Is the position still open?

That was only three questions, do I win a prize?

:1orglaugh

There were 4 questions, you fail basic math.

Just an FYI since I am getting a lot of people hitting me up on ICQ.

I am sure you are very talented, and are perfectly qualified, but if we never chat, or haven't met, I am not going to refer you. I am sorry, but I only refer people I feel comfortable saying, "yeah, they can do the job."

Nothing personal, but that is the way it is. That is the way it has to be.

Then it sounds like you wouldnt see brains if they were deep fried and served on a mount olympus platter to you. Any recruiter seeing my indepth response to what went wrong in the shooting situation plus the uniqueness of my sig would say, hey theres something special about this guy, I'd like to know more. :2 cents:

Furthermore, most people who witnessed the lack of professionalism in that shooting and the waste of innocent life are NORMAL. I don't know what is so normal about rooting for the police, yes its sad the dog was shot but it could have been prevented. I guess all the peeps on that thread had screws loose except for me? Basically you'd like me/know me if I rooted for the cops firing 81 bullets into someone. Man, good thing I know YOU now.

thats got to be an alltime low, having an opinion formed about me over a fucking snuff film

Goodluck, its tough to find good ones

Bump for you and good luck in your search.

You may need to widen the fishing hole you're searching in. It seems as if GFY has been runing thin on verifiable talent lately...thus the repeat posts by one other that I can think of offhand.

Bump for baddog!

Dude, it comes down to the fact that I do not know you, and what I do know about you, I don't like.

How hard is that to comprehend?

. . . and the number of people that keep insisting that there are only 3 questions. That is almost scary.

On the bright side it at least narrows down the list for you. Amazing how many people can't even be bothered to read a thread. Especially when they are looking for a job.

haha yeh I noticed that too... Although putting one of them in the title was tricky. ;)

Oh hell I gave it away, now they'll all know where to find the first one.

However, to be fair... Could it be possible that by merely replying to the thread and answering the following three meant that, by default, the first was answered in the affirmative?

Who knows, maybe THAT was what is going on?

<me puts down the pipe and chuckles a bit...sure it is>

You dislike me because of a snuff film. YOU DISLIKE ME OVER A SNUFF FILM. Does anyone here with a right mind agree with this? I'd like to see a vote. What kind of a sick fuck judges someone over a snuff film? Jesus fuckin fuck. How hard is THAT to comprehend?

I used to run an affiliate program that had a test you had to pass in order to be accepted. The test was following my initial instructions. It made it so much easier.

If you can't comprehend basic English there is no way I was going to be able to train you to promote our product. I am sure a good 50% never made it past the first stage of the screening process.

No, I hate spiders. Does that make you feel better?

If that was the case, why would they make a point of saying there were only 3 questions?

Yes, replying could be interpreted as a reply to question 1, but it doesn't explain the "there are only 3 questions" commentary.

I'm likely 3 of those.

bump for baddog's search

I believe the first question was in the thread title.