Tesla Electric Car - sexy... nice...
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Agreed, this is an electric car I would own!
Great video about the car:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zIFgzx-wJcU
V4.0 It's Here! NOT JUST AVS ANYMORE!
Teen Whore Fetish All Milf Sluts Real Asian Cunts All Latina Cunts Massive XXX Boobs All Out Anal
Since 1997. ICQ: 107746038Comment
-
How much are they. that is one nice looking machine.
And how long before the government stops the production.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
$100K technology costs I guess! that is quite a bit for an electric car.
V4.0 It's Here! NOT JUST AVS ANYMORE!
Teen Whore Fetish All Milf Sluts Real Asian Cunts All Latina Cunts Massive XXX Boobs All Out Anal
Since 1997. ICQ: 107746038Comment
-
I know one guy who will love this... right babe !?Behind every great woman, is a guy looking at her ass.Comment
-
I thought that to. I watched a couple vids of it, it is really quite at low speed or sitting still, but under power it sounded pretty cool actually. Wasn't quite loud enough maybe for some revheads, but as someone who loves the sound of a big engine, I thought the turbo/whizz sound was pretty cool.Originally posted by MinteAs long as they make it sound like a lambo or a ferrari it will be great.
I'd miss the sounds of the engine.ICQ: 637//961--015Comment
-
Apparently it comes with a cord that plugs into a regular wall socket. I think that takes 5 hours, however I read somewhere they are also working to build high powered recharging plants, but at the moment the best recharge time was 2-3 hours. I was reading up about their plan, who was behind it (Elon Musk [paypal founder], Larry page, Sergey Brin, etc) and they seem to be a very promising company. I look forward to seeing the release of their planned $50k and than $25k electric family cars over the next few years.Originally posted by mrthumbshow do you charge a car like that?ICQ: 637//961--015Comment
-
Nice curves...Comment
-
-
I'm surprised it doesn't cost more.9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!

ADULT DATING - $100 PPS
LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS
WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM
ICQ: 27442303Comment
-
-
Yep, my business partner and I were talking about that tonight. We live in an area where the majority of power plants are coal burning. So if everyone around here bought one of those cars, the polution from the cars would decrease, but the polution from the power plants would increase...so it's a no win situation. Plus, $100K for a car....fuck that!Originally posted by volanteFor people with more money than sense. Buy the Lotus Elise on which it's based and you could spend the $60k you save on fuel and planting trees.Comment
-
Overall, even if every powerplant burnt coal, and all cars converted to electric there would be less pollution. Read the studies on their website, etc. I am kind of interested in this issue, although not worked up too much on one solution or another (i.e. electric over hydrogen or vice verse). But wouldn't be nice to live in a world were we weren't hostage to the Muslim radicals of Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc, where 90% of their populations survive on Government handouts that come directly from our pocket at the pump? It would be a nice big fuck you if we could get real about moving away from oil. And plus, by the time electric or hydrogen cars start hitting the road in huge numbers ITER's 13 billion dollar experimental powerplant will be online and working, and Governments around the world will hopefully start investing in what it has to offer for domestic power supply. Perhaps it is dreaming, but what a combination that could make, a safe, clean, essentially limitless source of electricity, and electric powered cars. I think this is a great first step, when they get down to their $25k electric family car that they have planned I hope it takes off. Plus there are plenty of solutions in the work for the many problems that need to be overcome, such as ultracapacitors that can be fully recharged in 5 minutes or less. This is just the start of a new market I hope, one which will attract alot of investment.Originally posted by SlamDesignsYep, my business partner and I were talking about that tonight. We live in an area where the majority of power plants are coal burning. So if everyone around here bought one of those cars, the polution from the cars would decrease, but the polution from the power plants would increase...so it's a no win situation. Plus, $100K for a car....fuck that!
http://www.iter.org/Last edited by Odin; 09-30-2006, 10:50 PM.ICQ: 637//961--015Comment
-
Will switching to an ALL ELECTRIC vehicle system just switch fossil fuel pollution from the car level to the power plant level?Comment
-
From their FAQOriginally posted by $5 submissionsWill switching to an ALL ELECTRIC vehicle system just switch fossil fuel pollution from the car level to the power plant level?
Don't electric vehicles actually just move pollution to another location? And therefore don't EVs still use oil?
No. Electric power generation in the USA does not use oil. Coal, hydro, nuclear, solar, and natural gas are typical sources for generating electricity. Power generation plants, even coal burning ones, are inherently more efficient and less polluting than vehicles due to economies of scale and the ability to more efficiently remove pollutants from a smaller number of much larger fixed locations.
