Al-Jazeera interview - Islam - the actuall truth

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • Sexxxy Sites
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2005
    • 851
    #31
    Originally posted by Sexxxy Sites
    Bottom line here folks is, it does not fit Webby's agenda. His agenda is anti the President, anti America, and anti Americans. Just do a search on his babblings.
    BTW folks he is a broke ass person that lives in a third world country and is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, liar on this board.

      Comment

      • Webby
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 14956
        #32
        Originally posted by Libertine
        She conveniently forgot about the whole issue of zionist terrorism, though.
        Sure... and without getting into some political bullshit sada for one side or the other, - the US budget for propaganda in the Middle East has increased substatially and is now having an impact on Pakistan and India.

        And.. without being cynical - who the fuck is this woman who may or may not be on the payroll? She may well be expressing her own views - and with good foundation, - but who the hell knows what's behind it?
        XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

          Comment

          • Webby
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 14956
            #33
            Originally posted by Sexxxy Sites
            BTW folks he is a broke ass person that lives in a third world country and is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, liar on this board.
            Stupid sicko lying old man who has little to offer than be a chatboard stalker.
            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

              Comment

              • elron
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 1553
                #34
                Originally posted by Webby
                ??? The orginal Al-Jazeera material showing an actual discussion was edited out to show a solo performance of one view.
                That's right , we all wanted to see her own view , the oppositve which you call "views" would be to insult her , and defend the islam , that's not what we wanted to hear .
                I still dont see why would this be considered as "$50 defective edit suite" .

                Admit that her words are very sour to you , and by telling is that it was "edited" you turn the subject to a whole different matter - the propaganda of memri , so we wont discuss about islam , but on memri .

                Isn't that what you wanted ?

                  Comment

                  • Mr. Blue
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 536
                    #35
                    Originally posted by Webby
                    Bottom line - very badly edited material with an agenda - basic propaganda.
                    Editing out the counterpoint isn't making it propoganda piece its only turned this into an editorial of her beliefs. Inserting the counterpoint doesn't change her beliefs and her beliefs are interesting. I don't see too many arabic women being able to express their opinions openly like that and even if it is edited into an editorial, it doesn't change the substance of what she said.

                    So, I'm not really sure why you're getting your shorts in a bunch over it...I'll see if I can find the full interview and post a link, but it won't change the editorial nature of what she said.
                    See Sig...oh wait.

                      Comment

                      • Lazonby
                        Confirmed User
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 2262
                        #36
                        Originally posted by Webby
                        If this was in fact a straight "story", - there is no need to cut out all other content. The final version looks like it was edited on a $50 edit suite with obvious chunks pulled out.

                        I spent four years in a basement cinema watching stuff like this (propaganda) - some if can be good, others, not so good - and this is definately in the "not so good category". If that was ever in doubt - just look at the source and reasoning behind even bothering to purchase the material from Al-Jazeera and then go and hack it.
                        This edited video is a fair representation of the entire thing.

                          Comment

                          • Webby
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14956
                            #37
                            Originally posted by elron
                            That's right , we all wanted to see her own view , the oppositve which you call "views" would be to insult her , and defend the islam , that's not what we wanted to hear .
                            I still dont see why would this be considered as "$50 defective edit suite" .

                            Admit that her words are very sour to you , and by telling is that it was "edited" you turn the subject to a whole different matter - the propaganda of memri , so we wont discuss about islam , but on memri .

                            Isn't that what you wanted ?
                            "You" may want to hear her - fine. That does not make it a rational or balance view in any way. "We" may want to hear other than just one side - that is what fair and balanced editoring reporting is all about.

                            I really don't have any opinions to offer either for or against - when the material is hacked - it's hard to see any balanced view. My opinions don't matter a shit either way - I was simply pointing out the edited source of this material and that it has no credibility.

                            It has everything to do with the source - eg MEMRI - what do you expect from a Washington based lobby group with aims to place a good light on US policy in the Middle East? There is nada more need be said on that - it's clear as day - the source has no cred.

                            Sure.. if you want to watch one-sided unbalanced reporting of a TV program from the Middle East - it's a free world
                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                              Comment

                              • Sexxxy Sites
                                Confirmed User
                                • Oct 2005
                                • 851
                                #38
                                Originally posted by Webby
                                "You" may want to hear her - fine. That does not make it a rational or balance view in any way. "We" may want to hear other than just one side - that is what fair and balanced editoring reporting is all about.

