GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The 1969 moon landing was faked! Here's proof... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=650742)

mikeyddddd 08-31-2006 11:41 PM

Fiddy fakes?

Pleasurepays 08-31-2006 11:41 PM

51 morons who would believe the moon was made of cheese if they read it on the interweb.

Ecchi22 08-31-2006 11:49 PM

We're banned from the Moon. I think we'll be kicked again in... 2020??? That would be pretty interesting year ;)

DTK 08-31-2006 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ecchi22
We're banned from the Moon.

Pimpdog pissed off the aliens...or was it AlienQ?

DTK 08-31-2006 11:59 PM

http://www.signapalooza.com/promo/astronaut4.jpg

Skunkie 09-01-2006 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
51 morons who would believe the moon was made of cheese if they read it on the interweb.

It's not made of cheese?

J.P. 09-01-2006 02:56 AM

You mean Mrs. Gorsky gave Mr. Gorsky a blowjob for nothing? :)

timberlands 09-01-2006 03:07 AM

monkies are too stupid to travel in space. leave that to the aliens

Bladewire 09-01-2006 03:09 AM

You haven't proven that man hasn't landed on the moon.

Prove that man hasn't landed on the moon or STFU

oh and there's the small question of the laser reflecter Armstrong left on the moon to keep time with the atomic clock... it reflects daily http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/21jul_llr.htm

fucking idiot :pimp

FetishTom 09-01-2006 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobby666
i started a poll some months ago about this topic here, as i remember the "it was a fake" won

Which proves either:

1) That the people voting for 'it was a fake' were taking the piss, or

2) The average IQ of your typical GFY conspiracy nut is on a par with a not very bright chimp

My money is on option 2

Skunkie 09-01-2006 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom
Which proves either:

2) The average IQ of your typical GFY conspiracy nut is on a par with a not very bright chimp

My money is on option 2

Ook! :banana

Dirty F 09-01-2006 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
well, let's see... if it was a hoax.. then there'd be a couple of people to make the set, a lighting guy... the astronauts themselves and the people who made the decision.

I know, a slight exaggeration but really... how many people does it take to pull off a 2 person short film?

Keeping mind that even most the CIA pulls off missions while on a "need to know" basis only.


No offense but thats the most idiotic thing i read on gfy all week.

topshelfdesign 09-01-2006 04:59 AM

im 50/50 unsure, but i guess the landing was real, i dunno

Dirty F 09-01-2006 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit
You haven't proven that man hasn't landed on the moon.

Prove that man hasn't landed on the moon or STFU

oh and there's the small question of the laser reflecter Armstrong left on the moon to keep time with the atomic clock... it reflects daily http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/21jul_llr.htm

fucking idiot :pimp


Seriously, they will ignore this. Someone mentioned it in another thread. Nobody will reply anymore. They just ignore till the next time a similar thread comes up and they will be screaming conspiracy again.

Dirty F 09-01-2006 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topshelfdesign
im 50/50 unsure, but i guess the landing was real, i dunno


Why are you in doubt? Whats the problem??

georgeyw 09-01-2006 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluewireBrian
Those rockets don't fall out of peoples asses you know.

After reading this entire thread, I began to form an opinion on the topic. Then I hit this line, laughed my ass off and forgot wtf I was thinking :thumbsup Thanks that was the funniest thing i've read all day!

Fabien 09-01-2006 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/Moonshad1.gif
This NASA picture should show the astronaut in complete shadow because the sun is behind him, and yet the whole of the astronaut is caught in bright light?


Don't know if it's all fake but one thing's for sure, some of the pics are fake. They were done in a studio.

Dirty F 09-01-2006 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fabien
Don't know if it's all fake but one thing's for sure, some of the pics are fake. They were done in a studio.


Oh yeah? Thats for sure? Got any proof? Or is it for sure because you read it on some conspiracy nut site?

Acne 09-01-2006 05:43 AM

leave it to StuartD to come up with his own pile of bullshit. anything to slam the US. we did it we made it to the moon. anyone that thinks otherwise is a total idiot.

http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Did%20...the%20Moon.htm

Dirty Dane 09-01-2006 05:44 AM

Its proven on this website:

http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moo...n_landings.htm

wyldblyss 09-01-2006 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
Yes, 6 of them... all between 69 and 72. I didn't say there wasn't several. Just that the technology was there at the time to just come and go as they pleased, but nothing since... and now.... we take 14 years to figure out how to do it?

For NASA, continuing to go to the moon is like going on a cruise around the world every year, but only getting off the cruise ship once, always at the same location.

People at NASA, those that look to the heavens, there is just so much more than just the moon. They have been there, done that, several times. They have their walks, their rocks, their experiments. They have explored several areas of it. It was time to move on. They could no longer justify the budget needed to continue to go to the moon over and over again. The general public was even questioning the need to constantly go to the moon.

