Question: Do you like uncircumcised penises??

Man, i tried to make a poll but it didnt work

I had it taken off at 13 cause i hated it.

Eew no uncircumcised penis for me.

Nastah!

Every time I see this topic I sigh on behalf of humanity.
The fact that one is natural etc etc asides, the long and the short of it as soon as they're erect.. the both look identical.

If you've got issues either way, you've got issues.

the only uncut dick i like is my own

Cut is the only way to be...

i dont like any type of penises.

phewwww... i'm safe then

as long as its clean

I dont mind as long as its clean. They tend to be fatter too.

uncut

sorry i aint gay

"suck dick you fucking whore"

~ (c) bushwick bill 2005

amen brotha... look, shaving a pussy is something different.... but cutting a fucking piece a skin off your dick aint natural at all, and it just gotta hurt big time..... its fucking weird

pics please

I don't care. Natural is alright for me.

I like my penis to be natural

I don't care, as I'm not a girl or gay, but circumcised penis look nicer to look at.

Mine is uncut also and it has NEVER givin my problems.

its a hygene thing. if you keep it clean then you shouldnt have a problem. i personally am cut and liking it. not that i would know the difference,lol.

MY is also uncut.

Maybe its not the uncircumsized thats the problem, but maybe its too short.



.

Thats okay its not your fault, no need to apologize

Regards,

Lee

Well, when you do it in your kitchen with a sharp edge of a rusty can... then it will hurt. Ever heard of narcosis?

I love cocks in all shapes and sizes

I like my own penis

Well said.
It's inhumane imo. They cut of the foreskin of baby boys because parents were too fucking lazy to clean them properly or teach them how to clean it.
So they cut it off and there was less infections and such.

Look at girls. How many little nook and crannies do we have down there? We would never lop our lips off. Learn to CLEAN it and you'll be fine

Just a few things to think about:

Circumcised Penis Requires More Care in Young Boys

The circumcised penis requires more care than the intact penis during the first three years of life, according to a report in the British Journal of Urology. The clinical findings of an American pediatrician showed that circumcised boys were significantly more likely to have skin adhesions, trapped debris, irritated urinary opening, and inflammation of the glans (head of the penis) than were boys with a foreskin. Furthermore, because there are large variations of appearance in circumcised boys, circumcision for cosmetic reasons should be discouraged.

Circumcision Results in Significant Loss of Erogenous Tissue

A report published in the British Journal of Urology assessed the type and amount of tissue missing from the adult circumcised penis by examining adult foreskins obtained at autopsy. Investigators found that circumcision removes about one-half of the erogenous tissue on the penile shaft. The foreskin, according to the study, protects the head of the penis and is comprised of unique zones with several kinds of specialized nerves that are important to optimum sexual sensitivity.

Researchers Demonstrate Traumatic Effects of Circumcision

A team of Canadian researchers produced new evidence that circumcision has long-lasting traumatic effects. An article published in the international medical journal The Lancet reported the effect of infant circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. The researchers tested 87 infants at 4 months or 6 months of age. The boys who had been circumcised were more sensitive to pain than the uncircumcised boys. Differences between groups were significant regarding facial action, crying time, and assessments of pain.

The authors believe that "neonatal circumcision may induce long-lasting changes in infant pain behavior because of alterations in the infant?s central neural processing of painful stimuli." They also write that "the long-term consequences of surgery done without anaesthesia are likely to include post-traumatic stress as well as pain. It is therefore possible that the greater vaccination response in the infants circumcised without anaesthesia may represent an infant analogue of a post-traumatic stress disorder triggered by a traumatic and painful event and re-experienced under similar circumstances of pain during vaccination."

Circumcision Study Halted Due to Trauma

Researchers found circumcision so traumatic that they ended the study early rather than subject any more infants to the operation without anesthesia. Those infants circumcised without anesthesia experienced not only severe pain, but also an increased risk of choking and difficulty breathing. The findings were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Up to 96% of infants in some areas of the United States receive no anesthesia during circumcision. No anesthetic currently in use for circumcisions is effective during the most painful parts of the procedure.

Psychological Effects of Circumcision Studied

An article titled "The Psychological Impact of Circumcision" reports that circumcision results in behavioral changes in infants and long-term unrecognized psychological effects on men. The piece reviews the medical literature on infants? responses to circumcision and concludes, "there is strong evidence that circumcision is overwhelmingly painful and traumatic." The article notes that infants exhibit behavioral changes after circumcision, and some men have strong feelings of anger, shame, distrust, and grief about having been circumcised. In addition, circumcision has been shown to disrupt the mother-infant bond, and some mothers report significant distress after allowing their son to be circumcised. Psychological factors perpetuate circumcision. According to the author, "defending circumcision requires minimizing or dismissing the harm and producing overstated medical claims about protection from future harm. The ongoing denial requires the acceptance of false beliefs and misunderstanding of facts. These psychological factors affect professionals, members of religious groups, and parents involved in the practice."

Expressions from circumcised men are generally lacking because most circumcised men do not understand what circumcision is, emotional repression keeps feelings from awareness, or men may be aware of these feelings but afraid of disclosure.

If you've gotten to reading this congrats, I'm impressed

They use to cover it in Canada a few years ago but for some reason decided to make you pay $250.

It was all about cleanliness. As I said above, back then talking about penises and vaginas was taboo as far as I know. So instead of the parents being taught how to properly clean it, they deided to cut the foreskin off so they wouldn't have to worry about such dirty talks with their children


It's not right.

female genital mutilation

Yea, im glad i have my hoddy on.

i prefer my uncut penis thanks...

they claim it does not hurt babys but they just cry and cant tell you...you whip it out and cut some skin off...see if it hurts you now

plus i dont see any reason to do it

Apart from a few indoctrinated people in the middle east, the US and their (former) colonies like the Philippines, people don't get cut.

I prefer cut :P looks clean

I was down the pub with a few of my female friends last night and of course penis's came up =/ It's a different culture over here they said they'd both slept with 1 person who was circumcised and they thought it was weird. I think the circumcision rate over here is 1/10 or something.

I don't like any penis

being un-cut makes you more likely to get aids from what I've heard. Something about micro-tears or some shit.

I'm proud to be cut

I heard the save thing. kinda like the skin is a backup defence if the condom doesn't work.

if it was in any way of the slightest benefit to be circumsised, evolution would have ensured that we were born without a foreskin. but mother nature has ensured we're born with one which means it's beneficial. all the talk about cleanliness with a cut dick is rubbish, the foreskin is there to keep the dick clean not the other way round.

Smegma can cause skin cancer.. so if you wanna have a clean and cancer free dick, circumcize is the answer! hope to enlighten your minds regarding this matter.. ciao

Hell no, its not the same...circumcised dicks are so much more fun to blow

i like mine but i dont really got that much skin like i see in pics and shit so i dunno

fries causes cancer
potato ships causes cancer
cigarettes cause cancer
etc etc etc.....

Un-cut, and happy to stay that way...

i love how people have such strong stances on it "ITS THE NATRUAL & MORE PLEASURABLE WAY!" "NO IT IS UNHEALTHY AND DANGEROUS!".... it is so not pathetic at all

Thats not true at all!!

Only a few foreskins retract with an erection.

my penis needs to quit smoking i guess

I've dated two guys that were uncut.

The sex was great, both were able to last longer.

You just need to shower and clean more often, heh.

US parents are having their kids circumsized a LOT less often these days. I think for guys who are 20 or under, probably somewhere between 20 and 40% in the US are uncut, vs about 3 or 4% 20 years ago.

I'd better. I have one.