GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Xmatch - Stolen Content - Traffic - Zango (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=675308)

marketsmart 11-09-2006 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 11279762)
The profiles you have pointed out have been sent to our abuse team for review. If you'd like to contact them directly you can click on the abuse link at the bottom of every profile or you can e-mail [email protected].

We take content theft seriously and will terminate any account in violation when notified.

as long as they are not a major affiliate... LOL.... fuck off sagi.....

Jace 11-09-2006 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 11279762)
The profiles you have pointed out have been sent to our abuse team for review. If you'd like to contact them directly you can click on the abuse link at the bottom of every profile or you can e-mail [email protected].

We take content theft seriously and will terminate any account in violation when notified.

um...hey, dumbass

that wasn't the main point of the thread

nice avoidance though

QuaWee 11-09-2006 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 11282506)
as long as they are not a major affiliate... LOL.... fuck off sagi.....

:1orglaugh :thumbsup

JD 11-09-2006 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 11282488)
No comment on the xmatch zango ad targeting xmatch traffic ?

lol did you actually think there would be?

Bake 11-09-2006 06:44 PM

Zango is the devil

will76 11-09-2006 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11281034)
When did I say it's ok to make a dating profile with someone else's pic or to use someone else's content without permission in any other situation???

I never said that you said it was ok to make profile with other people's content. Comment to the other posters who said that. Apparently you were trying to tell me that only ignorant people doesn't know that AFF has fake profiles on it. SO they don't steal the content, they just have a site full of fake shit, that is what you were saying right ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11281034)
What I was getting at is that the practice is common knowledge even among those who don't promote dating sites and not exactly thread worthy unless you are running out of ideas for Zango threads.

Not even looking at the stolen content, It is not thread worthy to point out where xmatch is stealing traffic from xmatch affiliates ? Lars and Sagi said they don't do this. Here you see clear as day, xmatch is targeting xmatch traffic. You are right, on GFY, this is not thread worthy, i guess the other 95% of the post about someone's post count and who you hit it, guess what i did last night... are post worthy? This is not post worthy in your opinion because you are a shill for AFF.


Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11281034)
Will, the reason I was saying you weren't too bright on geo stuff is because you posted a geo url for people to look at a profile that was among results for New Orleans. Not everyone lives in New Orleans and therefore wouldn't see the pic you were talking about..

LOL apparently I know more about geotargeting then you. In 95% of the time that geotargeting is used it is the same pictures for everyone but just the city that changes. man you are a dumb ass. Was i suspose to believe that by chance, the person who stole this picture just so happened to use a town that was 90 miles away from me ? I think it is more likely that AFF was using the same landing page for everyone, and just changing the city to make it look like the girls where from their city. After all the profiles are fake right, so not like the person is ever going to find out her location was not true.


Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11281034)
Talking about Zango specifically, as I have said repeatedly, I don't think going after one sponsor is the best way to solve the Zango problem but you are free to do that and I'm free to disagree correct?
If you had made more SexSearch threads than AFF threads, I would more than likely be saying the same things and you would be caling me a SexSearch shill and I have sent them maybe a thousand uniques total ever so makes no difference.
..

Bullshit, you already said the reason you are supporting them was because they were good to you. So which is it, do you just want to support the sponsor that I put too much heat on or do you want to support the sponsor I put heat on that has been good to you. Get your stories straight. LOL you would be supporting sexsearch too if I gave them more threads then AFF, what are you the chairman of the equal enforcement of heat against sponsors who get bashed for using Zango. You jump people's shit because they bash one sponsor more then the next one :1orglaugh LOL and you call me ignorant, I would be proving you right if I actually bought your shit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11281034)
Here's some ideas for more National Enquirer style thread titles for ya as you are obviously running out of ideas to keep Zango as flavor of the month. :thumbsup

AFF AND ZANGO CAUSES AIDS
AFF AND ZANGO CAUSES CANCER
AFF AND ZANGO MADE THE U.S. INVADE IRAQ
AFF AND ZANGO INVENTED BIRD FLU
AFF AND ZANGO DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR K-FED BRITNEY DIVORCE

Wait ..scratch that first one. AFF probably does contribute to the AIDS epidemic by encouraging people to meet up for sex. :)

This is what we call spin boys and girls. You try to difuse the situation by exagerating and mocking the poster. You can call me ignorant and you can say my thread is not post worthy, but you can't deny my post is 100% correct. So you can try through out stupid shit like zango causes aids as a comparison of what I am posting. If you want to be such a smart, no biased guy then instead of insulting me, debate the facts of what I posted.

xmatch is targeting xmatch traffic by using zango, which steals signups from their affiliates.
xmatch has stolen ifriends content on their site.

