Real Amateursites are impossible !?! - GoFuckYourself.com

Vigilante · 11-09-2006, 02:57 AM

I am currently thinking about that whole amateur thing...

On the one hand there are some sites like (german) Xww.privatamateure.com that offer real (double verified) amateur content from individual members.

On the other hand there is that 2257 shit that forces webmasters to prove idenitity , age (and agreement to publish? ) of every individual showed on the sites.

So what´s the deal? Is it possible to accept member submited photos on his websites or are fake "amateur" contents the only solution because of 2257?

And what about copyright? Even if a member submits some pictures of "himself" along with some agreement and ID : how can one be sure that is in fact him fucking at the photos?

What do you think about that matter?

Vigilante · 11-09-2006, 09:11 AM

*back to page1*

Come on . Noone knows anything about it?

L-Pink · 11-09-2006, 09:18 AM

Squishypimp is our forum expert. I suggest contacting him directly. Mentioning you are gay will generate a quicker response. You're welcome.

RawAlex · 11-09-2006, 09:48 AM

Vigilante, you would require 2257 documentation (along with IDs) from every performer and everyone appearing in the pictures, that much is clear. The question of validity comes up with much of the stuff, however, because you have no way to assure that the "performer" really is the one signing the papers, unless you ask for a video clip of the signing of the documents or something.

This is a very touchy legal question, don't play games with chatboard lawyers, get a real lawyer and find out.

dustin101 · 11-09-2006, 06:15 PM

Yes, practically your right

Tuga · 11-09-2006, 06:18 PM

Look at Voyeur Web...

Vigilante · 11-10-2006, 04:32 AM

Yes i know there are sites using real amateur content:

But how come they don´t have massive problems with the authorities regarding their lack of 2257 documents?

Big John · 11-10-2006, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante

Yes i know there are sites using real amateur content:

But how come they don´t have massive problems with the authorities regarding their lack of 2257 documents?

Oddly enough there's an awful lot of the world not based in the USA

Last I looked Scotland had no 2257 law, or any of the UK or even Europe for that matter. Of course there are other legal hurdles to be careful of but for many people 2257 isn't one of them.

lyn1 · 11-10-2006, 05:08 AM

The right wing religious fanatics are fucking the business for pornmasters in the US.

Move offshore.

Lyn from Oz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big John

Oddly enough there's an awful lot of the world not based in the USA

Last I looked Scotland had no 2257 law, or any of the UK or even Europe for that matter. Of course there are other legal hurdles to be careful of but for many people 2257 isn't one of them.

Nicky · 11-10-2006, 05:51 AM

Whats this 2257 you talk off? :-P

gooddomains · 11-10-2006, 05:54 AM

2257 ??? Never heard of it. I copy my content from the Interweb.

Ace_luffy · 11-10-2006, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Squishypimp is our forum expert. I suggest contacting him directly. Mentioning you are gay will generate a quicker response. You're welcome.

JP-pornshooter · 11-10-2006, 01:19 PM

look at hahahahahaha.com
here is a seemingly US site with tons of member uploaded adult hardcore content..but is possible they are offshore ?

JP-pornshooter · 11-10-2006, 01:20 PM

duh..me no so smart..
so its hahahahahaha

Klen · 11-10-2006, 01:40 PM

Real amateurs are possible at sites which are not located in USA

11-09-2006, 02:57 AM	#1
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	Real Amateursites are impossible !?! I am currently thinking about that whole amateur thing... On the one hand there are some sites like (german) Xww.privatamateure.com that offer real (double verified) amateur content from individual members. On the other hand there is that 2257 shit that forces webmasters to prove idenitity , age (and agreement to publish? ) of every individual showed on the sites. So what´s the deal? Is it possible to accept member submited photos on his websites or are fake "amateur" contents the only solution because of 2257? And what about copyright? Even if a member submits some pictures of "himself" along with some agreement and ID : how can one be sure that is in fact him fucking at the photos? What do you think about that matter?

11-09-2006, 06:15 PM	#5
dustin101 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 186	Yes, practically your right __________________ Get Search Engine Ranking and Good Traffic! Free Link Exchange Directory, Click Here!

11-09-2006, 06:18 PM	#6
Tuga Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Portugal Posts: 7,678	Look at Voyeur Web... __________________ Go Fuck Yourself! ICQ 101411627

11-10-2006, 05:51 AM	#10
Nicky Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,069	Whats this 2257 you talk off? :-P __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

11-09-2006, 09:11 AM	#2
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	back to page1 Come on . Noone knows anything about it?

11-09-2006, 09:18 AM	#3
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Squishypimp is our forum expert. I suggest contacting him directly. Mentioning you are gay will generate a quicker response. You're welcome.

11-09-2006, 09:48 AM	#4
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	Vigilante, you would require 2257 documentation (along with IDs) from every performer and everyone appearing in the pictures, that much is clear. The question of validity comes up with much of the stuff, however, because you have no way to assure that the "performer" really is the one signing the papers, unless you ask for a video clip of the signing of the documents or something. This is a very touchy legal question, don't play games with chatboard lawyers, get a real lawyer and find out.

11-10-2006, 04:32 AM	#7
Vigilante Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tätervolk City Posts: 696	Yes i know there are sites using real amateur content: But how come they don´t have massive problems with the authorities regarding their lack of 2257 documents?

11-10-2006, 05:54 AM	#11
gooddomains Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands Posts: 10,127	2257 ??? Never heard of it. I copy my content from the Interweb.

11-10-2006, 01:19 PM	#13
JP-pornshooter Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: westcoast usa Posts: 4,007	look at hahahahahaha.com here is a seemingly US site with tons of member uploaded adult hardcore content..but is possible they are offshore ?

11-10-2006, 01:20 PM	#14
JP-pornshooter Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: westcoast usa Posts: 4,007	duh..me no so smart.. so its hahahahahaha

11-10-2006, 01:40 PM	#15
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	Real amateurs are possible at sites which are not located in USA