does anyone use 35mm anymore?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Dawgy
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 5856
    #1

    does anyone use 35mm anymore?

    ive been experimenting with different cameras and stuff, and i decided to take a few shots using my old 35mm nikon.... to me, the pictures looked better than the digital ones... its like u can kinda tell the digital ones are digital... i was also able to shoot a lot faster too....

    anyone use standard film or slides anymore, then scan from there?
    the revolution is coming.
    Tags: None
    • ADIDAS
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2001
      • 638
      #2
      I know some do, you just have to figure in the cost of film, the processing and the scanning time....

      And most like to shoot on Chrome film, more expensive but better light penetration.

      And then get them on slides and scan those....
      <img src="http://www.sunlightcontent.com/images/sl_but.gif" border=0>

      Professional Video Encoding As Low As $2.00 Per Minute

      ICQ # 125084296

        Comment

        • foe
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 5246
          #3
          I still use 35 mm sometimes mostly digital now, you can see content right away and why use 35mm when you will have to scan the pictures in anyways, just more wokr.

            Comment

            • Dax
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2002
              • 3161
              #4
              I only use 35mm when Im shooting for magazines. When I shoot for my sites, It's 100% digital, only because is less time consuming and is waaaaay less expensive.

                Comment

                • RK
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2001
                  • 868
                  #5
                  IMO, If the pics will end up on the web then it's probably better to shoot them digital since 35 mm --> digital takes time and you loose quality.

                  As for pics that will remain non-digital (actual physical pictures) 35mm is a better choice since the quality of the print is usually higher as well as cheaper and often quicker if you are using a professional (privet) lab. From my experience most professional photographers for events still use 35mm or wider.
                  Does anyone look down here?

                    Comment

                    Previous template Next
                    Working...