50 nuke experts........ :arcadefre

dipshit, you should stop and get yer ass out of yer mouth . . .

gald you posted that hommy . . the world has been wondering how to get rid or radioacive waste and according to you we can just 'burn it up' and all move on :thumbsup

http://www.nukem.de/global/downloads/englisch/Incineration.pdf#search='radioactive%20waste%20inc ineration'

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.b...osti_id=637813

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story...987582,00.html

http://www.trwnews.net/Documents/News/bct062603.htm


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


PS: Please keep in mind that there is no incinerator on earth that burns as hot as an exploding ammo dump because the fucking thing would blow up and burn just like the ammo dump. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.nukem.de/global/downloads/englisch/Incineration.pdf#search='radioactive%20waste%20inc ineration'

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.b...osti_id=637813

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story...987582,00.html

http://www.trwnews.net/Documents/News/bct062603.htm


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.nukem.de/global/downloads/englisch/Incineration.pdf#search='radioactive%20waste%20inc ineration'

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.b...osti_id=637813

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story...987582,00.html

http://www.trwnews.net/Documents/News/bct062603.htm

Hello, idiots!!!

We can't use a bomb to create a burning pit to dispose of waste, it's not that it will not work. It's just too fucked up of a method.

But one was created when the ammo dump incinerated itself.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hmm the heat from a nuke should clean itself up right? :uhoh Please continue. This is enlightening. :thumbsup

"However, there are few incinerators designed to accommodate radioactive wastes. One has been recently built at the Savannah River Site (SRS) near Aiken, SC and is burning non-radioactive hazardous waste and radioactive wastes in successive campaigns"

To a degree the nuke does clean itself with heat but the radioactive waste rises in the cloud before it can be fully destroyed and while a small cloud(like the one in the vid) can dissipate easily, a large nuke cloud will spread the "fall out".

Thus the ability to use a "Tacitcal Nuke"...it produces limited fall out to not harm the environment significatly yet yeaild a high level blast.

Dude, our tanks use uranium base shells in the big front gun and no one is worried about fall out from our tanks.

You need to put shit on a scale here. Don't comapre a 15 mega ton nukes like dropped on Hiroshima with a 1/2 ton tactical nuke. They aint even in the same fucking ball park yet you are trying to attribute affects from meg blast to that in the video.


The "Big nuke" actully burns up the ground beneath it because of the heat, a tactical nuke cant fucking do that. The burnt up ground is what creates all the radioactive fall out that we all fear will end the world.

That's why the nukes dropped on Japan were "air burst"; meaning they exploded above the ground. These bombs never hit the ground because the US didn't want to scorch the ground to create more radioactive fall out.

And because there are "a few" this means fucking what??
Duh...that there are none, even though there are a few?????

What was the logic behind posting what everyone else read and understood.

Put the fucking joint down.

These incinerators don't burn as hot as a ammo dump and the only point in posting that about incinerators was to show that it is effective.

im not sure on this one.

but to hear some of the logic from certain people here im kinda shocked.

burning radioactive materials if not done correctly..would just spread it aroundey would have some small nukes over there..not there to b e friends...there to take shit over and keep power

makes sense that th

the logic shown by some here are the same guys who claim to be experts everywhere else..but probably all scored low c's in physics

you know who you are

Poor Japanese :( Though through our radioactive blasts did we stop the horror that is Godzilla, at least for a time.

This place is getting crazier by the minutes ....

isn't that what created godzilla?

Was that a typo?? You mean seconds df? :winkwink:

:1orglaugh

maybe even nanoseconds .. :thumbsup

Did you stay and watch that for proof? I guy i knew did that and now he's six feet under with no chest bones

Look interracialtoons, I went to Ft. McClellan too. Of course, I was there at the Marine detachment for MP school, CID and Breacher's school. But I picked up a few good things about NBC from friends.

While I agree with what you're saying and I agree that I think it was a tactical nuke too. There's absolutely no way to know. If it did happen, it would be covered up immediately and throughly. Even if we had a tactical nuke in Iraq, in an ammo dump...so what?

I spent 2 1/2 years on a base in NC with 40+ minuteman, transcontinental nukes in a "secret" area in the back of the ammo dump that everybody the base and in the town knew about.

Like you said, just 'cause we had it doesn't mean we used it. Accidents happen and ammo dumps burn and blow up the ammo. It's not like you're going to talk a firefighter into going into an ammo fire to spray some water. HA!

