iran threatens europe

[Grapesoda]

"You should believe that this regime [Israel] cannot last and has no more benefit to you," Mr Ahmadinejad said, addressing European nations. "We have advised the Europeans that the Americans are far away, but you are the neighbours of the nations in this region.

"We inform you that the nations are like an ocean that is welling up and if a storm begins, the dimensions will not stay limited to Palestine and you may get hurt." He added: "You imposed a group of terrorists ... on the region. It is in your own interest to distance yourself from these criminals. This is an ultimatum. Nations will take revenge."

http://news.scotsman.com/internation...?id=1557672006


I'm sure the nukes are for peacefull use though . .

[DjSap]

let's hope this will stop the fall in the oil prices...

[_xXx_]

hes bluffing

[Rochard]

This is a simple problem really. We need to put our foot down - Hard.

Like this: "The next time you so much as make a threat to Isreal or any other nation we are going to destroy you".

And the next time he so much as whispers anything along the lines of a threat, we nuke their county. Not nuke a city, nuke the entire country.

I'm pretty confident at that point North Korea, Syria, and every one else would suddenly see things our way.

[woj]

Originally Posted by DjSap

let's hope this will stop the fall in the oil prices...

Nothing wrong with falling oil prices... unless you've invested in oil related companies?

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Rochard

This is a simple problem really. We need to put our foot down - Hard.

Like this: "The next time you so much as make a threat to Isreal or any other nation we are going to destroy you".

And the next time he so much as whispers anything along the lines of a threat, we nuke their county. Not nuke a city, nuke the entire country.

I'm pretty confident at that point North Korea, Syria, and every one else would suddenly see things our way.

we can't. . . it isn't politically correct . . the musums would be offended

[Webby]

GFY solutions to the world's problems can never be surpassed - awesome stuff

[DjSap]

Originally Posted by woj

Nothing wrong with falling oil prices... unless you've invested in oil related companies?

local economy is dependant on oil industry, the higher oil is the better as far as I am concerned...

[LiveDose]

It's amazing that right now two ugly ass midgets have the whole planet on edge. I agree with Roc we need to take a tough stand. The real scenario though will be that they will attack first and then while complete chaos is going on in the US or Europe we will eventually respond. Something is definitely going to happen it is just a matter of when.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by _xXx_

hes bluffing

We better hope he is.

[jesse_adultdatingdollars]

Originally Posted by Rochard

This is a simple problem really. We need to put our foot down - Hard.

Like this: "The next time you so much as make a threat to Isreal or any other nation we are going to destroy you".

And the next time he so much as whispers anything along the lines of a threat, we nuke their county. Not nuke a city, nuke the entire country.

I'm pretty confident at that point North Korea, Syria, and every one else would suddenly see things our way.

Not a bad idea.

[Splum]

I hope he does attack... France or some other seriously passive nation. The world will be begging for the USA to help then. Its fucking sickening we have to do the worlds dirty work.

[Webby]

Originally Posted by Splum

Its fucking sickening we have to do the worlds dirty work.

Too funny!

[directfiesta]

[notabook]

Originally Posted by Splum

I hope he does attack... France or some other seriously passive nation. The world will be begging for the USA to help then. Its fucking sickening we have to do the worlds dirty work.

I hope he attacks… America or some other redneck gung-ho country. The USA will be begging the world to help then. Its fucking sickening we have to sell our weaponry to third world nations who end up using it against us years down the line.

[Sly]

Originally Posted by Rochard

This is a simple problem really. We need to put our foot down - Hard.

Like this: "The next time you so much as make a threat to Isreal or any other nation we are going to destroy you".

And the next time he so much as whispers anything along the lines of a threat, we nuke their county. Not nuke a city, nuke the entire country.

I'm pretty confident at that point North Korea, Syria, and every one else would suddenly see things our way.

Well, Israel has been "egging" them on yesterday and today. Whether or not those nudges are justifiable or not is another story, in my opinion they are. Israel looks like they're ready to go it alone, if need be.

Its going to take another attack somewhere before more powers start to unite. Pretty sad if you ask me... as if New York, Spain, and London aren't already enough.

