Sponsors and Processors, Your BIG chance to help... - GoFuckYourself.com

V_RocKs · 08-03-2006, 10:32 PM

...the industy is HERE!

Take a piece of javascript or use an outside third party.

Capture the RESOLUTION of the surfers monitors.
Capture the OPERATING SYSTEM of the surfers computer.
Capture the LOCATION and LANGUAGE of the surfer.
Capture the BROWSER info of the surfer.

Then make all of this data public.

Let us know that the assholes with 800x600 (14%) that still use Windows 98, 95 or ME and use dialup (16%) are worthless...

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:14 PM

never happen, but i wish

BIGTYMER · 08-03-2006, 11:16 PM

Far from worthless.

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:19 PM

gimme a few i'll put together some numbers for you

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:23 PM

1024x768 54%
800x600 16%
1280x1024 10%
1280x800 7%
1152x864 3%
1440x900 2%
1280x768 2%
1400x1050 1%
1680x1050 1%
1600x1200 1%
1280x960 1%
1280x854 1%
1920x1200 0%

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:24 PM

Cable/DSL 76%
Dialup 12%
Corporate 9%
Unknown 3%

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:26 PM

Win XP 89.75%
Mac * 5.25%
Win 2000 5.18%
Win 98 4.43%
Linux 0.3%
Win ME 0.22%

studiocritic · 08-03-2006, 11:28 PM

This is the data from the users that converted out of the last 200,000 uniques on one of my sites.

Should be a similar enough market to be useful data. Good luck.

edit: Also, all of my traffic is North American and English-speaking, so can't help you there.

V_RocKs · 08-03-2006, 11:56 PM

These users all paid in other words?

If so the paying users and the total pool of unique users is about the same.

In other words, there is no destinction that can be drawn between having a larger resolution or a modem and your ability to pay....

everestcash · 08-04-2006, 01:03 AM

thanks for info studiocritic!
so they are not as worthless as i bet many ppl think

V_RocKs · 08-04-2006, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everestcash

thanks for info studiocritic!
so they are not as worthless as i bet many ppl think

Nope as it turns out my theory was incorrect.

According to his data, the ratio of those who buy and the entire surfer pool are identical... So people with 800x600 or modems or windows 98 buy just as often as anyone else.

studiocritic · 08-04-2006, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

Nope as it turns out my theory was incorrect.

According to his data, the ratio of those who buy and the entire surfer pool are identical... So people with 800x600 or modems or windows 98 buy just as often as anyone else.

That is correct, these are people who purchased.. I, too, wish there was a correlation.

mikeyddddd · 08-04-2006, 04:23 PM

Useful info

The Ghost · 08-04-2006, 04:48 PM

Thanks for sharing studiocritic. Larger and more unconventional monitor sizes will be coming soon. I'm currently browsing on 2048x768.

There are positives to the small constrains. It focuses attention more to a single concentrated area. It's possible that browsing is enhanced by the scrolling "surprise" method, where as the information is arrived upon as the surfer determines, instead of dropping a large cluttered amount at once.

Ideally, a site would read the resolution and connection speed of the surfer and load accordingly.

V_RocKs · 08-04-2006, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ghost

Ideally, a site would read the resolution and connection speed of the surfer and load accordingly.

Yeah.... those were the days.... Making 8 sites out of 1...

08-03-2006, 10:32 PM	#1
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,428	Sponsors and Processors, Your BIG chance to help... ...the industy is HERE! Take a piece of javascript or use an outside third party. Capture the RESOLUTION of the surfers monitors. Capture the OPERATING SYSTEM of the surfers computer. Capture the LOCATION and LANGUAGE of the surfer. Capture the BROWSER info of the surfer. Then make all of this data public. Let us know that the assholes with 800x600 (14%) that still use Windows 98, 95 or ME and use dialup (16%) are worthless...

08-03-2006, 11:14 PM	#2
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	never happen, but i wish __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:19 PM	#4
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	gimme a few i'll put together some numbers for you __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:23 PM	#5
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	1024x768 54% 800x600 16% 1280x1024 10% 1280x800 7% 1152x864 3% 1440x900 2% 1280x768 2% 1400x1050 1% 1680x1050 1% 1600x1200 1% 1280x960 1% 1280x854 1% 1920x1200 0% __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:24 PM	#6
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	Cable/DSL 76% Dialup 12% Corporate 9% Unknown 3% __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:16 PM	#3
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	Far from worthless.

08-03-2006, 11:26 PM	#7
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	Win XP 89.75% Mac * 5.25% Win 2000 5.18% Win 98 4.43% Linux 0.3% Win ME 0.22% __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:28 PM	#8
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	This is the data from the users that converted out of the last 200,000 uniques on one of my sites. Should be a similar enough market to be useful data. Good luck. edit: Also, all of my traffic is North American and English-speaking, so can't help you there. __________________ 254342256

08-03-2006, 11:56 PM	#9
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,428	These users all paid in other words? If so the paying users and the total pool of unique users is about the same. In other words, there is no destinction that can be drawn between having a larger resolution or a modem and your ability to pay....

08-04-2006, 01:03 AM	#10
everestcash Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 2,194	thanks for info studiocritic! so they are not as worthless as i bet many ppl think __________________ Got solo girls/teen traffic? Promote our exclusive solo girl sites and boost your income!

08-04-2006, 04:23 PM	#13
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	Useful info __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys

08-04-2006, 04:48 PM	#14
The Ghost IslandDollars.com Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Icq: 176176 Posts: 12,188	Thanks for sharing studiocritic. Larger and more unconventional monitor sizes will be coming soon. I'm currently browsing on 2048x768. There are positives to the small constrains. It focuses attention more to a single concentrated area. It's possible that browsing is enhanced by the scrolling "surprise" method, where as the information is arrived upon as the surfer determines, instead of dropping a large cluttered amount at once. Ideally, a site would read the resolution and connection speed of the surfer and load accordingly. __________________ ISLAND DOLLARS 1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates Best TS Network your surfers will ever join