Relax dude...it's just not that important to get all fired up over.

interesting video to say the least.

Now Im hearing this was a US base that got hit. 300 US guys got smoked.

Hard to say.. something is weird about that story.

Sure.. the explosion happened and it blew a large area in that region and caused tremors in towns miles away.

The silence is deafening on news media - considering Fort Falcon was a major facility with a fairly dense number of bodies moving around.

Also strange there was at least 100 Iraqi troops and/or police killed plus around 12 translators - but not one US casuality??

Smells like hell - think we may hear more yet. There are other comments by the admin that suggest a background problem - time will tell.

Link????!?!

That quote of 300 and a billion in damage came from this thread

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=668975

That was the point at which the quote was questioned PK - and, the lack of media covering *any* activity sounds weird.

Some brief media statements have suggested either around a billion in damage or slightly more than a billion and also quoted a US spokesman as saying their were no casualties.

Considering the local casualties - this claim is suspect. The explosions were massive.

If 300 soldiers died, someone would know. I'm sorry, but you just can't cover that shit up.

Do you have a link to the article that they are pulling this 300 and a billion in damages though?

Sure.. you'd think there is no chance in hell of hiding that. The flip side is that it also not credible that there are no US casualities - 99.9% impossible unless the place was empty.

Dunno why - got the smell of a silence somewhere. Also suspect some vague comments by the admin over the last few weeks or so which makes ya wonder why a change of stance on Iraq in a very short time. Only way that attack would "need" to be covered is simply because of "political expediency" (elections) or something much bigger. Who knows? Could just be a freak.

No.. no links to that post by Storm_Tracker, but would be interested in seeing that too and checking out the guys references.

The article was written by Henry Makow. That should put an end to any truth that might have been in the article.

Ya got there before me! :thumbsup

This thread is getting a lil old, assumptions are worthless and there is 0 percent proof these are nukes....

If that was a Nuke then where is the EMP? I was expecting to at least see some lights go out in the area but, nothing.

Another Disastrous Coverup

Forward Base Falcon Disaster

by Brian Harring

Baghdad's sky is illuminated by huge explosions in the Iraqi capital (pic AAP)

Late on the evening of October 10, 2006, Iraqi resistance groups lobbed mortar and rocket rounds into the immense ?Forward Base Falcon,? the largest American military base in Iraq, located 13 km south of the Green Zone in Baghdad. In addition to accurate mortar fire, Grad and Katyusha rockets were also used.

Falcon base was designed to house a large contingent of American troops, mostly drawn from the 4th Infantry Division, stationed at Fr. Bliss, Texas. At the time of the attack, there were approximately 3000 men inside the camp, which also was filled with ammunition supplies, fuel, tanks and vehicles.

Iraqi contractors had assisted in the construction of the camp, which occupied nearly a square mile and was surrounded with guard tower-studded high concrete walls, and it is now apparent that the Resistance movement had been given important targets from ?sources familiar with the layout? of the base.

After the initial shelling, fuel and ammunition stores began to erupt with massive explosions that could be heard, and seen, miles away inside the Green Zone where U.S. military and diplomatic units were heavily guarded.

The explosions, all of them termed ?immense? by BBC reporters, continued throughout the night.

In response, US aircraft indiscriminately rocketed and bombed various parts of the city, BBC and AFP correspondents eported, trying to knock out the launch sites of the rockets

The BBC's Andrew North, in Baghdad, said the explosions started at about 2300 (2100 BST) and were becoming "ever more frequent" as the huge fires spread throughout the base, punctuated by tremendous explosions as more fuel and ammunition dumps ignited.

?Intelligence indicates that civilians aligned with a militia organization were responsible for last night?s mortar attack,? said Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Withington, spokesman for the U.S. 4th Infantry Division.

An after action report, issued by the Department of Defense, stated that: ?On October 10, 2006, at approximately 10:40 p.m., a 82mm mortar round, fired by militia forces from a residential area in Abu T-Shir, caused a fire at an Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) at FOB Falcon. The ASP, containing tank and artillery rounds, in addition to smaller caliber ammunition, set off a series of large explosions. About 100 troops from the 4th Infantry Division were reported to be stationed at the base at the time, but no injuries were reported.? (Emphasis added.) "The damage to the area will not degrade the operational capability of MND-B (Multinational Division Baghdad),"

When the flames had been brought under control on the morning of the 11th of October, primarily because the entire camp had been gutted, nine large American military transports with prominent Red Cross markings were observed by members of the foreign media taking off, laded with the dead and the wounded.

