GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   do you think an Asteroid will hit Earth in the 21st century ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=648605)

polish_aristocrat 08-28-2006 12:58 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_event

Rhesus 08-29-2006 12:55 PM

Interesting thread

polish_aristocrat 08-30-2006 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhesus
Interesting thread

:) :) :) :)

JayDeeZee 08-30-2006 05:54 AM

We'll find a way to shoot it first!

MaddCaz 08-30-2006 05:56 AM

21st? Entirely poossible.

notabook 08-30-2006 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayDeeZee
We'll find a way to shoot it first!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Yeah.. with our mighty LASERS :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

polish_aristocrat 09-07-2006 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris
Asteroid will not hit us beause we going to blow it in orbit.

thanks for your opinion, Sir

polish_aristocrat 10-07-2006 06:35 AM

http://www.firstscience.com/site/ima...2/asteroid.jpg

cleanpussynow 10-07-2006 07:35 AM

I think that we are going to burn in hell,not asteroid,but human fulishnes.

cess 10-07-2006 07:37 AM

I seriously doubt that would happen.

Big_Red 10-07-2006 07:38 AM

50 the skies are falling.

MaddCaz 10-07-2006 07:38 AM

wouldnt surprise me

More Booze 10-07-2006 07:51 AM

asteroid-traffic convert at 1:300

pigman 10-30-2006 03:39 PM

Ofcourse, we get hit all the time. But just small ones ;D

Mr Pheer 10-30-2006 03:41 PM

I hope one hits this evening.

Mediachick 10-30-2006 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoCarrier (Post 10709719)

LMAO--good one!

After Shock Media 10-30-2006 03:57 PM

Even with the current predictions we are still in the ahhh shit phase. Nasa has less than twenty people trying to find all the potential impact rocks in space. Only a very small few have been found and checked for orbit and the like.
Even those can not be certain due to outside collisions in the asteroid belt that very well could push stable rocks out of their current orbit.

Then as we have learned with the meteor in Tunguska, that was an air burst and not an actual impact. Even bigger air bursts sites are being found and looked into a lot now. Example is the one that went off over the Sahara in Egypt that created the desert glass, and other locations in China and places where we have glass and or shocked quartz. Impact is not always needed to be extremely damaging no mater what is below it.

As for the silly replies about shooting it down, blowing it up, whatever. It just does not work that way. Stupid gravity and all just would reassemble the large rock into a huge pile of smaller rocks to pelt us with. Rubble piles are just as bad, and even worse if we do nuke them or something since they would now also be radioactive. Our only real chance if we find one is to find a way to push it some to change its course.

8 Characters 10-30-2006 04:02 PM

Asteroids hit the earth every day.

8 Characters 10-30-2006 04:04 PM

Oh, and don't worry about NASA, they are useless. There's a hundred thousand people around the world looking at the sky almost round the clock. At least we'll KNOW if we're about to become extinct.

jimthefiend 10-30-2006 04:22 PM

There is a mass extinction about every 30 million years. We're LONG overdue.


The theory is that every 30 million years the solar system passes through a VERY dense cloud of asteroids and such. We are RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE of that cloud right now.

Kapitan Ivanov II 10-30-2006 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend (Post 11193848)
There is a mass extinction about every 30 million years. We're LONG overdue.


The theory is that every 30 million years the solar system passes through a VERY dense cloud of asteroids and such. We are RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE of that cloud right now.

Plus, the fairy godmother is out on business and cannot watch our boiling kettles for us.

Barefootsies 10-30-2006 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jact (Post 10709216)
It's entirely possible that it can happen at any given moment. We had a very near miss a couple of years ago that we didn't even notice until it would have been far too late. We're only tracking what, 1% of the sky? And even if we do see it, we can't do fuck all about it.

Um.. you want, and believe a little too much of that Armageddon movie there chief. The space agencies track everything for years to come. So we would know long in advance.

You might want to do a bit more research, and a little less movie watching.