Also, an electric car is far more efficient than a gasoline car, so the amount of pollution generated by producing the electricity to drive an EV a given distance is much less than the pollution from the gasoline to drive an internal combustion car the same distance.
View more info here:
http://www.teslamotors.com/learn_mor...l_benefits.phpICQ: 637//961--015Comment
-
hot car
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip ManagerComment
-
First really sharp looking electric car I've seen.
There's a company down in Texas that has developed an incredible new electric motor system with a revolutionary battery mechanism. It completely charges in 5 minutes and can go 500 miles on one charge, about double the distance of most gas engines. It can also drive at high speed and solid torgue just like a regular engine.
Even though the engine will cost more than a combustion engine, the net cost works out to an equivalent of about 45 cents per gallon.
Expected to be out in 2008 and ideal for SUV market.
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains
Adult News
KRL's Newsletter
Biz Tips
Just Listed DomainsComment
-
Well, it's still rumors from what I read. There has been a lot of buzz about the company since it filed its patent for the technology for its ultracapacitor technology. The company has really tried to avoid the spotlight thus far though, and everyone is eagerly waiting to see if they can live up to the claims filed in their patents when Feel Good Cars releases a 2008 model car that is meant to implement its technology. If it lives up to the claims, and the rumors it may prove to be one of the greatest technological breakthroughs in recent times, and it will certainly deliver a close to knockout blow to the complete control petrol fueled cars have on the market. But again, there is also alot of skeptisicm that the product you are talking about can live up to expectations, it seems almost too good to be true, and although a lot of big names and investors are behind the company noone is ready to believe it yet. I read also that Tesla motors is hoping it can move to some sort of ultracapcitor system in its future cars also.Originally posted by KRLFirst really sharp looking electric car I've seen.
There's a company down in Texas that has developed an incredible new electric motor system with a revolutionary battery mechanism. It completely charges in 5 minutes and can go 500 miles on one charge, about double the distance of most gas engines. It can also drive at high speed and solid torgue just like a regular engine.
Even though the engine will cost more than a combustion engine, the net cost works out to an equivalent of about 45 cents per gallon.
Expected to be out in 2008 and ideal for SUV market.ICQ: 637//961--015Comment
-
Actually the battery is the new technology and it is known ast the M1 battery and it's already in testing for production around 2008. It's still a lithium ion battery but doesn't explode if crushed, recharges 80% in 5 minutes, runs at a high voltage, and has a 30-80% higher energy density.
All this means it is safer, becomes feasible for fully electric cars as compared to needing hybrids, could be "filled up" at a gas station, would develop more torque, and would allow you do drive further on the same number of batteries.
When applied to cell phones, power tools, and laptops; just imagine.
David.
DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour ModelComment
-
While the oil use of a car like this is greatly reduced, the energy consumed over the cars lifetime is actually FAR MORE than a normal car. What people don't realise is that it takes more energy to build a car than it will to run it for it's entire life, and cars like this require more energy to build than regular cars - for example, a Toyota Prius will, over it's lifetime, require more energy to build and run than a regular SUV.Originally posted by ChiefFrom their FAQ
Don't electric vehicles actually just move pollution to another location? And therefore don't EVs still use oil?
No. Electric power generation in the USA does not use oil. Coal, hydro, nuclear, solar, and natural gas are typical sources for generating electricity. Power generation plants, even coal burning ones, are inherently more efficient and less polluting than vehicles due to economies of scale and the ability to more efficiently remove pollutants from a smaller number of much larger fixed locations.
Also, an electric car is far more efficient than a gasoline car, so the amount of pollution generated by producing the electricity to drive an EV a given distance is much less than the pollution from the gasoline to drive an internal combustion car the same distance.
Bioethanol might be an option if you want to reduce reliance on oil (Here's a Lotus Exige that runs on the stuff), but it also has problems - fuel efficiency will plummet, it's inefficient to produce (You'd need the equivalent of one and a half gallons of bioethanol to refine a single gallon of bioethanol) and don't expect all cars to be running on it unless you fancy starving to death because there's nowhere left to grow regular crops.Comment
-
I certainly hope that the rest of the world gets their act together much like what Brazil is doing:::::
Today, 42 percent of Brazil's energy use comes from renewable sources, compared with 6 percent for OECD countries. Around 90 percent of Brazil's electricity comes from hydropower. Brazil is also the world's largest producer and consumer of fuel ethanol from sugarcane as a transportation fuel, an achievement possible because it is the world's most efficient producer of sugarcane, which accounts for about 60 percent of the cost of ethanol production. The ethanol program in Brazil is saving around 180,000 barrels per day of gasoline, valued at about US$4 billion per year. This means that about 24 million tons less CO2 are added to the atmosphere each year.


