Rush Limbaugh blames the Foley scandal on the pages

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mardigras
    Bon temps!
    • Feb 2003
    • 14194

    #1

    Rush Limbaugh blames the Foley scandal on the pages

    Capitol Hill Pages, Paragons of Virtue?
    Bottom line is, they all have to be pretty smart, and they're probably thus typically like many teenagers. And you know teenagers can be mean. They haven't yet had the maturity to understand sensitivity and decency, love making fun of people, they walk around mimicking the way they walk, they make fun of the way people look, and they'll do it sometimes to their faces. So you can imagine that the word's out on Foley. I can see where some of these pages would just have more fun than a human being could be allowed to have trying to titillate the poor guy, into sending him all this stuff. None of them ever met with the guy, apparently, and what does that tell us? He tried, come on over for a massage, come over for an adult beverage, according to the IMs, but none of them ever met with him, it seems like, privately. But it seems like someone just had a grand old time teasing the guy and getting their jollies, and they print out their instant messages to show everybody, to get a yuk and a laugh.
    The front page of Limbaugh's website is currently full of desperate stories trying to place the blame for this everywhere but where it belongs. Apparently the Studds incident entitles the Republicans to one free pedophile The top of his home page is all articles blasting the Dems for "gay bashing" and "outing". Funny stuff until you think of how many dittoheads there are out there.
    .
  • GrouchyAdmin
    Now choke yourself!
    • Apr 2006
    • 12085

    #2
    "If they didn't have such cute little asses", claims Rush, in vehemet defense, "...he wouldn't have been tempted!"

    Comment

    • xNetworx
      So Fucking What
      • Jan 2004
      • 14445

      #3
      Republicans are evil

      Comment

      • Machete_
        WINNING!
        • Oct 2002
        • 14579

        #4
        "• Remember Democrats rallying around Clinton and urging him not to resign? "

        uhhmm.. clinton had sex with a 23 year old woman. Foley tryed to fuck 15-17 year old boys. How the fuck can he even TRY to compare that?

        Comment

        • GrouchyAdmin
          Now choke yourself!
          • Apr 2006
          • 12085

          #5
          Originally posted by ebus_dk
          uhhmm.. clinton had sex with a 23 year old woman. Foley tryed to fuck 15-17 year old boys. How the fuck can he even TRY to compare that?
          Neither one was successful at penetration, so it wasn't sex.

          Comment

          • Machete_
            WINNING!
            • Oct 2002
            • 14579

            #6
            Originally posted by toonpornblog
            Neither one was successful at penetration, so it wasn't sex.
            So if a Pedophile don't get to stick his dick inside the kid, he is not a pedo?

            I disagree

            Comment

            • marketsmart
              HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
              • Dec 2004
              • 20419

              #7
              Originally posted by pimpporn
              Republicans are evil
              well said

              Comment

              • GrouchyAdmin
                Now choke yourself!
                • Apr 2006
                • 12085

                #8
                Originally posted by ebus_dk
                So if a Pedophile don't get to stick his dick inside the kid, he is not a pedo?
                No, you did miss the entire point.

                Comment

                • Machete_
                  WINNING!
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 14579

                  #9
                  Originally posted by toonpornblog
                  No, you did miss the entire point.

                  ok.. I don't care. Politician, priests and teachers.. they are all the same

                  Comment

                  • spanky part 2
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 1981

                    #10
                    I saw today that the repubs are now blaming the dems for leaking the info. When the representative was cornered for some facts supporting his theory, his response was "can you prove they didn't".

                    The best part for me is, even if they did leak it, thank god! This shit shouldn't happen, and knowing that they covered it up just to protect their majority is so fucking wrong on so many levels.

                    Personally I wish they would throw every fucking house member and senator out, and start all over with 8 year term limits.

                    Comment

                    • BusterBunny
                      perverted justice decoy
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 19291

                      #11
                      rush owes me money for oxycontin.....
                      my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died

                      Comment

                      • mardigras
                        Bon temps!
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 14194

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BusterBunny
                        rush owes me money for oxycontin.....
                        LOL, if you go to limbaugh.com (not rushlimbaugh.com which is his actual site) they have links to buy Oxycontin and Viagra, and also links for drug addictions and treatment centers
                        .

                        Comment

                        • L-Pink
                          working on my tan
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 39151

                          #13
                          Originally posted by pimpporn
                          Republicans are evil

                          Comment

                          • mardigras
                            Bon temps!
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 14194

                            #14
                            Originally posted by L-Pink
                            I suppose that entitles the republicans to one free serial killer too?
                            .

                            Comment

                            • mardigras
                              Bon temps!
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 14194

                              #15
                              Rush is counting on the ignorance of the American public to carry the day November 7

                              There's one poll going around out there that in fact, I don't know who it was, but it was a Republican pollster went and talked to some members of the House and said you guys are going to lose 50 seats if Hastert doesn't resign.

                              Now, I just refuse to believe it, because I don't think, even after this week of attention, there are that many Americans who know who Hastert is, to make him and whether he's in office or not an electoral issue for their whole House and for their candidate in their districts.
                              http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...ain.guest.html
                              .

                              Comment

                              • montel
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2001
                                • 2606

                                #16
                                Originally posted by ebus_dk
                                "uhhmm.. clinton had sex with a 23 year old woman. Foley tryed to fuck 15-17 year old boys. How the fuck can he even TRY to compare that?
                                can any republicans please comment on this?
                                Barefootsies

                                Comment

                                • Quagmire
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jul 2005
                                  • 6490

                                  #17
                                  Whether they were teasing him or not, it doesn't change the fact that he was talking with minors in that way.

                                  Its irritating that the Republicans would even attempt to refer to the information coming to light as a leak. It implies that they never intended for it to see the light of day. His actions were wrong and need to be addressed.

                                  Comment

                                  • mardigras
                                    Bon temps!
                                    • Feb 2003
                                    • 14194

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by montel
                                    can any republicans please comment on this?
                                    Don't expect any Republicans in this thread unless it is to sling 20+ year old dirt
                                    .

                                    Comment

                                    • mardigras
                                      Bon temps!
                                      • Feb 2003
                                      • 14194

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Quagmire
                                      Whether they were teasing him or not, it doesn't change the fact that he was talking with minors in that way.
                                      Absolutely. Anyone who has read those message transcripts can clearly see that Foley is the one who tried to turn every topic back to sex.
                                      Originally posted by Quagmire
                                      Its irritating that the Republicans would even attempt to refer to the information coming to light as a leak. It implies that they never intended for it to see the light of day.
                                      The word "leak" does tend to imply secrecy or confidentiality, doesn't it
                                      .

                                      Comment

                                      Working...