Over 300 American troops, including U.S. Army and Marines, CIA agents and U.S. translators were casualties and there also were 165 seriously injured requiring major medical attention and 39 suffering lesser injuries 122 members of the Iraqi armed forces were killed and 90 seriously injured members of same, were also evacuated to the U.S. military hospital at al-Habbaniyah located some 70km west of Baghdad.

Satellite pictures and aerial photographs from neutral sources showed that Camp Falcon suffered major structural damage and almost all the U.S. military?s supply of small arms ammunition, artillery and rocket rounds, tons of fuel, six Apache helicopters, an uncounted but large number of soft-skinned vehicles such as Humvees and supply trucks were damaged or totally destroyed. Foreign press observers noted ?an endless parade? of military vehicle recovery units dragging burnt-out heavy tanks and armored personnel carriers to another base outside Baghdad.

Many of the walls and towers of the camp were damaged or leveled as were many of the barracks, maintenance depots, and there was considerable damage to the huge mess halls that could hold 3000 soldiers, the huge recreation center with its basketball courts and indoor swimming pools and all the administration buildings

Although official U.S. DoD statements indicated that there were no deaths; that only a hundred men were inside the base guarding billions of dollars of vital military equipment and that there were ?only two minor injuries to personnel,? passes belief and certainly reality is more painful than propaganda.

Not only has the U.S. military machine lost much of its armor and transport, and its entire reserves of ammunition and special fuel, but the casualty list for only the first day is over 300..

Here is a transcription of that list who were evacuated to other hospital units:.

In re: Insurgent attacks on Forward Base Falcon on 10-11 October, 2006

Official Casualty List from U.S. military hospital at al-Habbaniyah located some 70km west of Baghdad. U.S. medical personnel at al-Habbaniyah initially stated that the US military hospital at the massive American-occupied air base there had begun to receive dead and wounded personnel. The military hospital in al-Habbaniyah, the largest in occupied Iraq, was opened on 12 May this year in response to sharply rising (and redacted) US casualties.

Interracial toons, give it up. You must know by now the majority of people on GFY are barely making minimum wage selling porn, but somehow are experts on everything, just as long as the USA is never to blame for anything. Regardless of what law passes or what happens, the USA is perfect, nothing wrong will ever happen in the USA.. Not to mention they are mostly elitist bootlicking spineless, fat jellyfish here. Face the facts, you're arguing with the wall. :2 cents:

have done search on this topic and here is a comment that is very important!
on you tube!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uRJw2x-Da10

Who ever posted this does not know what rhey are talking about. This happened at FOB Warrior in Kirkuk in the summer of 2004. The main unit that was there was 2 BCT, 25th ID out of Hawaii. I was there when this happened and I was with 2-11 FA.

I've seen high order detinations that can create mushroom cloud effects. Besides all nukes are designed to withstand intense heat.
Lastly, It is impossible for a nuclear weapon to exploded merely of heat, the high explosive chain must be detonated at a very specific sequence to achieve any kind of yield.

WOW those you claiming to be ex-military and are claiming this to be a nuke sure are full of shit.
Forget your lens flare/over exposure let's talk nuclear physics for a second, first and foremost a nuclear weapon will not cause a fission/fussion explosion by an outside detonation.
Example, you can lay a nuclear bomb out on a tarmac and drop ordinance on it and while you might destroy the weapon a nuclear explosion will not happen, worst case scenario would be a "dirt bomb".

As for DU shells used in M1 tanks, they are made from waste from a nuclear power plant, they dont cause a fission/fussion reactions like a nuclear weapon would so the comparion is apples and oranges.

and extremely bright explosions such as the movie could be white phosphorus........

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Nope, that's what they WANTED you to think. Godzilla was genetically engineered by Japanese scientists in order to combat global warming but the project spiraled out of control and soon the scientists had no control over the monstrosity. When Godzilla attacked Pearl Harbor in a fit of rage, we sought to stop his terror once and for all and hit him with our most powerful weapon of mass destruction at the time; unfortunately, it wasn't enough to stop the monster but we did force him into sort of a coma. He'll return to seek revenge one day but for now we are safe.