Originally posted by TheSenator
-
she's the 'bill cosby' of islam . . whoa! -
If this was in fact a straight "story", - there is no need to cut out all other content. The final version looks like it was edited on a $50 edit suite with obvious chunks pulled out.Originally posted by Lazonby
I spent four years in a basement cinema watching stuff like this (propaganda) - some if can be good, others, not so good - and this is definately in the "not so good category". If that was ever in doubt - just look at the source and reasoning behind even bothering to purchase the material from Al-Jazeera and then go and hack it.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
I still dont get it , you said "badly edited" . removing opposing views are the "badly edit" that you meant ? or did i miss here anything ?Originally posted by WebbyComment
-
Both man... the discussion has been edited out and the "technical cuts" are an abomination.Originally posted by elronXXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
She conveniently forgot about the whole issue of zionist terrorism, though.Originally posted by TheSenator/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
They cut out the opposite views because it's irrelevant . This entire interview was all about her opinion only .Originally posted by WebbyComment
-
Exactly the basis on which MEMRI would attempt to justify the hacking - "let's dump all else, we just want to show her doing the verbal. It serves our purpose". On that alone, all cred just disappears.Originally posted by elron
There's are "art" in editing - part of that does not include cherry-picking.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by Webby
decide already , was it "badly edited" or there were just "technical cuts" ?Comment
-
When cuts destroy the discussion in favour of a single point of view, they aren't technical but political cutsOriginally posted by elron
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Yeah that's what they actually wanted , to show her doing the verbal because you dont hear arab who speak against the islam at the biggest arab media network every day .Originally posted by Webby
How in the hell is that considered as hacking ?Comment
-
that wasn't a discussion from the first place . that's an interview of arab woman who says her opinion .Originally posted by LibertineWhen cuts destroy the discussion in favour of a single point of view, they aren't technical but political cutsComment
-
??? The orginal Al-Jazeera material showing an actual discussion was edited out to show a solo performance of one view. That immediately takes it out of balance and negates the credibility. A "discussion" has more than one view.Originally posted by elron
In addition the whole damned thing was run thru a $50 defective edit suite incapable of managing a sound track without clicks on every part they hacked.
Al-Jazeera's edit staff would be embarassed to produce crap like that
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by Wanton
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
Sure.. hear you - but her opinion don't mean shit when all other aspects have been removed. It's got to have cred and balance - else we might as well pick up any arab woman in the street to let her spew a diatribe.Originally posted by elron
If anything, they probably screwed her whole interview up by hacking the content - she did in fact have valid points - but the editing discredited her because there was no "other side".XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Bottom line here folks is, it does not fit Webby's agenda. His agenda is anti the President, anti America, and anti Americans. Just do a search on his babblings.Originally posted by Webby??? The orginal Al-Jazeera material showing an actual discussion was edited out to show a solo performance of one view. That immediately takes it out of balance and negates the credibility. A "discussion" has more than one view.
In addition the whole damned thing was run thru a $50 defective edit suite incapable of managing a sound track without clicks on every part they hacked.
Al-Jazeera's edit staff would be embarassed to produce crap like thatComment
Comment