[squishypimp]

i wish the world could just get to a stable point

[Grapesoda]

thomas sowell: The president of Iran was slicker but his speech at the United Nations and his artful evasions at his press conference are also revealing and should be a warning. He too is obviously playing us for fools.


Those in the United States and in other western nations who are urging dialogue with Iran are repeating the tragic mistakes of the 1930s that led to World War II. People say talk is cheap but it can be enormously costly when it becomes just a way to forestall action while an enemy nation builds up its military threat.


Since Iran is not letting the idle chatter at the U.N. delay their rush to get nuclear weapons, they are more dangerous than the Nazis were — while we remain as gullible as those in the west who blundered into World War II and almost lost it.

[OG LennyT]

Originally Posted by Wanton

thomas sowell: The president of Iran was slicker but his speech at the United Nations and his artful evasions at his press conference are also revealing and should be a warning. He too is obviously playing us for fools.


Those in the United States and in other western nations who are urging dialogue with Iran are repeating the tragic mistakes of the 1930s that led to World War II. People say talk is cheap but it can be enormously costly when it becomes just a way to forestall action while an enemy nation builds up its military threat.

Since Iran is not letting the idle chatter at the U.N. delay their rush to get nuclear weapons, they are more dangerous than the Nazis were ? while we remain as gullible as those in the west who blundered into World War II and almost lost it.

good points

[pornguy]

They need to turn that area to glass.

[Pleasurepays]

Originally Posted by Wanton

we can't. . . it isn't politically correct . . the musums would be offended

hahaha

aint that the truth.

[ukxtra]

[MaddCaz]

Ahmenidijad!

[Ace_luffy]

war must be starting...

VIVA Iran and North Korea

[KRL]

[sacX]

Originally Posted by Rochard

This is a simple problem really. We need to put our foot down - Hard.

Like this: "The next time you so much as make a threat to Isreal or any other nation we are going to destroy you".

And the next time he so much as whispers anything along the lines of a threat, we nuke their county. Not nuke a city, nuke the entire country.

I'm pretty confident at that point North Korea, Syria, and every one else would suddenly see things our way.

Yeah well, I'm sure that'd work out well, Russia and China would love the US nuking Iran. Congrats you just destroyed the world.

[DaddyHalbucks]

Clinton snoozed while Al Qaeda threatened us. The leftists in the US still do not understand the dimensions of the problem. 5 years after 9/11, many have fallen asleep again.

The leftists in the US have put our country in grave danger.

The next terrorist strike against the US will be a biggie. This is according to Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri.

It is sad that the US will have to lose a major city before it gets REALLY serious about the threat that radical Islamic fundamentalists pose to our nation. I pray this does not happen, but it looks inevitable. The leftists have weakened us and divided us just enough to allow this to happen.

[fallenmuffin]

World War III is among us; Afgan, Iraq, Iran, Israel, North Korea, UK ... fuck it someone punch a canadian and lets get the party started

[SmokeyTheBear]

i dont see much difference between this and bush threatning to blow anyone up who enters space who he feels is hostile towards usa

[Gillespie]

Originally Posted by sacX

Yeah well, I'm sure that'd work out well, Russia and China would love the US nuking Iran. Congrats you just destroyed the world.

I agree

[Webby]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

The leftists in the US have put our country in grave danger.

The next terrorist strike against the US will be a biggie. This is according to Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri.

It is sad that the US will have to lose a major city before it gets REALLY serious about the threat that radical Islamic fundamentalists pose to our nation. I pray this does not happen, but it looks inevitable. The leftists have weakened us and divided us just enough to allow this to happen.

Oops.. America's favorite sport - division over domestic party politics

Leftists?? (Must mean democrats) Rarely has there been sight of a "leftist" in the US govt for around 5 years.

"The leftists have weakened us and divided us just enough to allow this to happen."?? The "leftists" are not in power - Bush is, and he's not a "leftist", more fascist.

What planet are we on today ??

[Sly]

In other news... the French have fired over a dozen airport personnel on suspicion of "questionable links". All but 2 were Muslim. I smell discrimination!

