Tools>>Internet Options>>Content--ContentAdvisor>>Settings(modify)--Enable.

If websites aren't rated and ContentAdvisor is on, then access is denied. So it seems that even if websites that don't label themselves for whatever reason still won't be seen if parents would simply utilize the tools that have been available for years.

Another thought for adult type sites that are not blocked by 'NetGear' type filtering(which is pretty simple as it uses and blocks specific strings within a URL)
Instead of using www.thehun.com(just an example domain without any 'adult' words within it), it would be simple to add to/change the 'www' to another adult word, say like 'adult' with a simple mod of the server config.
So now instead of www.thehun.com it could be adult.thehun.com, which would help some of the simplest filtering technologies.

Then one might also be able to use software utilized by sites like WebmasterWorld. They allow Google to spider all this content on their sites which allows them to be found within the search index. But when coming from outside links you are required to login or join in order to see it. In the typical link type site that join/login could simply be an age verification type deallybob.

WHY is usually a rather redundant question... I encourage everybody to acknowledge that 'they' DO... and respond accordingly. Make a proactive effort to educate society in general as best you can, and also make sure you protect yourself in the meantime.

They told us this was going down back in February... Debating the flaws in the logic now is still important, sure... but seriously, also do what you must right now in order to stay in business.

My somewhat simplistic article about this is in the March issue of GayVN Magazine.


:thumbsup

I think of the many times that I argued with some at this forum who insisted there was not a coming crackdown on online content. When the people who have the authority to do so say they are going to do it why would you not believe them?

:Oh crap

B and C are good ideas.

It depends from what exactly you want to protect them from... Online molesters? unproper images? internet addiction?

Congress have no idea what they are doing. Backwards idiots cant protect our borders how the fuck can they figure out how to protect our kids.

Well this week the hearings are pretty much covering all of the above.

There is no need to protect children online. Online is not a child's arena.

Want a law? Make allowing children unsupervised access to the internet illegal, as is allowing them to do other things they are by law not legally old enough to do (drink, drive, smoke, etc.).

http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/...55/hearing.htm

If you think that they only attack the adult industry, you should listen to this hearing

I'd say not letting a child use the internet unsupervised is the first step. The fucking internet is not a babysitter. How bout some god damn parental responsibility?

Catholic priests hurt more children every year than online pornography does.

50.......,.