:winkwink:

polish_aristocrat 10-31-2006 06:06 AM

nice bump, although no idea why :)

Barefootsies 10-31-2006 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 11197981)
nice bump, although no idea why :)

Maybe they just watched the movie, and wanted to use the quote?
:winkwink:

CaptainWolfy 10-31-2006 09:22 AM

i think it will :)

bobby666 10-31-2006 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by More Booze (Post 11017521)
asteroid-traffic convert at 1:300

which affiliate programm ?

jimthefiend 10-31-2006 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 11194731)
The space agencies track everything for years to come.

Thats not exactly accurate.

polish_aristocrat 11-29-2006 07:08 AM

Quote:

MIAMI.- The U.S. space agency Nasa evokes Hollywood in effort to avoid catastrophe in a mission that would bridge gap between moon and Mars

It?s the stuff of nightmares and, until now, Hollywood thrillers. A huge asteroid is on a catastrophic collision course with Earth and mankind is poised to go the way of the dinosaurs.

So to save the day, Nasa now plans to go where only Bruce Willis has gone before. The US space agency is drawing up plans to land an astronaut on an asteroid hurtling through space at more than 30,000 mph. It wants to know whether humans could master techniques needed to deflect such a doomsday object when it is eventually identified.

Though the proposals are at an early stage, and a spacecraft needed just to send an astronaut that far into space exists only on the drawing board, they are deadly serious. A smallish asteroid called Apophis has already been identified as a possible threat to Earth in 2036.

Nasa?s Chris McKay, of the Johnson Space Centre in Houston told the website Space.com: ``There's a lot of public resonance with the notion that Nasa ought to be doing something about killer asteroids ... to be able to send serious equipment to an asteroid.?
http://www.dominicantoday.com/app/article.aspx?id=19846

polish_aristocrat 12-29-2006 01:44 PM

Different end of human civilization scenarios from Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_of_civilization


Quote:

It is certain that events in space will cause life on Earth to come to an end. The certain events, however, will happen at an extremely long timescale measured in billions of years. Projections indicate that the Andromeda Galaxy is on a collision course with the Milky Way. Impact is predicted in about 3 billion years, and so Andromeda will approach at an average speed of about 140 kilometres (87 miles) per second; the two galaxies will probably merge to form a giant elliptical. This merging could eject the solar system in a more eccentric orbit[citation needed] and an unwanted position in the merged galaxy causing our planet to become uninhabitable (an actual collision is unnecessary)[citation needed]. In about 5 billion years, stellar evolution predicts our sun will exhaust its core hydrogen and become a red giant. In so doing, it will become thousands of times more luminous.[3] Even in its current phase of stellar evolution, the sun is increasing in luminosity (at a very slow rate). Many scientists predict that in fewer than one billion years, the runaway greenhouse effect will make Earth unsuitable for life.

On an even longer time scale, the universe may come to an end. The current age of the universe is estimated as being 13.8 billion years old in 2007. There are several competing theories as to the nature of our universe and how it will end, but in all cases, there will be no life possible. These scenarios take place on a considerably longer timescale than the expanding of the sun.


[edit] Meteorite impact
In the history of the Earth, it is widely accepted that several large meteorites have hit Earth. The Cretaceous-Tertiary asteroid, for example, is theorized to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. If such an object struck the Earth it could have a serious impact on civilization. It's even possible that humanity would be completely destroyed: for this, the asteroid would need to be at least 1 km (0.6 miles) in diameter, but probably between 3?10 km (2?6 miles).[4] Asteroids with a 1 km diameter impact the Earth every 0.5 million years[4] on average. Larger asteroids are more rare. The last large (>10 km) impact happened 65 million years ago. So-called Near-Earth asteroids are regularly being observed.

Some scientists believe there are patterns in the number of meteorites hitting Earth. An interesting explanation of such a pattern is given by the hypothetical star Nemesis. This hypothesis states that a star named Nemesis regularly passes through a denser part of the Oort cloud, causing meteorite rains to collide onto Earth. However, the very existence of this pattern is not widely accepted, and the existence of the Nemesis star is highly controversial.

A star passage that will cause an increase of meteorites is the arrival of a star called Gliese 710. This star is probably moving on a collision course with the Solar System and will likely be at a distance 1.1 light years from the Sun in 1.4 million years. Some models predict that this will send large amounts of comets from the Oort cloud to the Earth.[5] Other models, such as the one by García-Sánchez, predict an increase of only 5%.


