about FAKE you tube clips and that bbcode wouldnt work with that shit, you really dont have a clue do you? That's not a problem, noone knows everything, but you should really try to learn a little bit instead of acting like a fool. This is a webmaster board you know? Some people here know a few things about the interweb. Learn from them.
Go Fuck Yourself!
ICQ 101411627Comment
-
Comment
-
most youtube videos don't autoplay when they are embedded off the youtube siteThe only downside to embedding youtube and other vids is when people quote and keep the vid in the quote, and autoplay is turned on, it really fucks up your browsing experience ...
or, if multiple people post in the same thread, etc. Imagine 20 vids playing, starting at 1 second intervals
same with pornotube...hehe..but you knew that
Comment
-
I wish he would explain it more detail, I am genuinely curious as to what would happen in regards to security, I have seen tons of forums that did it, and not one has been hacked or ran into issuesComment
-
from vbulletins site:
Are there any security issues with this??even the vbulletin experts say there is no security riskThe embeded flash is running off youtube's server and there's no html to embed the code. It's all bb code and you're only posting the end numerical value of the video's url.Comment
-
Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
.
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
Is that possible? How could malicious code survive the flash encryption by Youtube?Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
2hptada!Comment
-
Ok now you got me interested, but I would like you to get into more detail about it. They can put a script on a video and host it on youtube? And what kind of stuff can that script do to a site that is just displaying the youtube player? I really would like to know.Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
Go Fuck Yourself!
ICQ 101411627Comment
-
I dont think youtube allows videos with action script embedded does it? I know Ive tried it with a simliar site of a pornographic natureActually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
and the video was automatically rejected.
Comment
-
-
well, isn't IE7 going to be a mandatory download here soon? nothing active or action gets by IE7 for me so far....any time anything tries to run it stops it and prompts meActually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
happened with Zango too, Zango tried to install on my computer and IE7 said NOPE!Comment
-
If what you're suggesting is possible, then YouTube would have been raped to hell and back a long time ago.Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
Of course script kiddies have taken notice. Hell, I'm not even a script kiddie and it was one of the first thoughts that crossed my mind when I first came across YouTube.
Comment
-
-
Actually, you don't even have to past the whole URL, just the identifier code from the end -- like this
2hp
tada!Comment
-
yeah.. that's what the bb code mod would do
we built a media tag that plays vids, audio and flash movies from specific sites.. pretty easy for the users, and secure for us.PHP Code:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAP_pxMqmr4[/youtube]Comment
-
actually, the youtube one is even cooler
it just does this
no url even necessary
you can do the same with pornotube, no installs or code rewrites necessaryComment
-
Texas said FUCKIT!!!
BigCocks.com -
MatureWomen.com -
Tranny.com -
DrunkGirls.com -
TeenGirls.com -
MonsterCock.com and
many more... Click
here to see them all!Comment
-
you don't know much about how YouTube works do you?Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
you upload a mpg, avi, or mov file, not a flash file, you cannot put actionscript for flash, in an mpg/avi/mov their servers convert it to a FLV file, not even flash, flv can't have actionscript either, so no, theres is no possible way for someone to cause harm or anything to ones computer by uploading a movie to youtube...
...plus you think Youtube/Google is stupid enough to let shit like that slide? they got programs that catch that shit, i doubt a big company like google, or hell even the guys who started youtube, being ex paypal programmers would even just "overlook" a security flaw like that...Comment
-
It's easy to modify it that way.. we allow several media sources with the same tag, so we just tell the user to paste the url supplied by the host.Comment
-
-
FYI, there's 2 options that render those attacks completely useless, try looking up on the "allowScriptAccess" and "allowNetworking" tags.Actually, the vulnerability that it opens has nothing to do with HTML or BBCode. It has to do with the possibility of malicious ActionScript embedded in the "videos". Luckily, it's not too much of a danger ATM, as most scriptkiddies haven't really taken notice of it yet. Then again, nothing is ever a problem until all hell breaks loose.
Comment
-
Comment
-
TD is smarter than Paypal/YouTube/Google. That's why he works for Adult.com...you don't know much about how YouTube works do you?
you upload a mpg, avi, or mov file, not a flash file, you cannot put actionscript for flash, in an mpg/avi/mov their servers convert it to a FLV file, not even flash, flv can't have actionscript either, so no, theres is no possible way for someone to cause harm or anything to ones computer by uploading a movie to youtube...
...plus you think Youtube/Google is stupid enough to let shit like that slide? they got programs that catch that shit, i doubt a big company like google, or hell even the guys who started youtube, being ex paypal programmers would even just "overlook" a security flaw like that...
ADG WebmasterComment
-
Well, the problem is not the code surviving the FLV encryption, the danger is of the malicious code hijacking the encoding subroutine before it even begins.
The problem is not so much a matter of what exploits are known at this very moment, rather what exploitable weaknesses exist that no one has discovered yet. The transition from all content (swf vids) being stored and accessed through a FMS to this new generation of dynamic-loading external FLVs has come about a much greater rate than was initially anticipated (and the increased demand is pushing up development deadlines and cutting test time prior to release).
True, but unfortunately that is only for now. Once the blackhats have time enough to play with IE7 and find it's potential weaknesses, it will be open season on IE again.
That's just it (it's kind of complicated... or at least, difficult to explain), we do know that it is possible, we just don't know how. Fortunately neither do they. Basically, it's a race to see who can figure it out first. At the moment (and for the foreseeable future), everything is fine and secure. What the future holds, however, is anybody's guess.If what you're suggesting is possible, then YouTube would have been raped to hell and back a long time ago.
Of course script kiddies have taken notice. Hell, I'm not even a script kiddie and it was one of the first thoughts that crossed my mind when I first came across YouTube.
.
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
This is true. But what happens if someone discovers a way to circumvent or override those method tags? Keep in mind, those very methods were just recently adapted due to a weakness discovered in previous platforms..
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
Good advice - be afraid of the unknown...
ADG WebmasterComment
-
TripleXPrint on Megan Fox
"I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"Comment




Comment