[seven]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Clinton snoozed while Al Qaeda threatened us. The leftists in the US still do not understand the dimensions of the problem.

Right wing urged al-qaeda to go on a vacation with him while CIA and CT chief warned his national security adviser. Atleast Clinton tried and failed and didn't just go on a blind-eye vacation

Osama still possess a threat to the U.S. cause the right let him. After all, how they gonna induce fear in American people into voting for them without Osama being a threat?

[seven]

Originally Posted by Webby

Leftists?? (Must mean democrats) Rarely has there been sight of a "leftist" in the US govt for around 5 years.

my guess would be that either he lives outside the u.s. (sounds more like he could be from Israel) or he's a new immigrant to the u.s.

[WarChild]

Originally Posted by seven

Osama still possess a threat to the U.S. cause the right let him. After all, how they gonna induce fear in American people into voting for them without Osama being a threat?

Simple, you use the other side's fear tactic and cry "Global Warming!".

[Sly]

Originally Posted by seven

Right wing urged al-qaeda to go on a vacation with him while CIA and CT chief warned his national security adviser. Atleast Clinton tried and failed and didn't just go on a blind-eye vacation

Osama still possess a threat to the U.S. cause the right let him. After all, how they gonna induce fear in American people into voting for them without Osama being a threat?

Osama possesses a threat to most of Western Society. Are you saying the reason the Western World hasn't caught Osama yet is because Bush failed? Wow. Western countries should get some balls and stop depending on the Bush they all so supposedly hate.

How many countries have people in Afghanistan right now hunting down the world famous towelhead? United States, the English, the Dutch, the Canadians...

[Sly]

Originally Posted by WarChild

Simple, you use the other side's fear tactic and cry "Global Warming!".

Let's cry about Kyoto some.

[fucter]

fuck isreal, im tired of our men standin guo for those pussies, theres a reason why they have sucked throughout hstory, let the shieks kill meach other

[WarChild]

Originally Posted by Sly

Let's cry about Kyoto some.

Ahh yes, the great answer to save the World.

The Kyoto Protocol calls for the industrialized countries to cut their greenhouse gas emissions to 5.2% below 1990 emission levels for the period 2005 - 2012. Developing countries do not have to cut emissions.

If Kyoto didn't expire in 2012, the end effect would be to reduce warming by .04 degrees Celsius in the year 2100.

Enviromentalists tell us that's not a fair measurement because the real value will be the protocols that follow Kyoto and ultimately rebalance the enviroment.

Kyoto will never lead to the required cuts of 50% or more by all nations by the mid- to late- 21st century, and the elimination of emissions by the century's end, to meet the goal of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations below a doubling of pre-industrial values.

Oh those terrible, terrible Americans.

[seven]

Originally Posted by Sly

Osama possesses a threat to most of Western Society. Are you saying the reason the Western World hasn't caught Osama yet is because Bush failed? Wow. Western countries should get some balls and stop depending on the Bush they all so supposedly hate.

How many countries have people in Afghanistan right now hunting down the world famous towelhead? United States, the English, the Dutch, the Canadians...

Osama possesses the GREATEST threat to the U.S.. threat to others because of its relations to the U.S. Bush had the greatest chance to get him in afghan.. bush didn't stay the course.. he found false excuses to take a detour to invade Iraq instead of worrying about Osama. So not that he only failed he also did it prolly purposefully so he could keep American fearful so they keep him and his party in power

[Sly]

Originally Posted by WarChild

Ahh yes, the great answer to save the World.

The Kyoto Protocol calls for the industrialized countries to cut their greenhouse gas emissions to 5.2% below 1990 emission levels for the period 2005 - 2012. Developing countries do not have to cut emissions.

If Kyoto didn't expire in 2012, the end effect would be to reduce warming by .04 degrees Celsius in the year 2100.

Enviromentalists tell us that's not a fair measurement because the real value will be the protocols that follow Kyoto and ultimately rebalance the enviroment.

Kyoto will never lead to the required cuts of 50% or more by all nations by the mid- to late- 21st century, and the elimination of emissions by the century's end, to meet the goal of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations below a doubling of pre-industrial values.

Oh those terrible, terrible Americans.