[edit] Less likely cosmic threats
A number of other scenarios have been suggested. A Black Hole could enter the solar system.[6] If this happened, the result would be catastrophic. Another threat might come from Gamma ray bursts; some scientists believe this may have caused mass extinction 450 million years ago.[7] Both are very unlikely.[2] Still others see Extraterrestrial life as a possible threat to mankind;[8] although alien life has never been found, scientists such as Carl Sagan have postulated that the existence of extraterrestrial life is very likely. Even NASA sterilizes items returning from space to kill any potential extraterrestrial life forms that might threaten humanity, like viruses. Scientists consider such a scenario technically possible, but unlikely.[9]


[edit] Earth
In the history of the Earth, many ice ages have occurred. More ice ages will almost certainly come at an interval of 40,000?100,000 years. This would have a serious impact on civilization as we know it today, because vast areas of land (mainly in North-America and Europe) could become uninhabitable. It would still be possible to live in the tropical regions, but with possible loss of humidity/water.

A less predictable scenario is a global pandemic. For example, if HIV mutates and becomes as transmissible as the common cold, the consequences would be disastrous, but probably not fatal to the human species,[10] as some people are immune to HIV.[11] This particular scenario would also contradict the observable tendency for pathogens to become less fatal over time as a natural function of biological pressure.

Another possibility is the megatsunami. A megatsunami could, for example, destroy the entire east coast of the United States of America (see La Palma). The coastal areas of the entire world could be flooded in case of the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.[12] While none of these scenarios could possibly destroy humanity completely, they could regionally threaten civilization as we know it.

When the supervolcano at Yellowstone last erupted, 600,000 years ago, the magma and ash covered roughly all of the area of North America west of the Mississippi river. Another such eruption could threaten civilization. Such an eruption could also release large amounts of gases that could alter the balance of the planet's carbon dioxide and cause a runaway greenhouse effect, or enough pyroclastic debris and other material may be thrown into the atmosphere to partially block out the sun and cause a natural nuclear winter, similar to 1816, the Year Without A Summer.


[edit] Humanity
Probably the biggest threat for humanity comes from humanity itself.[13] The scenario that has been explored most is a nuclear war or another weapon with similar possibilities. It is difficult to predict whether it would exterminate humanity, but very certainly could alter civilization as we know it, in particular if there was a nuclear winter event.[14]

Another category of disasters are unforeseen consequences of technology. It has been suggested that learning computers take unforeseen actions or that robots would out-compete humanity.[15] Biotechnology could lead to the creation of a pandemic, Nanotechnology could lead to grey goo - in both cases, either deliberately or by accident.[16] It has also been suggested that physical scientists might accidentally create a device that could destroy the earth and the solar system.[17] In string theory, there are some unknown variables. If those turn out to have an unfortunate value, the universe may not be stable and alter completely, destroying everything in it,[18] either at random or by an accidental experiment. This is called Quantum Vacuum Collapse by some.[19] Another kind of accident is the Ice-9 Type Transition, in which our planet including everything on it becomes a strange matter planet in a chain reaction. Some do not view this as a credible scenario.[20]

It has been suggested that runaway global warming might cause the climate on Earth to become like Venus, which would make it uninhabitable. In less extreme scenarios it could cause the end of civilization as we know it.[21]

Other scenarios that have been named are:

