Don't know if we're getting any of it, but I do know that we were told by Bush that the war would be paid for with the oil...

How many billions of our money have been thrown over there?

Another lie to get support... But he learned that from his daddy who did a bit of his own false truths to liberate Kuwait.. You know.. the guy that said, "Read my lips.. No new taxes".. resulting in the largest tax hike in history...

Say anything ya have to say to get in office, then do whatever ya want once you're in...

you'll have to post a trascript of what they said and who they are. my time is too valuable to sit through that horse shit.

yeah, we all agreed to go to war because it would be paid for with oil, otherwise, we would have stayed home.:1orglaugh

Yeah but you got the time to sit around and spew your horse shit here on gfy:1orglaugh

Not working with me...

That was one of his lines, among many.. and yes... if people knew the real facts at the time, we would probably have stayed home..

How do you go to war knowing that you are going to get paid in oil?

If we invade China do we know ahead of time that we will get paid in Fortune Cookies?

"What happened to Iraq oil, Mr. President? You said Iraqi oil would pay for the war. Ain't seen no money. Ain't seen no oil," said Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.

...by making Saddam's WMD the rationale for invading Iraq and then coming up empty handed after a long search it's tough to sell an open-ended occupation to a public that was told Iraqi oil would pay for everything.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: ?I don't believe that the United States has the responsibility for reconstruction, in a sense?[Reconstruction] funds can come from those various sources I mentioned: frozen assets, oil revenues and a variety of other things, including the Oil for Food, which has a very substantial number of billions of dollars in it. [Source: Senate Appropriations Hearing, 3/27/03]

Before the war, the Bush administration insisted that Iraqi oil revenue would pay for reconstruction and faced criticism from anti-war activists of a "war for oil." After the oil revenue failed to materialize, Bush, a former Texas oilman himself, rarely mentioned Iraqi oil.

I can do 10 other things while spewing my horseshit here.
I'm not watching some silly video that starts with "in 1962" and goes on to explain our current situation.

you'd have to ask the guy who said thats why we went. Don't let your zeal to try to prove me wrong embarrass you by replying to things I didn't say.:winkwink:

I'm not sure what facts you didn't know but here are the facts that caused me to support the war.
Iraq was a defeated enemy who refused to comply with its surrender agreement. After 9/11 we were not going to have defeated enemies who *had* WMDs continue to not live up to their surrender agreement and play hide and seek with inspectors.
If these aren't your facts, perhaps you shouldn't let your mind be clouded by the revisionist history of the leftist media.:winkwink:

What does WMD have to do with 9/11? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

51:disgust

Thanks for prooving my point.
/out

Ok.. so let's kill off loads of our military men over a 'defeated enemy'.. Logic?

WMD's? Rummy said "We know where they are".. but gee.. NONE!
These are the facts..

Leftist media?? Did ANY media pop up saying they found WMD's? NO!
These are the facts..


Playing hide & seek? What was he hiding? What was found? NOTHING!!
These are the facts..

Who pulled the inspectors out; not letting then finish their job? Uhh.. the guy who wanted to invade Iraq..
These are the facts..

2 countries are bragging of having WMD's and rubbing it in Bush's face.. Is he invading them? NO! But invade Iraq using misinformation to gain 'your' support...
These are the facts..

So Hussy didn't live up to his agreement.. Worth 1000's of people losing their lives over? Proves what? He didn't have much to live up to..

I'm sure Bushy Boy thanks you for your support...

did anyone get this guys point?:1orglaugh

wow. you've done more than drink the liberal kool aide, you've gotten drunk off it.:1orglaugh
yes, kill loads of our millitary so that are civilians are safe.
give me 10 years to play hide and seek and you won't find what I hide either.

you advocate ivading NK and Iran? for how long? until you get the signal to scream Bush Sux again?
continue to down play iraq's threat, its all you liberals have. Of course, with the help of the leftist media, pretty soon, your version of history will be all thats remembered.:thumbsup

Hmm.. you stated your facts.. I stated 'the' facts and that's your response?
so sad...
You putting words in my mouth doesn't work with me either..

I advocate nothing.. Just questions I ask my self...
Perhaps you can help a leftist, liberal, koolaid junkie to understand this:

You have a country who is 'assumed' to have WMD's with no concrete proof or evidence.. This country is attacked, the fight still being fought, still nothing found.. as more and more people die everyday..

Then 2 other countries pop up saying, Hey we have WMD's and there's nothing you can do about it."

Neither of these countries are in our sites insofar as any invasion goes..

Why so gung ho to invade Iraq and not the other two?

I'm sure you have the answer..

So that our civilians are safe?? Like Iraq would attack us... You saw what happened with Kuwait... Iraqi soldiers were lining up to surrender... Yep.. The mother of all wars.. Let's be very afraid...
Why are we still there today? Still looking for WMD's? Ha!

Thinking it's the right idea to attack some country because of what they 'might' do some day is a bit over the top .. even if WMD's were found..

Maybe we should invade Cuba now because Fidele is down and his li'l bro 'might' have evil intentions toward us..

Me thinks you need a stiff shot of my koolaid.. :)

12clicks, youre the kind of a dickwad who would think that Operation Northwoods could never be devised by any US Government, as it is unpatriotic lol

Fucking A! I could happen too.