Crap: - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

SleazyDream · 06-14-2002, 06:38 AM

occosionally 12clicks says something whitty - but more and more he's just playing the role of the fool and it's been a long time since he has said anything of any merit whatsoever .........

Pathfinder · 06-14-2002, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Alex From San Diego
Hey Pathfinder,

Just curious but were you associated with the Pathfinder company at Ft Campbell, KY? If so what years? I was there back in '82 I also was an Air Assault Instructor before I volunteered for SF. I finished my career as an 18D with 7th Group at Ft. Bragg in '89.....

Ah the good ole days......

I first served as a Pathfinder with the 82nd Airborne Division at Ft. Bragg, in the mid fifties. In my career I was never stationed at Ft. Campbell. Several of my school mates were, but that would have been before your time, so you wouldn't know them.

I am sure you are aware of the drop made in '57 (if I recall the year correctly) at Ft. Campbell, when the wind speeds were high (gusting to more than 30 knots) and several jumpers were killed. One of my school mates jumped that day. He survived it and gave me a detailed account of that drop.

Years and years later I read General Westmoreland's book and in the book he spoke about the drop made that day (he of course was not a General then). Comparing his account to my friends account (I believe my friends account), Westmorland lied about certain aspects of the drop.

By the way: AIRBORNE!!

12clicks · 06-14-2002, 06:57 AM

cheesey, your not still mad about this are you?

<img SRC="http://www.12clicks.com/photo1.jpg"

doesn't this shot just scream success?

don't hate the messenger, hate the message.

Pathfinder · 06-14-2002, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
occosionally 12clicks says something whitty - but more and more he's just playing the role of the fool and it's been a long time since he has said anything of any merit whatsoever .........

Sleazy he is not witty, just shitty, like a goose.

Quote:

When this wise man points his finger, 12miss the fool pulls it.

12clicks · 06-14-2002, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pathfinder
Sleazy he is not witty, just shitty, like a goose.

unfortunately, even geese make better parents than you.

call me a fag, call me a goose, call me what you'd like. I just thank god I'm not you. hahahaha

Pathfinder · 06-14-2002, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
I just thank god I'm not you. hahahaha

I am glad that you do, for then I would be you.

Quote:

When this wise man points his finger, 12miss the fool pulls it.

12clicks · 06-14-2002, 07:47 AM

hahahaha, what's your next comeback old timer,"I'm rubber and you're glue"?

hahahahaha

Pathfinder · 06-14-2002, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pathfinder
I just learned today that the SOB is out of jail. He wasn't arraigned within 72 working hours so by law he had to be released.

I don't know enough about the law to know if this means that he walks on all charges, or if the prosecuter can still charge him and put him back in jail.

Any learned input about this subject?

I haven't spoken with my daughter recently so I don't know what the insurance staus is.

Does anyone have any knowledge about this?

Pathfinder · 06-25-2002, 08:43 AM

To update:

Since my daughters boyfriend was on her policy the insurance is apparently going to pay for her car being totaled out, but she has not received a check yet. Until she has received a check it will not be finalized.

In addition her boyfriend still will have to answer in court to the charges that were filed against him.

As it turns out he signed a wavier for the 72 hour rule in order to be released.

Frank W · 06-25-2002, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pathfinder
Two questions:

#1: Under the circumstances do you think her insurance will pay?

#2: Do you think a stolen vehicle charge will hold up against him?

1) Since she explicitly asked the guy to be EXCLUDED from her insurance, there is no coverage for him. Normally, insurance covers anyone she lends her car to. But since she explicitly excluded him [people usually do this to lower their rates], he is not covered, therefore the accident is not covered.

2) According to common law in the US [state statutes may differ] larceny is the trespassory taking of another's property with the intent to deprive that person of the property permanently. Since the permanent deprivation is at issue -- he may claim he intended to return the car, he probably can fight the grand theft auto charge. However, most states have anti-"joyriding" statutes--they may be able to make this type of charge stick.

Pathfinder · 06-25-2002, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Frank W

1) Since she explicitly asked the guy to be EXCLUDED from her insurance, there is no coverage for him. Normally, insurance covers anyone she lends her car to. But since she explicitly excluded him [people usually do this to lower their rates], he is not covered, therefore the accident is not covered.

2) According to common law in the US [state statutes may differ] larceny is the trespassory taking of another's property with the intent to deprive that person of the property permanently. Since the permanent deprivation is at issue -- he may claim he intended to return the car, he probably can fight the grand theft auto charge. However, most states have anti-"joyriding" statutes--they may be able to make this type of charge stick.

According to my daughter the insurance company is indicating that they are going to pay since he had not been removed from the policy at the time of the accident. As I stated in the post above it will not be finalized until she gets a check. She is still, of course, taking a several thousand dollar loss.

I seriously doubt that he will be stuck with stealing the car, especially since she is not going to persue it, but all of the other charges will stick.

Pathfinder · 07-03-2002, 12:27 PM

The insurance company paid. My daughter received the check today. It will pay the car off and put some cash in her pocket but she still suffers more than a $4,000.00 loss.

Her boyfriend still has not been charged by the DA, but I have learned the DA has up to twelve months to bring charges. I am satisified that the DUI, driving with a suspended license, and fleeing the scene of an accident, charges will be brought against him, but probably not GTA.

06-14-2002, 06:38 AM	#51
SleazyDream I'm here for SPORT Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696 Posts: 41,470	occosionally 12clicks says something whitty - but more and more he's just playing the role of the fool and it's been a long time since he has said anything of any merit whatsoever ......... __________________ This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog! Now read without the word dog.

06-14-2002, 06:57 AM	#53
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,813	cheesey, your not still mad about this are you? <img SRC="http://www.12clicks.com/photo1.jpg" doesn't this shot just scream success? don't hate the messenger, hate the message. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

06-14-2002, 07:47 AM	#57
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,813	hahahaha, what's your next comeback old timer,"I'm rubber and you're glue"? hahahahaha __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

06-25-2002, 08:43 AM	#59
Pathfinder theking of trailer parks Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Tehachapi, California Posts: 2,290	To update: Since my daughters boyfriend was on her policy the insurance is apparently going to pay for her car being totaled out, but she has not received a check yet. Until she has received a check it will not be finalized. In addition her boyfriend still will have to answer in court to the charges that were filed against him. As it turns out he signed a wavier for the 72 hour rule in order to be released. Last edited by Pathfinder; 06-25-2002 at 08:46 AM..

07-03-2002, 12:27 PM	#62
Pathfinder theking of trailer parks Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Tehachapi, California Posts: 2,290	The insurance company paid. My daughter received the check today. It will pay the car off and put some cash in her pocket but she still suffers more than a $4,000.00 loss. Her boyfriend still has not been charged by the DA, but I have learned the DA has up to twelve months to bring charges. I am satisified that the DUI, driving with a suspended license, and fleeing the scene of an accident, charges will be brought against him, but probably not GTA.