Why don't you post your address so I can come over and put my foot up your ass and my fist down your throat.

Hmmmm... better yet...whay don't I hack your password and post under your name.

Go ahead and challege me to do it....BITCH!

Wasn't using that to talk shit but if you want to be a crybaby keyboard warrior so be it.

"I DARE YOU TO CHALLENGE ME". Please, crack my gfy password, violate a law. You're probably the same stupid kiddy that runs around throwing out words such as "Heap Overflow" and "NOP Slides". I WILL HAX YUR INTERWEB

wats ur asn nubr

roflmao ...

I know I'm beating a dead horse, here... but is this like the first time you've seen crypt(), I mean, ever? DES is only significant to EIGHT bytes, and that's all that is guaranteed. Period.

Not to mention your proposed salt is either static, or the password itself. It doesn't work that way. Ya might want to look into ROT13. Now that will take any sized string, man.. and DAMN is it fast!

He's to busy cracking our passwords with retardo scripts from packetstormsecurity.nl to reply, so yes, beating a dead horse :thumbsup

What I'd really like to know is why you bother with

when

gets you the same thing. Then you needlessly copy the array to @two & @three... why?

would accomplish the same thing as

I just fool around with perl in my free time and even I can see you're a total novice.

Because I wanted a stupid MoFo like you to understand it.

I wasn't trying to write "secret code" to baffle webmasters who don't even write scripts. How would that illustrate anything to them?

BTW: It's really fucking lame to take a solution that you could never have done yourself and then spend 24 hours since it was posted trying to pick at it.
why didn't you post a solution yesterday and end this thread?... Because you couldn't.

Stop acting like a jealous fagot. It will not make you a better webmaster.

Now I'm done. Gotta go do something more productive than listening to stupid shit.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh