...and the world does still not get it 
-
-
and george washington
-
did he win it without using weapons?Originally posted by artmanComment
-
Ghandi didnt win any war... he was 'non-violent'... but his method helped India gain independence from British rule. He also was/is a source of inspiration for non-violent protestors... like MLK.
but he didnt win a warComment
-
Originally posted by Dirty Dane
Ghandi had a weapon. He stunk like hell, not bathing for over 12 years. Multitudes of people were harmed by the vapors.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirty Dane...and the world does still not get it
WTF does Ben Kingsley have to do with anything?Comment
-
That depends on how you define a war and the outcome. When we normally think of war, its with violence to compel the enemy to fullfill your will. The British Empire was the most powerful empire at that time, and Gandhi proved that it could be fought without violence. He won the right way, the others did not win at all.Originally posted by dvd316
My point is that you can win a war without violence, like he did. Its the passive part that get international sympathy, and by turning the agressive part into sense instead of madness.
Jesus said the same, but still christian countries act hypocratic
Comment
-
i thoughtthat was Mao Zedong when he was old.Originally posted by MattO
He also slept with virgines every night with a new one.Comment
Comment