|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Dordogne
Posts: 1,614
|
What size images on a Hosted Gallery?
I've just been having a look around our competition's FHG's and noticed in general that many keep the image sizes pretty small; for example nubiles typically use 762x507
We always keep the images on our Hosted Gals at the size they are in members area (1752x1220 or larger) - theory being if a surfer looks at a gallery he is more likely to be swayed by seeing them full size then cut down versions. Feedback from members shows they like big images. For example a typical TeenDreams Hosted Gallery: http://www.teendreams.com/tgp/20/julia/ What do you think, are we wasting bandwidth, or do you think its better to keep the Hi-resolution images?
__________________
Promote the webs Highest Rated Teen Paysite TeenDreams.com. #1 Teen Paysite at almost every review site on the internet. Over 4,500 FHG's and 100's of Hosted Flash Movies and FLV dump Tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,274
|
the big images do look nice. Maybe try doing a test to see if it appears to make a significant difference in conversions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Bar
Posts: 617
|
we use 1200hx1024w on our FHG's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10,127
|
yeah, the big pictures look way better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CheapAssDesigns.com
Posts: 1,874
|
You don't really need that big pictures. Keep in mind that you have a selling point in telling the surfer he can get access to the fullsize hq pics in the members area.
Most surfers have 1280x1024 anyway, so something like 600x800/800x600 and like 60-70kb should work just as well as anything bigger - and save you a lot of bw.
__________________
CheapAssDesigns.com - when you need quality designs at affordable prices. icq: 230-729-205 info |at| cheap ass designs dot com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Jesus loves bacon
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sin City, Motherfucker
Posts: 19,969
|
Quote:
__________________
Support my new movie “The Second Coming” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cowtown, USA
Posts: 32,428
|
600x500 maximums with something on it talking about how much bigger they are in the members area.
|
|
|
|