                                I really don't have any opinions to offer either for or against - when the material is hacked - it's hard to see any balanced view. My opinions don't matter a shit either way - I was simply pointing out the edited source of this material and that it has no credibility.

                                It has everything to do with the source - eg MEMRI - what do you expect from a Washington based lobby group with aims to place a good light on US policy in the Middle East? There is nada more need be said on that - it's clear as day - the source has no cred.

                                Sure.. if you want to watch one-sided unbalanced reporting of a TV program from the Middle East - it's a free world
                                "It has everything to do with the source - eg MEMRI - what do you expect from a Washington based lobby group with aims to place a good light on US policy in the Middle East? "

                                Folks as I stated before it does not fit into Webby's anti America agenda and that is why it has his panties in a bunch.

                                  Comment

                                  • Webby
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Oct 2002
                                    • 14956
                                    #39
                                    Originally posted by Sexxxy Sites
                                    "It has everything to do with the source - eg MEMRI - what do you expect from a Washington based lobby group with aims to place a good light on US policy in the Middle East? "

                                    Folks as I stated before it does not fit into Webby's anti America agenda and that is why it has his panties in a bunch.
                                    I'd expect that to press the old sicko's buttons and get him stalking again - so predictable

                                    Go away and grow up before posting again.
                                    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                      Comment

                                      • elron
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2003
                                        • 1553
                                        #40
                                        Originally posted by Webby
                                        "We" may want to hear other than just one side - that is what fair and balanced editoring reporting is all about.
                                        actually we do see that muslim preecher who calls her stupid and insults her as much as he can . Is that what you call "opposite view" ?

                                          Comment

                                          • Webby
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Oct 2002
                                            • 14956
                                            #41
                                            Originally posted by elron
                                            actually we do see that muslim preecher who calls her stupid and insults her as much as he can . Is that what you call "opposite view" ?
                                            I have no interest whatsoever in participating in a boring old GFY "discussion" about "sides".

                                            Whatever is said is better said in that a fair and balanced view is presented. If someone resorts to insults and bullshit - that reflects back on them.

                                            To be honest, my only interest in this is in the quality of the media and balance (it's something from an early past training) - it's not about Lebanon or Israel, - only about fair and balanced footage.

                                            That aside - sure, on a casual basis she sure has an interesting mouth - tho not unique, and makes good TV.
                                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                              Comment

                                              • Mr. Blue
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Jan 2005
                                                • 536
                                                #42
                                                http://aqoul.com/images/wafa_sultan.pdf

                                                There's the transcript, I couldn't find the video so if anyone wants to do a little reading go ahead I personally liked this exchange at the end of the conversation between the host and Ibrahim al-Khouly

                                                FQ: Who is civilized and who is not civilized, in brief?

                                                IK: The civilized party is the one that commits itself to human values and develops within that context...

                                                FQ: And in the West they are not committed to them?

                                                IK: There is no...What civilized man [allows] homosexuality, homosexual marriage, loss of bloodline? Most of those who rule the West are bastards and illegitimate children, does she want that fate for us?
                                                lol, go Wasa Sultan, it's too bad you're getting death threats for stating an opposing opinion.
                                                See Sig...oh wait.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • elron
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jul 2003
                                                    • 1553
                                                    #43
                                                    Originally posted by Webby
                                                    To be honest, my only interest in this is in the quality of the media and balance (it's something from an early past training) - it's not about Lebanon or Israel, - only about fair and balanced footage.
                                                    Na you only interest was to change the whole subject from discussion about islam , to claiming that memri are hackers and bad editers and some other ridiculous arguments .

                                                      Comment

                                                      • OG LennyT
                                                        Wall Street Pimp
                                                        • Jun 2003
                                                        • 14345
                                                        #44
                                                        Originally posted by Libertine
                                                        She conveniently forgot about the whole issue of zionist terrorism, though.

                                                        your an idiot.
                                                        Tradeking - my online broker | 4.95 a trade | make real $$

                                                          Comment

                                                          • sacX
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Dec 2002
                                                            • 2998
                                                            #45
                                                            Originally posted by dvd316
                                                            your an idiot.
                                                            you're an idiot, idiot.
                                                            Have Asian Language Traffic?

                                                              Comment

                                                              Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
                                                              Working...