DEA...i was not going to post in here to give you the benefit of the doubt...BUT just to prove a point i will...you see anyone is welcome to prove we shave....but the fact that one posts about it with no proof should get one banned....will this be tha case?
Does Ian ever publicly tell people that you guys shave? If he, as owner of all your programs and shell programs, has done so I don't think you can get someone banned for talking about it.
DEA...i was not going to post in here to give you the benefit of the doubt...BUT just to prove a point i will...you see anyone is welcome to prove we shave....but the fact that one posts about it with no proof should get one banned....will this be tha case?
dunno...after all..this IS gfy.....
Im entitled to my opinoin.,I asked nobody take my word for it stated i am a nobody here, also i suggested webmasters to find out for themselves by getting sales for your program. You have nothing to lose by my thread .Only more sales and new webmasters to gain. Suggesting i get banned for stating my opinoin on your prgram is rediculous.There are many threads dealing with webmasters/programs that claim one another is doing shady buissness.Are you trying to place epic on some kind of pedestal on gfy .....Although.. the epic crew does smear the board with usless childish threads making personal attacks and posting garbage here day after day..hmmmm....maybe your right i should be banned for even thinking about posting a thread so horrible and demeaning to the epic program..WTF was i thinking
Im entitled to my opinoin.,I asked nobody take my word for it stated i am a nobody here, also i suggested webmasters to find out for themselves by getting sales for your program. You have nothing to lose by my thread .Only more sales and new webmasters to gain. Suggesting i get banned for stating my opinoin on your prgram is rediculous.There are many threads dealing with webmasters/programs that claim one another is doing shady buissness.Are you trying to place epic on some kind of pedestal on gfy .....Although.. the epic crew does smear the board with usless childish threads making personal attacks and posting garbage here day after day..hmmmm....maybe your right i should be banned for even thinking about posting a thread so horrible and demeaning to the epic program..WTF was i thinking
LOL that is pretty funny...you see this is exactly why we are doing what we are doing...level playing field.....bring it on webmasters.....
when DEA is proven wrong i will be the first to point it out...if hes not banned
Looks like DEA is doing another test. Testing the exact application of the rules it would seem. Making a claim and then saying don't take my word for it.
If you're going to make a statement like that, why not follow through with your proof? It would make for bigger drama yet.
Real proof would have to include a printout of an email or ICQ inquiring as to the error etc. and advising of your test. Did you do a trial or was this a full join? Did you gain access to the members area?
Let's say a person was standing in the presence of Ian Eisenberg, the man behind the curtain for Epic Cash et al, when Ian bragged that all of Epic Cash programs and shell programs shave. Let's say that Ian also said one of his employees was even let go for beginning to drive the company into the ground by setting the shave a little too high and making it more obvious than even Ian was comfortable with...
In this hypothetical situation, do you think a person's personal conversation could be considered proof under any circumstances? Probably not, eh?
I am entitled to my opinoin and asked that my word NOT be taken .
Also not sure what rule i broke if any?
Under GFY Rules FAQ
Q: Someone really pissed me off. I want to slam them on the board. Is this cool?
A: First off make sure you have substance to do so. Show some proof. We all want to know who is dirty. And lets keep it Mono y Mono, leave the innocent bystanders out of the fray.
Let's say a person was standing in the presence of Ian Eisenberg, the man behind the curtain for Epic Cash et al, when Ian bragged that all of Epic Cash programs and shell programs shave. Let's say that Ian also said one of his employees was even let go for beginning to drive the company into the ground by setting the shave a little too high and making it more obvious than even Ian was comfortable with...
In this hypothetical situation, do you think a person's personal conversation could be considered proof under any circumstances? Probably not, eh?
You're such a fucking douche lately Donny.
#1: Do you have a RECORDING of that conversation?
#2: Are you aware the most of the "shell programs" you are spewing about have Nats?
#3: Why are you so fucking fat?
Looks like DEA is doing another test. Testing the exact application of the rules it would seem. Making a claim and then saying don't take my word for it.
If you're going to make a statement like that, why not follow through with your proof? It would make for bigger drama yet.
Real proof would have to include a printout of an email or ICQ inquiring as to the error etc. and advising of your test. Did you do a trial or was this a full join? Did you gain access to the members area?
Actually i have no clue if i broke a rule or not. ..wasnt testing anything ..nor am i trying to start major drama..theres enough usless crap on the boards latley dealing with this program.....i have a right to my opinoin and thats what it is my opinoin
Considering i asked NOT to be belived i see no point in offering any proof...why would anyone want proof of something from a person who clearly stated they didnt want anyone to belive them in the first place?
#1: Do you have a RECORDING of that conversation?