Antibiotic resistance. Natural selection would create super bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics, devastating the world population and causing a global collapse of civilization.[citation needed]
Demography. Demographic trends create a "baby bust" that threatens the order of civilization as we know it.[22]
Mutual assured destruction A full scale Nuclear war could kill billions, and the resulting Nuclear fallout effectively crush any form of civilization.
Dysgenics. A lack of natural selection and the tendency of the more intelligent to have fewer children would lower the average health and intelligence enough to lead to an eventual collapse of civilization, associated with controversial eugenics theories.[23]
Ecology. Natural resources are used up, or the environment is so damaged through pollution and destruction that civilization fails.[citation needed]
Finance. Markets fail worldwide, resulting in economic collapse: mass unemployment, rioting, famine, and death.[citation needed]
Infertility. Human fertility continues to decline, eventually ending with no fertile humans left to continue the species.[citation needed]
Gray Goo. Out-of-control self-replicating robots consume all living matter on Earth while building more of themselves.[citation needed]
Overpopulation. World population may increase to such an extent in the future that it would lead to lack of space for habitation.[citation needed]
Peak oil. Oil runs out before an economically viable replacement is devised, leading to global chaos.[24]
Quantum energy. In the search for new quantum particles, scientists accidentally destroy the universe. This, however, is highly unlikely; a Chernobyl style disaster is much more possible.[citation needed]
Telomere. Some researchers theorize a tiny loss of telomere length from one generation to the next, mirroring the process of aging in individuals. Over thousands of generations the telomere erodes down to its critical level. Once at the critical level we would expect to see outbreaks of age-related diseases occurring earlier in life and finally a population crash.

StuartD 12-29-2006 02:10 PM

damn, spooky... I had just done a search for this thread 30 mins ago to re-watch the videos of the asteroids.

carol.prime 12-29-2006 02:14 PM

probably no...but the chance of killing yourself with taking some drugs are high...LOL :thumbsup :thumbsup

tony286 12-29-2006 02:30 PM

I hope it doesnt happen in our lifetime, its very scary and the government only gives about 8 mil in fund for it .

Dragar 12-29-2006 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 10708642)
anyone here interested a little in this subject?

from what I know, the chances for a big collision are minimal because they happen once every few millions years, but f.e chances for an impact similar in scale to the Tunguska Event aren't that small.....

I'll be dead by then so no biggy to me :pimp

baddog 12-29-2006 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyddddd (Post 10709614)
Indubitably

That used to ba a catch phrase with me and friends back in 1966-1967

geeksta 12-29-2006 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 10710101)

Even then? repopulating the planet with such a small genetic pool seems very unlikely. You may be able to sustain a small pool of humans for x number of years, but eventually (and probably sooner than later) the remainder of the human population will dwindle and dwindle until there simply just isn?t enough genetic variance to sustain a healthy population. More and more kids will start being born with more and more genetic abnormalities until the species eventually inbreeds itself into extinction. And that is story of how Moses saved Egypt from the robots.

You're assuming that the reproductive process that would take place after such and event with a smaller group of humans would be as it is now, natural. With the genetic technology we have available now we could create very genetically diverse embryos for womb implantation, and the interbreeding problem would be solved. In such a scenerio, "eugenics" would no longer be a dirty word, as survival of the human species would depend on it.

Dagwolf 12-29-2006 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by More Booze (Post 11017521)
asteroid-traffic convert at 1:300

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

E$_manager 12-29-2006 05:52 PM

I don't think so.

shekinah 12-29-2006 06:28 PM

If that would happen, we're all doomed:)

Dagwolf 12-29-2006 06:30 PM

It's an interesting question.. but pointless unless you're prepared to do something about it.

notabook 12-29-2006 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeksta (Post 11615841)
You're assuming that the reproductive process that would take place after such and event with a smaller group of humans would be as it is now, natural. With the genetic technology we have available now we could create very genetically diverse embryos for womb implantation, and the interbreeding problem would be solved. In such a scenerio, "eugenics" would no longer be a dirty word, as survival of the human species would depend on it.

We do not have such advanced genetic technology at our disposal at this present date and time. We could, practically, collect massive amounts of egg and sperm samples from various ethnic groups and locals throughout the world and keep them in a sort of huge databank to do kinda what you suggest though we would still be extremely limited in what we could do with them? we do not have ?artificial wombs? yet, and as such we are limited directly to the amount of females left on the planet/bunker/wherever they are hiding out in. Also since artificial insemination only has around a 7-29% success rate a lot of those genetic samples are going to go to waste.

Humanity is fucked at the moment. We have done essentially no preparing for a cataclysmic event, celestial or otherwise. If it were to happen soon our species would go the way of the hard working straight white male -- extinct.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123