The procedure was legally practiced by doctors in the United States until 1996, and is still common in many developing countries, some at rates exceeding 95%.
Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!
The guy Tommy who shoots for us has an AntEater(foreskin) and I think we are missing out on alot of pleasure by getting it chopped. He gets all crazy legged when cumming. .....Okay back to topic I agree with Scooter Chop his Cock off
Thats just a nice name for Butchery. I can see it being used in Africa for control. Alot of the time to gain power over the men they give them power over the women...
Good for him, serves him right for following some archaic right of passage. How you can do that to your child is beyond me. Male or female it's fuckin stupid. To me there is no difference between this ceremonial mutilation, or the male ceremonial mutilation practiced so widely by so called civilized people and their religions.
Good for him, serves him right for following some archaic right of passage. How you can do that to your child is beyond me. Male or female it's fuckin stupid. To me there is no difference between this ceremonial mutilation, or the male ceremonial mutilation practiced so widely by so called civilized people and their religions.
The difference is atleast on the Male part there is some hygenic reasoning(which is still argued) On the female part it is purely to strip the women of the pleasure of sex and control them
The difference is at least on the Male part there is some hygienic reasoning(which is still argued) On the female part it is purely to strip the women of the pleasure of sex and control them
There is the same hygiene argument for the female labia which is part of female circumcision, as well as foreskin. And if actually maintained properly the foreskin actually has antibacterial properties. The only real argument for cosmetic male mutilation is a religious and societal, "icky factor".
The cutting of of the clitoris is definitely over the top, sick and sadistic. Either way this is a good time for a little eye for an eye justice IMO.
While I understand being opposed to male circumcision, It's totally not appropriate to equate most types of female genital mutilation with male circ. FGM is done in a variety of different ways, and there's a big difference between snipping a little off the hood (akin to male circ) and cutting off the whole clit and/or labia and/or sewing what's left of her labia shut save for a tiny hole.
What this guy did (or his wife's family did , which actually sounds pretty likely since it's usually considered woman's work to mutilate the girls) would be as extreme as cutting off a guy's dick except that there's no urethra in a girl's clit, so comparing cutting the foreskin to cutting off an entire organ is really offensively inaccurate.
Girls DIE from FGM and it's not commonly performed in a sterile environment by medical professionals; you cannot say the same things of male circ.
Go ahead and protest male circumcision all you want, but don't act like it's the same thing as the chopping and hacking off of women's genitals. It's not. And no, there is absolutely no hygenic reason to do this to women; using that as an excuse is completely backwater stoopid. The people who use that argument are the ones who put baby powder and corn meal and towels in and up women's cunts before they fuck them because they think dry pussy is more pleasurable.
WebWhoreBucks: Girls, a guy and a tranny -- unique indie porn!
While I understand being opposed to male circumcision, It's totally not appropriate to equate most types of female genital mutilation with male circ. FGM is done in a variety of different ways, and there's a big difference between snipping a little off the hood (akin to male circ) and cutting off the whole clit and/or labia and/or sewing what's left of her labia shut save for a tiny hole.
You are certainly 100% correct in saying that the female version is FAR more barbaric and torturous. Though IMO equally archaic.
Originally posted by Trixie
What this guy did (or his wife's family did , which actually sounds pretty likely since it's usually considered woman's work to mutilate the girls) would be as extreme as cutting off a guy's dick except that there's no urethra in a girl's clit, so comparing cutting the foreskin to cutting off an entire organ is really offensively inaccurate.
Again no argument with that, no offense meant at all, and I do not believe them to be equal, just the outdated rationale for it.
Originally posted by Trixie
Girls DIE from FGM and it's not commonly performed in a sterile environment by medical professionals; you cannot say the same things of male circ.
This is not a completely true statement. I agree the rates of complications in non sterile environments would be seriously higher, especially in the case of an untrained butcher. There are still risks, such as infection, accidental clipping of the glans (head) and yes even death. Again a very steep risk for the what many people equate with trimming their nails. Click for possible complications
Originally posted by Trixie
Go ahead and protest male circumcision all you want, but don't act like it's the same thing as the chopping and hacking off of women's genitals. It's not. And no, there is absolutely no hygienic reason to do this to women; using that as an excuse is completely backwater stoopid. The people who use that argument are the ones who put baby powder and corn meal and towels in and up women's cunts before they fuck them because they think dry pussy is more pleasurable.
You're right, I absolutely agree with everything you said. It would be more akin to trimming a baby girls labia (or clitoral hood) with no anesthetic, under clinical conditions at birth just to make it look cuter or because some book of fiction told you so.
That happened here in Georgia, and yeah it's fucked up I don't agree with it at all. The really fucked up thing about this is that the mother has known about this the whole time, and not until they were going through a divorce did she bring this up to the authorities.
You mean to tell me she being her mother changing her diapers, and giving the little girl baths (because this happened when the girl was two years old) that she never realized what had happened to her?
Bullshit this is all about the mother taken out her frustrations on a man that was leaving her.
Why didn't the courts do anything to her?
You mean to tell me she didn't know about till a few months ago when they were going through their divorce?
If the dad is going to jail she should as well. She knew about it before, during, and after. She just as guilty for knowing about it and not doing anything.
That happened here in Georgia, and yeah it's fucked up I don't agree with it at all. The really fucked up thing about this is that the mother has known about this the whole time, and not until they were going through a divorce did she bring this up to the authorities.
You mean to tell me she being her mother changing her diapers, and giving the little girl baths (because this happened when the girl was two years old) that she never realized what had happened to her?
Bullshit this is all about the mother taken out her frustrations on a man that was leaving her.
Why didn't the courts do anything to her?
You mean to tell me she didn't know about till a few months ago when they were going through their divorce?
If the dad is going to jail she should as well. She knew about it before, during, and after. She just as guilty for knowing about it and not doing anything.
"Bullshit this is all about the mother taken out her frustrations on a man that was leaving her."
I agree and I wouldnt be surprised if she was the one who done it in the first place
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Comment