![]() |
50 unpaid affiiates
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
most don't post on boards though |
Quote:
|
hm..nothing from the xclusive camp as to why they aren't paying affiliates?
I have a good friend that is out a LOT of money because of this. |
One thing I´m curious about is: are you as a program owner so totally dependent of the NATS crew?
I´m betatesting my paysite now using CCBill so far. If it will go public in the future NATS is an option for sure. But I´m not such as big as reality cash for example and so I´m asking myself if it is a smart move to get dependent of another company, be it NATS or someone else. If I get it right NATS can cancel or suspend your account which means there is no access to the account for the program owner any longer? |
Quote:
My question is why would TMM at leats not send them a printout or a report or something so that they CAN pay affiliates... doesn't entail giving them access, but it doesn't seem fair to me for the affiliates to get punished for something that the program allegedly did. |
Quote:
it is all basically in the hands of NR at this point, and they don't seem to care about paying their affiliates |
hm...still nothing out of all this?
|
still nothing?
|
bump so we don't forget that a scamming company is still operating and stealing rebills from honest webmasters
|
Quote:
I see so many webmasters say "NATS rules" and they are right, it does rule, in more ways than one. It can destroy a program and they really don't have to prove anything, all they have to do is suspend the licence. You piss them off, they can suspend you,...their program has a bug, results are scewed, they blame you, it isn't your fault, they ruin your company, Now I am not saying NATS would ever do this, what I am saying, that any company that has the power to basically shut down 1/3 or 1/4 of all sponsor programs has more power than I personally, as a webmaster am comfortable with. Those webmasters who use "NATS only" programs have never stopped to think, what if for some reason NATS ceased to exist...they are fuxored! |
Quote:
fact is, using any leased software has it's issues what about CC processors like ccbill / epoch....they have access to enormous amounts of data on a minute by minute basis and could cripple a business at any moment what makes TMM different than any other company you lease priority backend software from? |
Quote:
Do you really think it would be in our best interests to as you said, "their program has a bug, results are scewed, they blame you, it isn't your fault, they ruin your company,"? Regarding "what if for some reason NATS ceased to exist"; as most of our clients know our source code as well as a client list is in escrow and updated monthly with our attorneys. Should we ever go out of business the source code would be distributed to our clients. I know its fun to "bash the big guy" but please, if you do it, have some facts to back yourself up. Or at least learn a little bit about the company and the people behind it before you try to scare people from using us. |
so we have no idea what is going on here ??? Thats alot of rebills to just keep ...
|
Quote:
|
Ahhh that sounds great .. At least someone is having fun with other peoples money ...
|
so, have any affiliates gotten paid?
|
Quote:
|
hmmmmmm, anyone remember this?
|
it will get real interesting..............
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123