I swear I read something the other day about Canada not reaching Kyota levels to 2025. I should see if I can find what exactly it was, maybe somebody can refresh us here. But just think about that for a second, it takes Canada over 20 years to do it... and the United States is supposed to? I'm all for the environment, lowering emissions, so on and so forth... but it also has to be practical. Hell even the Saviour Hillary wasn't buying Kyota...

[Sly]

Originally Posted by seven

Osama possesses the GREATEST threat to the U.S.. threat to others because of its relations to the U.S. Bush had the greatest chance to get him in afghan.. bush didn't stay the course.. he found false excuses to take a detour to invade Iraq instead of worrying about Osama. So not that he only failed he also did it prolly purposefully so he could keep American fearful so they keep him and his party in power

Oh but of course, Osama is only a problem for the Western World because of the evil United States.

[Pleasurepays]

blah blah blah blah blah... meanwhile an insane theocracy, repeatedly lies about its nuclear amibitions until its too late and at the same time continues to threaten you with the end of the world... but yeah. lets make it about something else. that makes sense. Osama... Bush... Santa Claus... They all have nothing to do with a fanatical theocracy preaching death and destruction to anyone who gets in the their way.

[marketsmart]

after reading this thread, it's easy to see the problem... most people simply dont spend enough time educating themselves on international affairs..

not ragging on anyone who posted, but there are simple answers and complex ones...

the simple answer is war..

the complex answer is long enough to fill pages and pages, yet still be unable to give a concrete answer..

in the end, the world is not large enough for everyone and definately not large enough for differences in religious beliefs, greed, ideologies, etc... we are headed into dark times, filled with war and despair. it's only a question of how quickly the world can rid itself of opposition to the dominating forces. almost since the beginning of civalized man, the world has seen empires rise and fall.. today is no different from the past. the only difference is the ability to communicate rapidly.. we as human beings are no wiser than the romans and the greeks that fought long before us and many others before and after them..

at some point in the future, we as humans will be the ruin of ourselves...

[MarkMan]

Originally Posted by sacX

Yeah well, I'm sure that'd work out well, Russia and China would love the US nuking Iran. Congrats you just destroyed the world.

naa, Russia and china wouldn't do shit..

well Russia.. maybe.. unless someone gets rid of that pudding(lol) their..

but china.. has too much invested in the US to put on a fight for a bunch of crazy suicide religious nutcases..


still marketsmartl you are right .. a human being is a human being and its sad anytime any one of us dies.. especially by another human being .. think about it.. we have natures age and disease to fight .. and instead we kill each other.

[xxxice]

Watch how France and the rest of Europe says it is ok and that they were just talking. What happened in Iraq who was the only death in the bombing of the nuclear plant there.

And then they get attacked what happens ...

No respect

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Sly

Well, Israel has been "egging" them on yesterday and today. Whether or not those nudges are justifiable or not is another story, in my opinion they are. Israel looks like they're ready to go it alone, if need be.

Its going to take another attack somewhere before more powers start to unite. Pretty sad if you ask me... as if New York, Spain, and London aren't already enough.

Isreal has been dealing with this crap since what - the 1950's? They are done being nice and done playing games.

Remember the seven day war? Isreal didn't take on a country, the pretty much took on the entire middle east. Isreal ran circles around them, owned them; Everyone was begging them to stop and they kept taking more and more land.

This is why they went into Lebanon. You have terroritsts - that's right, terrorists - who are launching MISSILES into another country while hiding behind someone else's borders. Isreal doesn't care where this is coming from, they care about who it's coming from - and in case no one noticed international borders have less and less value every day.

This needs to stop and the only way it's going to stop is if someone sends a very strong message saying "ENOUGH ALREADY". The US has taken down two Middle Eastern countries and it still hasn't changed. What needs to be done is someone needs to say "you cross this line and we are taking your country and enslaving your entire population" - None of this "new government crap".

[Webby]

Originally Posted by marketsmart

after reading this thread, it's easy to see the problem... most people simply dont spend enough time educating themselves on international affairs..

You think?

[OG LennyT]

smells shitty to me

[northboy]

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad looks like a monkey