As for the 14 years, it said it would take 14 years to get that particular craft to the moon. That means designing it, building it, testing it etc. They didn't say it would take 14 years to figure out how to put a man on the moon.

xcitecash 09-01-2006 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
I have listened to the tin foil hat conspiracy theories for many years and I never believed em... until I looked at this and really thought about it.



Now, I dunno about you guys but I smell something fishy. Here we are in the 21st century and it's going to take us around 14 years to put a man on the friggin moon? That should be childs play for us at this point. 2 years, sure... 14 years!?!?! Hell no.

I thought our biggest issue was getting men to Mars, not the moon.

Am I crazy for thinking this?

Apparantly the levels of radiation just halfway to the moon are something no human could stand in a suit or not.....

nothing to prove since we wont all be here by 2014 the way its headed

Dirty F 09-01-2006 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xcitecash
Apparantly the levels of radiation just halfway to the moon are something no human could stand in a suit or not.....

nothing to prove since we wont all be here by 2014 the way its headed

Did you even read the link posted above?

interracialtoons 09-01-2006 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
I'm calling bullshit on the 1969 efforts... back then. There were no computers, ...

I'm calling bullshit.

One word : UNIVAC

One link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIVAC_I


My father bougth a fucking personal computer from Radio Shack in 1977 for $600.00

http://www.maxmon.com/1973ad.htm

Quote:

Originally Posted by above_article
In the same mid-1973 time-frame, the Scelbi Computer Consulting Company presented the 8008-based Scelbi-8H microcomputer, which was the first microprocessor-based computer kit to hit the market

:1orglaugh

BaldBastard 09-01-2006 07:44 AM

It does not make sense that you land a craft on the moon that uses thrusters to slow its decent, which by all accounts should of blown any dust, lose rock etc well away from the landing site and the first guy that steps out makes a nice foot print in the sand, and hold up a flag that is waving in the no atmosphere breeze.

xcitecash 09-01-2006 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
Did you even read the link posted above?

Yep it was bollox

Big_Red 09-01-2006 07:53 AM

Sorry to burst your bubble folks. But the Russians made it there first.

Pleasurepays 09-01-2006 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xcitecash
Yep it was bollox

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dirty F 09-01-2006 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xcitecash
Yep it was bollox


You call these conspiracy theories evidence and that link above bollocks?

Oh man...

Swanks 09-01-2006 08:17 AM

I believe it was all bullshit as well. Nothing but a chance for the USA to show their superiority over Russia and prove to the world they are the greatest. We have done this since day one and we continue to do this. High power over paid officials will go great lengths to insure the US survives and stays on the "high horse". The US is *THE* land of coverups.

GeorgeM 09-01-2006 08:31 AM

it was faked...im sure

pornguy 09-01-2006 08:42 AM

Just grab some of the testing footage from the Lunar landers. They tested them in the desert areas that were made mostly of rock. They had trouble, because the rockets wold dig a hole as big or bigger than the lander.

Then look at the photos of the landing on the moon

Dirty F 09-01-2006 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeorgeM
it was faked...im sure


Oh really? How exactly are you sure? Please explain.

Dirty F 09-01-2006 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy
Just grab some of the testing footage from the Lunar landers. They tested them in the desert areas that were made mostly of rock. They had trouble, because the rockets wold dig a hole as big or bigger than the lander.

Then look at the photos of the landing on the moon

What are you trying to say?

Holly 09-01-2006 09:11 AM

I've always said that if this place ever started requiring a paid membership or some kind of charge to post, that I'd never do it. But I'm only kidding myself.

I'd pay.


And it would be worth it.

Pleasurepays 09-01-2006 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy
Just grab some of the testing footage from the Lunar landers. They tested them in the desert areas that were made mostly of rock. They had trouble, because the rockets wold dig a hole as big or bigger than the lander.

Then look at the photos of the landing on the moon

so what line of moronic reasoning led you to believe that the surface composition and surface properties of the moon are somehow exactly similar to the arizona or nevada desert?

PaulB IYP 09-01-2006 09:38 AM

tfhp reppin

Dollarmansteve 09-01-2006 09:46 AM

the saturn V was the coolest fake rocket ever.

E$_manager 09-01-2006 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobby666
i started a poll some months ago about this topic here, as i remember the "it was a fake" won

because thee are many people who do not trust the government.

Manowar 09-01-2006 09:56 AM

Mmmmh Conspiracies!!!

spazlabz 09-01-2006 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/Moonshad1.gif
This NASA picture should show the astronaut in complete shadow because the sun is behind him, and yet the whole of the astronaut is caught in bright light?

