First Charges Under Child Registry Act

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xxxjay
    Tube groupie.
    • Aug 2002
    • 13482

    #1

    First Charges Under Child Registry Act

    MICHIGAN -- Attorney General Mike Cox has filed criminal charges against California-based RR Media and a Florida company, Data Stream Group Inc., for sending e-mails promoting gambling and alcohol to addresses registered under Michigan's Child Protection Registry Act. Cox said the charges are the first of their kind in the country and may subject the e-mailers to a fine of up to $10,000 and other penalties. In addition to the criminal cases, Cox filed civil actions against the two companies in Ingham County Circuit Court. These companion cases to the criminal actions seek injunctions against further violations and other statutory penalties.
    Utah has a similar Child Protection Registry law. FSC filed suit in November, 2005, in federal district court in Salt Lake City, challenging the constitutionality and legality of that state?s anti-spam ?child protection registry? law, which went into effect July 15, 2005. See the FSC Website for a summary of that challenge and updates on the current status of the litigation. First Amendment attorney Brad Shafer is local council in Michigan as part of the FSC legal team overseeing the Child Protection Registry Act challenge.
    Information is from Melissa Campanelli, Direct Marketing News, 8/18/06
    http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
  • L-Pink
    working on my tan
    • Mar 2005
    • 39151

    #2
    oops, People forget that the number of "charges" and their affect in prosecuting can be staggering when emails are involved.


    (example, "defendant is charged with 62,000 counts of armed robbery")

    Comment

    • scottybuzz
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • May 2006
      • 14799

      #3
      heres a bump
      $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

      Comment

      • pr0
        rockin tha trailerpark
        • May 2001
        • 23088

        #4
        A "child" shouldn't have their own e-mail address in the first place. Unless its on a private network, within a school system.
        __________
        Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

        Comment

        • Spudstr
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2003
          • 2321

          #5
          simple, don't mail adult.
          Managed Hosting - Colocation - Network Services
          Yellow Fiber Networks
          icq: 19876563

          Comment

          • Scootermuze
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2001
            • 4513

            #6
            Originally posted by pr0
            A "child" shouldn't have their own e-mail address in the first place. Unless its on a private network, within a school system.
            With the way all of these ridiculous laws are being whipped out lately, the children will be running the country before long...

            Then again, they'd probably do a better job than is being done now..

            Comment

            • pr0
              rockin tha trailerpark
              • May 2001
              • 23088

              #7
              Originally posted by Spudstr
              simple, don't mail adult.
              thats right, leave e-mail marketing to time warner, metlife etc.

              which was the entire basis of the can-spam act

              this isn't an attack on adult, its an attack on freelance e-mail marketers
              __________
              Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

              Comment

              Working...