#2: Are you aware the most of the "shell programs" you are spewing about have Nats?
#3: Why are you so fucking fat?
Man, why are your panties all in a bunch over that? I said at the start of my post that it was just a "hypothetical situation" wink wink nudge nudge.
Actually i have no clue if i broke a rule or not. ..wasnt testing anything ..nor am i trying to start major drama..theres enough usless crap on the boards latley dealing with this program.....i have a right to my opinoin and thats what it is my opinoin
Considering i asked NOT to be belived i see no point in offering any proof...why would anyone want proof of something from a person who clearly stated they didnt want anyone to belive them in the first place?
Man, why are your panties all in a bunch over that? I said at the start of my post that it was just a "hypothetical situation" wink wink nudge nudge.
Answer the questions fat boy and stop trying to be "clever". It doesnt suit you. I just wanna know how you can even "hypothetically" suggest that a program with Nats can shave.
You need to go take some fucking pictures and stop pretending that you know a god damned thing about how a program functions.
Actually i have no clue if i broke a rule or not. ..wasnt testing anything ..nor am i trying to start major drama..theres enough usless crap on the boards latley dealing with this program.....i have a right to my opinoin and thats what it is my opinoin
Considering i asked NOT to be belived i see no point in offering any proof...why would anyone want proof of something from a person who clearly stated they didnt want anyone to belive them in the first place?
Not that no one else has ever done this type of thing before, but the title to your thread certainly draws attention.
Why is he banned JTF? You cant stop moaning to the teacher as usual?
Answer the questions fat boy and stop trying to be "clever". It doesnt suit you. I just wanna know how you can even "hypothetically" suggest that a program with Nats can shave.
You need to go take some fucking pictures and stop pretending that you know a god damned thing about how a program functions
OMG - I am going to have so much fun with this - Do NATS know you are bringing this up again? I think not!!
Hey P1mpdog - you havnt told your boy when to shut the fuck up yet?
Answer the questions fat boy and stop trying to be "clever". It doesnt suit you. I just wanna know how you can even "hypothetically" suggest that a program with Nats can shave.
You need to go take some fucking pictures and stop pretending that you know a god damned thing about how a program functions.
A program with NATs could shave if the sponsor gave out the wrong NATs ID for their link codes. If they provided FHGs with the wrong NATs ID the same result. If the sponsor offered hot linked full page ads etc.I AM NOT saying that Epic did this.
That's some examples and really off topic for the thread. We could go from there, but why give a class on cheating.
A program with NATs could shave if the sponsor gave out the wrong NATs ID for their link codes. If they provided FHGs with the wrong NATs ID the same result. If the sponsor offered hot linked full page ads etc.I AM NOT saying that Epic did this.
That's some examples and really off topic for the thread. We could go from there, but why give a class on cheating.
All that has nothing to do with NATs itself now. I don't need to jump into the NATS drama.
A program with NATs could shave if the sponsor gave out the wrong NATs ID for their link codes. If they provided FHGs with the wrong NATs ID the same result. If the sponsor offered hot linked full page ads etc.I AM NOT saying that Epic did this.
That's some examples and really off topic for the thread. We could go from there, but why give a class on cheating.
Everyone knows that NATS is shaving - it was shown here a few weeks ago.
Q: Someone really pissed me off. I want to slam them on the board. Is this cool?
A: First off make sure you have substance to do so. Show some proof. We all want to know who is dirty. And lets keep it Mono y Mono, leave the innocent bystanders out of the fray.
Prove it DEA or get banned. It really is that simple.
Prove it DEA or get banned. It really is that simple.
Opinoins are just that opinoins..thye dont need to be proved..especially when asked not to be belived by the persoin voicing the opinoin.
My opinoin is your life is gfy ....you eat sleep and jerkoff to gfy....and you have very little life outside the confines of this domain.... Do i need to prove that to?
Do you have proof he licks Treys banana? if not..well you know....
I have nothing against Epic nore EPicJim (i think he's a good guy in my book)
But Jim the monkey, well he's just a blatant banana monkey to me who although tries hard, will never be close to what P1mpdogg could do to real someone up.
His blatant attacks on single individuals have and will always be very unprofessional and pathetic. Hence why the dislike i have of him.
I have nothing against Epic nore EPicJim (i think he's a good guy in my book)
But Jim the monkey, well he's just a blatant banana monkey to me who although tries hard, will never be close to what P1mpdogg could do to real someone up.
His blatant attacks on single individuals have and will always be very unprofessional and pathetic. Hence why the dislike i have of him.
I agree the.Drama is one thing but hes becmoing a shitstain here now... and everyday he drops another wet fart in the gfy tighty whiteys
Comment