The surface of the moon reflected the light back at him. Just like it you shine a flashlight on a white piece of paper in a dark room it will light the area around it...
for the longest time I thought those pictures were suspicious too until I watched a show about it on discovery where they explained everything...


except the radiation shielding that would be necessary for a lunar landing hummmmmm


spaz

Got Porn? 09-01-2006 10:08 AM

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/im...waving_med.jpg

Pictures of Apollo astronauts erecting a US flag on the Moon show the flag bending and rippling. How can that be? After all, there's no breeze on the Moon....

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

E$_manager 09-01-2006 10:11 AM

and what about Russians? Were they on the moon? and if yes was it true?

Got Porn? 09-01-2006 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett
The Russians did almost beat us to the moon, however their main rocket that was to be used blew up on every un-manned launch test..

This is how close they came to beating us..

These were all done by the Russians..

First probe to impact the moon, Luna 2 (1959)
First images of the moon's far side, Luna 3 (1959)
First probe launched to Mars (1960)
First probe launched to Venus (1961)
First probe to hit another planet (Venus), Venera 3 (1965)
First probe to transmit from the surface of the moon, Luna 9 (1966)
First probe in lunar orbit, Luna 10 (1966)

So are you going to say if it was impossiabe for the US to do it then the Russians must have faked all their successes as well?

The Russian?s obviously were beating the U.S. with their space program. This give?s the motive for the conspiracy theory. If the U.S. beat the Russian?s to the moon what made them give up? After all they were the first to do everything else. Why did they quit?

spazlabz 09-01-2006 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Porn?
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/im...waving_med.jpg

Pictures of Apollo astronauts erecting a US flag on the Moon show the flag bending and rippling. How can that be? After all, there's no breeze on the Moon....

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

the flag hada rigid post across the top of the flag and as they were displaying the flag the vibrations from the pole cause the ripples to appear.


spaz

Dollarmansteve 09-01-2006 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz
the flag hada rigid post across the top of the flag and as they were displaying the flag the vibrations from the pole cause the ripples to appear.


spaz

the people who believe these theories have no interest in logic or rationale.

It is like telling an 8 year old there's no santa claus - they WANT to believe it.. and the fact that presents show up every christmas morning is all the proof they need.

Gerco 09-01-2006 11:00 AM

So, why doesn't someone take one of the thousands of telescopes on earth and simply find the landing area and take a picture of it? Make a game of it.. They left a LOT of stuff there, should be in about the same condition as when it was left. I have not played with the modern consumer telescopes but you would think that enen some of the larger ones of those could be used for this.

spazlabz 09-01-2006 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerco
So, why doesn't someone take one of the thousands of telescopes on earth and simply find the landing area and take a picture of it? Make a game of it.. They left a LOT of stuff there, should be in about the same condition as when it was left. I have not played with the modern consumer telescopes but you would think that enen some of the larger ones of those could be used for this.

the hell with it build your own! LOL
http://members.aol.com/sfsidewalk/cdobplans.htm

spaz

Gerco 09-01-2006 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerco
So, why doesn't someone take one of the thousands of telescopes on earth and simply find the landing area and take a picture of it? Make a game of it.. They left a LOT of stuff there, should be in about the same condition as when it was left. I have not played with the modern consumer telescopes but you would think that enen some of the larger ones of those could be used for this.

Crash landing on lunar surface
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...58-663,00.html

ok, my question answered here....


The RASC Calgary Centre
Can a telescope see the Lunar Landers or Lunar Rovers on the Moon?
http://calgary.rasc.ca/moonscope.htm

and a snipped from the same page...

"OK, so how do we know that the landers and rovers are there?

* The astronauts recorded thousands of still images and movies of the descent, the exploration, and their departure - a historical record of the events.
* The moon rocks brought back by the astronauts have been examined by scientists the world over and are unquestionably of lunar origin.
* The ALSEP science packages put on the surface by the astronauts radioed back significant amounts of data.
* The seismometers recorded "moonquakes", and when the astronauts returned to the Command Module they jettisoned the landers and crashed them into the moon and the seismometers recorded these events as well as the crashes of the Saturn IV B stages.
* The Apollo 11, 14 and 15 missions left behind "corner reflectors" which astronomers (e.g. McDonald Observatory, Texas) can use to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon precisely, even today. This has been upgraded recently to the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation. We now know the range from the Moon to Texas within one millimetre. "

Dirty F 09-01-2006 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Porn?
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/im...waving_med.jpg

Pictures of Apollo astronauts erecting a US flag on the Moon show the flag bending and rippling. How can that be? After all, there's no breeze on the Moon....

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm


This shit is explained over and over again and the answer can be found on Google within 5 secs. If this is reason enough for you to believe in a conspiracy then you're a bit simple.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123