occosionally 12clicks says something whitty - but more and more he's just playing the role of the fool and it's been a long time since he has said anything of any merit whatsoever .........

I first served as a Pathfinder with the 82nd Airborne Division at Ft. Bragg, in the mid fifties. In my career I was never stationed at Ft. Campbell. Several of my school mates were, but that would have been before your time, so you wouldn't know them.

I am sure you are aware of the drop made in '57 (if I recall the year correctly) at Ft. Campbell, when the wind speeds were high (gusting to more than 30 knots) and several jumpers were killed. One of my school mates jumped that day. He survived it and gave me a detailed account of that drop.

Years and years later I read General Westmoreland's book and in the book he spoke about the drop made that day (he of course was not a General then). Comparing his account to my friends account (I believe my friends account), Westmorland lied about certain aspects of the drop.

By the way: AIRBORNE!!

cheesey, your not still mad about this are you?

<img SRC="http://www.12clicks.com/photo1.jpg"

doesn't this shot just scream success?:1orglaugh :1orglaugh



don't hate the messenger, hate the message. :1orglaugh

Sleazy he is not witty, just shitty, like a goose.

unfortunately, even geese make better parents than you.

call me a fag, call me a goose, call me what you'd like. I just thank god I'm not you. hahahaha

I am glad that you do, for then I would be you.

hahahaha, what's your next comeback old timer,"I'm rubber and you're glue"?

hahahahaha

Does anyone have any knowledge about this?

To update:

Since my daughters boyfriend was on her policy the insurance is apparently going to pay for her car being totaled out, but she has not received a check yet. Until she has received a check it will not be finalized.

In addition her boyfriend still will have to answer in court to the charges that were filed against him.

As it turns out he signed a wavier for the 72 hour rule in order to be released.

1) Since she explicitly asked the guy to be EXCLUDED from her insurance, there is no coverage for him. Normally, insurance covers anyone she lends her car to. But since she explicitly excluded him [people usually do this to lower their rates], he is not covered, therefore the accident is not covered.

2) According to common law in the US [state statutes may differ] larceny is the trespassory taking of another's property with the intent to deprive that person of the property permanently. Since the permanent deprivation is at issue -- he may claim he intended to return the car, he probably can fight the grand theft auto charge. However, most states have anti-"joyriding" statutes--they may be able to make this type of charge stick.

According to my daughter the insurance company is indicating that they are going to pay since he had not been removed from the policy at the time of the accident. As I stated in the post above it will not be finalized until she gets a check. She is still, of course, taking a several thousand dollar loss.

I seriously doubt that he will be stuck with stealing the car, especially since she is not going to persue it, but all of the other charges will stick.

The insurance company paid. My daughter received the check today. It will pay the car off and put some cash in her pocket but she still suffers more than a $4,000.00 loss.

Her boyfriend still has not been charged by the DA, but I have learned the DA has up to twelve months to bring charges. I am satisified that the DUI, driving with a suspended license, and fleeing the scene of an accident, charges will be brought against him, but probably not GTA.