Is that not correct ? nice try. tell your buddy lars he needs to send smarter trolls next time.

will76 11-09-2006 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 11281320)
Which means the "common practice" argument isn't valid or useful in the first place, so using it in a debate just adds filler and infers that you're using it to justify the practice.

So just stop using it.

exaclty, OZ knows that what AFF is doing is wrong.

He can't debate me on the facts, which are in the title of this thread...
- xmatch was targeting xmatch traffic by using zango, making it impossible for there not to be "adware collusions" AKA stealing.
- xmatch has stolen content on their site.

Since he knows this is true and he has no argument his whole defense is to belittle and mock me and try to down play the whole situation " oh this whole thread is not post worthy " LOL On GFY this is not post worthy LOL. " you are ignorant, you don't know how geotargeting works and that there are fake profiles on these site" So what does that have to do about the fact there was stolen content on there regardless and that xmatch was targeting xmatch. " i would defend any sponsor you post about more then the others" LOL suuuurrre you would. " Why don't you post zango causes aids".... You too much OZ.

OZman, the chairman of the equal enforcement of heat against sponsors who get bashed for using Zango too much by Will76. Nice job title you gave yourself there. I look forward to you defending sex search when I give them 3 more post then AFF tomorrow :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

OzMan 11-09-2006 09:33 PM

Will, If you didn't mention the stolen content part this would be yet another AFF uses Zango thread. You added the "stolen" part like it was something unusual for dating sites and implying that AFF stole the pic and made the profile themselves rather than someone simply uploading it.

Isn't the fact that AFF uses Zango old news now? Why don't you bump some of your old threads?

Hence my sarcasm on your future thread titles...
"AFF uses Zango but you already knew that so they umm probably do this and that as well"

Is removing stolen content from the Net going to be your new crusade when you have gotten rid of adware? I wish you luck. You are going to need to make a lot more threads in that case.

Oh on the geo targetting, it was my understanding that most dating sites that use model pics do indeed rotate the location but on user submitted pics like this one they would keep the city the same as it was entered, I could well be wrong on that though but I refreshed that page several times and didn't see the pic in question.

I look forward to your SexSearch threads tomorrow. :thumbsup

will76 11-10-2006 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11283602)
Will, If you didn't mention the stolen content part this would be yet another AFF uses Zango thread. You added the "stolen" part like it was something unusual for dating sites and implying that AFF stole the pic and made the profile themselves rather than someone simply uploading it.

Isn't the fact that AFF uses Zango old news now? Why don't you bump some of your old threads?

Wrong again. This is not just another " AFF using Zango thread". Sagi and Lars repeatedly said they do not target the same site with zango ads. You know the AFF traffic pops up a Cams.com page and vice versa, so it makes it ok bullshit they told us. So this was an instance showing one of their sites targeting the same site, something they specifically said they were not doing. So this is a lot different then just another zango thread but I didn't expect you to see that.


Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11283602)
Is removing stolen content from the Net going to be your new crusade when you have gotten rid of adware? I wish you luck. You are going to need to make a lot more threads in that case.

Is stupidity going to be your new crusade that and attacking all of my Zango + AFF threads. How can you be so stupid to make a comment like that. I make one post about stolen content, ONE POST EVER ON GFY about content that was made exclusivly for me and was stolen, and you ask the question if my next crusade is going to be removing stolen content??? Man you are reaching, and you just making yourself look more and more like a fool everytime you say assine things like that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 11283602)
Oh on the geo targetting, it was my understanding that most dating sites that use model pics do indeed rotate the location but on user submitted pics like this one they would keep the city the same as it was entered, I could well be wrong on that though but I refreshed that page several times and didn't see the pic in question.

I am sure some dating sites do it that way and I am sure some don't, out side of dating site i think no one uses geotargeting that way. I found it more then coincidental that the content that was stolen from me was entered into their site using a city that was close to me, what are the chances of that happening. It is also a landing page. For all I know that was bought content AFF owned (other then my stolen image) and that was a standard advertising page they used for their "landing page". It wasn't like I did a search on their site and got that image. So with all that taking into consideration, I don't think I was being ignorant about how geotargeting works. Little comments like that from you destroy any point that you are attempting to make, it just makes it blatantly obvious why you are posting and what you are trying to accomplish with your posts.

Which you still can not deny that what I am saying is not true, xmatch was targeting xmatch traffic, i found stolen content on their site. You can however continue to downplay this as no big deal but I think only you and AFF supporters see it that way.

will76 11-13-2006 12:23 PM

bump for a good thread :)

pornpf69 11-13-2006 12:58 PM

lots of info around here!!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123