RIP TDComment
-
Looks like a Lotis Elise 2..
but thats a good thing though.. very nice car this is!Download the much improved Free Tube Script adult/mainstream tube solution for FREE!Comment
-
Oops, i just read that it is actualy based on one.. :-)Originally posted by GodsmackLooks like a Lotis Elise 2..
but thats a good thing though.. very nice car this is!Download the much improved Free Tube Script adult/mainstream tube solution for FREE!Comment
-
I've seen a Japanese video featuring this innovation as well. However, the cars which they feature there were not that classy compared to that one on top. They were simply light and simple--vehicles that are made for practical purposes.Last edited by rodney25; 10-01-2006, 09:01 PM.
AFFORDABLE Hosting -- Extreme Dependability -- FULL Service
ICQ ME for DAMN GOOD HOSTING DEALS: 5380773Comment
-
-
woo, that's hot!Prime Outsourcing│offshore solutions│manual labor│staff leasing│full time employees
starting at $695.00/month=managed and dedicated | icq: 309570461 | live chatComment
-
Educate me, please ......Originally posted by volanteWhile the oil use of a car like this is greatly reduced, the energy consumed over the cars lifetime is actually FAR MORE than a normal car. What people don't realise is that it takes more energy to build a car than it will to run it for it's entire life, and cars like this require more energy to build than regular cars - for example, a Toyota Prius will, over it's lifetime, require more energy to build and run than a regular SUV.
Comment
-
nice car but there's still disadvantages... like charging takes too long..Email: [email protected] | Skype: ross.alcazarComment
-
Originally posted by L-PinkEducate me, please ......
http://www.pistonheads.com/news/defa...?storyId=13577The debate over the effectiveness of hybrid-powered vehicles at delivering anything other than lower mileage figures has just heated up. A US marketing company has released research showing that when you take the whole life costs of such a vehicle into account, they're not better for the planet after all.
Hybrid petrol electric vehicle advocates trumpet the environmental benefits of the petrol-electric vehicles, but, according to the results of an exhaustive two year study, the overall energy picture for hybrid vehicles isn’t as favourable as it seems. Oregon-based CNW Marketing Research said that, when the total cost of hybrids to the environment is calculated, including factors like original production and then recycling of batteries and electric motors, into a "dollars per lifetime mile" figure, hybrids come up short against conventional powered vehicles which where thought to consume more of the world’s energy.
"If a consumer is concerned about fuel economy because of family budgets or depleting oil supplies, it is perfectly logical to consider buying high-fuel-economy vehicles," said company boss Art Spinella. "But if the concern is the broader issues such as environmental impact of energy usage taking into account the energy needed to plan, build, sell, drive and dispose of a vehicle from concept to scrappage some high economy vehicles actually cost society more than conventional or even larger models over their lifetime."
CNW’s "Dust to Dust" survey studied hundreds of variables but to make it easy for the consumer to understand, developed an energy cost per mile driven figure. While some of the vehicles referred to aren't sold in the UK or Europe, the overall thrust of the research makes sense.
Topping the league with the most "energy expensive" vehicle from 2005 is the Maybach at $11.58 per mile, VW Phaeton at $11.213 and Rolls-Royce Phantom at $10.660 while the thriftiest is the Scion xB at the bottom of the scale, at $0.48 a mile, ahead of the Ford Escort at $0.568 and Jeep Wrangler at $0.604. However, the research brings into question the whole concept of hybrids as "energy-saving", at least for the planet as a whole.
The industry average of 312 vehicles was $2.281, yet all the hybrids cost more than this. Compact family hybrids like the Toyota Prius ($3.249) and Honda Civic hybrid ($3.238), cost more than a full size SUV Land Rover Discovery ($2.525) or Lincoln Navigator ($2.617). By comparison, America’s best selling car, the mid-size Toyota Camry, cost $1.954 and the similar Nissan Altima only $1.381. Hybrids on the other hand cost more over their lifetime due to the extra complexity and production and recycling costs: the Hybrid Honda Accord has an energy cost per mile of $3.29 while the regular version’s is $2.18. A regular Honda Civic costs $2.420.
"This study is not the end of the energy-usage discussion. We hope to see a dialog begin that puts educated and aware consumers into energy policy decisions," Spinella said. "We undertook this research to see if perceptions were true in the real world."Comment
-
awesome, very beautiful and economicTubes Booster - Adult Tube Site CMS
Marketing • SEO • Video Upload Services • Buy & Sell BacklinksComment
-
Now i think i know everything about hybrid-powered vehicles.
Comment












Comment