Why isn's there Combined NATS checks?

BV · 08-23-2006, 04:11 PM

I'd love to see a cheaper version for use with ccbill (3rd party payouts) and able to merge with existing ccbill accts.

There is a huge market there waiting to be tapped.

**Jace** · 08-23-2006, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by BV

I'd love to see a cheaper version for use with ccbill (3rd party payouts) and able to merge with existing ccbill accts.

There is a huge market there waiting to be tapped.

if I am not mistaken, I think epoch and mpa3 might be doing something similar to this soon

**uno** · 08-23-2006, 04:41 PM

I've been asking em to do this since the inception of NATS.

**wtfent** · 08-23-2006, 04:52 PM

Sounds like a lot of work since Nats never even touches any of my money. How would Nats do this?

**Jace** · 08-23-2006, 04:53 PM

Originally posted by wtfent

Sounds like a lot of work since Nats never even touches any of my money. How would Nats do this?

they would strike a deal with on the processor level, and have nats installed the processors backend, where it would all be run from there

so, if you wanted to sign up for a ccbill program, you would get a nats like interface, and a full nats backend for each ccbill program you were signed up under

**jeffrey** · 08-23-2006, 05:42 PM

Originally posted by wtfent

Sounds like a lot of work since Nats never even touches any of my money. How would Nats do this?

Ya I know this, would just make it too easy if I could get a single payout though.

**Jace** · 08-23-2006, 05:46 PM

NATS could even try and start something like this within themselves and throughb an independant check cutting service

people can check the option to be part of the "NATS Payout Network", and when they check that they have to make sure they login to the central Nats control center and enter in all their programs, so that when check time comes, the program reports to the central nats network, then the central nats network reports to the checvk cutting service....all that is left is for the program to cut nats a check for the money they paid out to the affiliates

it would be pretty simple, but at the same time risky for NATS, because they could have programs that cut and run and don't pay them the affiliate money that is due...but they coul;d also tell the program that affiliate money must be in on a certain date, then 3 days later funds can be verified and sent to the affiliates

**baddog** · 08-23-2006, 05:48 PM

NATS isn't a processor

**Doctor Dre** · 08-23-2006, 05:49 PM

Originally posted by Jace

if I am not mistaken, I think epoch and mpa3 might be doing something similar to this soon

I can confirm that epoch's stats will be provided by mansion... kinda a MPA3 lite. As far as the merging checks we'll have to see ;)

They announced it unofficially at internext, without too many people noticing.

**Doctor Dre** · 08-23-2006, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by Jace

NATS could even try and start something like this within themselves and throughb an independant check cutting service

people can check the option to be part of the "NATS Payout Network", and when they check that they have to make sure they login to the central Nats control center and enter in all their programs, so that when check time comes, the program reports to the central nats network, then the central nats network reports to the checvk cutting service....all that is left is for the program to cut nats a check for the money they paid out to the affiliates

it would be pretty simple, but at the same time risky for NATS, because they could have programs that cut and run and don't pay them the affiliate money that is due...but they coul;d also tell the program that affiliate money must be in on a certain date, then 3 days later funds can be verified and sent to the affiliates

Yea nats could make a lot of money cutting checks ... definitly. And if they did merged and charged each aff progrma, they would make even more.

**Jace** · 08-23-2006, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by Doctor Dre

I can confirm that epoch's stats will be provided by mansion... kinda a MPA3 lite. As far as the merging checks we'll have to see ;)

They announced it unofficially at internext, without too many people noticing.

yeah, i read that....fucking great idea ;)

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=616031

**Jace** · 08-23-2006, 05:52 PM

Originally posted by Doctor Dre

Yea nats could make a lot of money cutting checks ... definitly. And if they did merged and charged each aff progrma, they would make even more.

fuck yeah man, they could charge programs a fee for using the service and charge affiliates for using it also

**Mutt** · 08-23-2006, 06:05 PM

i've been meaning to ask John about this - i've seen a few posts by him and nathan that sound like they are trying to come up with something that will allow programs using NATS to integrate with CCBILL where payouts come from CCBILL while the program still uses NATS. There are definitely a ton of people who really do prefer using CCBILL's stuff - one is just the trust factor, you have alot of pretty small operators using NATS, and the other one is the minimum payout issue - lots of affiliates promote a whack of sites and send one signup a week to a site - most programs are set to delay payment by a pay period, bottom line is it can take a couple months to reach the minimum and get a check when you're a small guy.

IF I was a programmer I'd create a product just for CCBILL - much of it would just be a replication of what is in CCBILL's admin but there are features that could be added such as campaign tracking, gallery builder, shopping cart etc

**Tempest** · 08-23-2006, 06:23 PM

Originally posted by BV

I'd love to see a cheaper version for use with ccbill (3rd party payouts) and able to merge with existing ccbill accts.

There is a huge market there waiting to be tapped.

They're working on this... it won't be cheaper though.. course.. they might change their mind on that one.

Why isn's there Combined NATS checks?

Why isn's there Combined NATS checks?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment