![]() |
50.....,.....
|
Fitty..........one:disgust
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
UN troops are no different to NATO troops or any others. The function required is more related to cooling a scenario than bombing the shit out of it. A mix of UN forces with a mandate is clearly more appropriate in this scenario and, little doubts, that is the way it is heading. NATO does not represent the international community and it is not an "independent broker". PS Iraq has recently been considering a UN peace force in that country - it's obvious why. US forces were never trained to handle any scenario that involved "firm diplomacy" - this has been demonstrated for decades. Of course, it would let Bush off the hook for the shit he started if that did happen. |
Quote:
And the Bedouins and all the other people that lived there, like the Palestinians who were displaced when the country was created? It most certainly never belonged to Israel, except from Biblical promises and a hope and a prayer. |
Interesting discussion. I've learned a lot.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
.... little joke ;-) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If not a mistake, creating Israel in the middle east was most certainly a sub optimal decision. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and no, they are not speaking the truth, because they (and you) don't know all the facts... and no, you will never understand, so it's not even worth the discussion... :) for a legitimate discussion to occur, the two sides must have SOME common basic assumptions... you're calling my country a mistake, and view me as a land stealer, occupier or whatever.... how can I discuss anything with you? |
Quote:
Quote:
quoted from the same post....classic! :1orglaugh |
Quote:
No, the Palestinians are being walled in. They also have no control over their borders, air space or sea port. Explain to me how that's not a concentration camp and I'll buy you a beer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh right, you guys are just looking for fairness. That's why you call all Muslims terrorists and demand that they disarm before begining negotiations. How logical. |
Quote:
To expect anything other than an explosion from places like Gaza where people are under oppression and with little resources, is like living in lala land. Latest news report from the Gaza area: Quote:
|
it's too late for that now
|
Quote:
exactly! at least someone knows their history.. duke |
less of these damn threads
|
Lookin good up in here.
|
Lookin good up in here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Absorb and learn Sexy - depending on the mandate under which any troops operate is the criteria as to whether they are effective. Currently UN troops in Lebanaon do not have an appropriate mandate and this is currently being addressed. If troops are mandated to hand out "aid packages" - that is what they will do. That is currently not the mandate of UN troops in Lebanon. Where do you get this "effective force" from? Are you now suggesting a fighting force for this region? If so, that is all the US could offer, - but sometimes there is need for some common sense and firmness in negotiating a calm in an area - that does not mean bombing the shit out of it. Basically you are not even qualified even discuss the Middle East - you live in the US and are fed the biggest pile of shit leaving you to form opinions which are both irrelvant and ignorant. Bottom line - you have nothing to offer the Middle East or any other nation. |
Quote:
Are you finished sucking the American tourist's dicks for the day asswipe? Did you earn enough for a room for the night or do you actually have your own shack? |
Quote:
I don't wast time on the leftovers of human trash - crawl up Bush's ass and check if there is sunshine and have a discussion about stem cell research. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Have you *anything* to say that is in any way constructive of a contribution to this thread? That is... apart from "They are not bombs", "155 artillary shells", "UN troops were and are in Lebanon. UN troops are always ineffective. Move in NATO forces if one wants an effective force." and "I disagree. Artillary shells can and do kill people" and your pathetic attempted "attacks" over third world countries and "tourist's dicks". Your relevance is awesome. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BTW Sicko Sexy... US troops have never been effective in Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq or almost any other place they were present, even tho the only job they had was blowing shit up and killing people. Engaging in a peace process is a bit harder than shooting off guns and bombing - fat chance of being able to do that.
Make contact with Bush's brain cell by crawling up his ass and let him know these facts of life Sexy:winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Originally EU, but operating in Costa Rica, Caribbean and the EU. |
Quote:
I am out of here. I have a steaks on the bar-b-q and a late night friend coming over. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I feel sorry for anyone you claim is a friend of yours and sure as fuck doubt they are even in the league of being able to afford a "vacation home" in a "third world country" - nevermind checking on fuck all :1orglaugh. You got a habit of disappearing with some bullshit claims of having steaks cooking - dream on :winkwink: |
bump for the early risers putting philly on their bagels and lochs right at this moment.
|
Quote:
The Palestinians are, of course, treated atrociously. |
UN Troops. Sometimes they have been "effective" and sometimes not. Every situation and response is different.
I remember reading some whitepapers on the subject. I'm sure they can be found easily. |
Quote:
But are nation-building tasks "harder" than military ones? Moving a military halfway across the world and then occupying a capital in 21 days is "very hard". |
Quote:
The Iran-Iraq war itself caused more death than whole israel-arab wars together . Israel actually did a big favour for arab countries by uniting them all against israel , and yet arab states kept fighting eachother all along . |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123