how many times have you seen links to wikipedia in message boards, blogs, websites of all varieties?
I'd say that all of those non-recips would hold quite a bit of weight along with the relevance.. I'm sure there are numerous other reasons - but those would bode well with google IMO.
TripleXPrint on Megan Fox "I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"
a *LOT* of those backlinks are from wikipedia.org pages, but i cant figure a way to filter them out.. the TSV export only exports that page.. not the whole result set.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
The real truth is that wikipedia met google at a show once and shook his hand. Now they both consider each other top notch guys and send their traffic to one another.
Google has always favored large, original content authority sites such as Wikipedia. Couple that with the enormous amount of backlinks and its bound to get top listings really easily.
WG
Comment