The Question of Banning:

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pathfinder
    theking of trailer parks
    • Sep 2001
    • 2290

    #1

    The Question of Banning:

    There is so much BS on this board every day that I think calling for the banning of a member in general is BS.

    I do think that if a single standard for banning were to be applied it should be applied to known cheaters/scammers.

    Right now we have a known cheater/scammer posting on this board. That person is "TennisAce" currently using the nick Nzdesignz. He not only is a known cheater/scammer; but is also obnoxous in the way he is posting. Jumping in on virtually every thread, with his juvenile remarks.

    Anyhow the bottom line for this post is my single standard for banning.

    I am interested if others care to post what their single standard would be?
  • NzDesignz
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2002
    • 422

    #2


    The point of this thread was to get at me wasnt it? well done for slipping that in the conversation..

    ICQ: 93319989

    Comment

    • Pathfinder
      theking of trailer parks
      • Sep 2001
      • 2290

      #3
      To get you off this board would be a plus. You are a self confessed cheater/scammer.

      Comment

      • NzDesignz
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2002
        • 422

        #4
        LMAO, I have admitted I did wrong in the past and have changed, The first thing to make a changed man is to know he was "fucked up" to start with right?

        ICQ: 93319989

        Comment

        • Pathfinder
          theking of trailer parks
          • Sep 2001
          • 2290

          #5
          People do not change overnight, days, weeks, or months. Sometimes people change over decades, either for the better, or for the worse.

          You are a juvenile conman working on ingratiating yourself so that you can run your next scam. An easy read for any discerning person.

          Comment

          • Pathfinder
            theking of trailer parks
            • Sep 2001
            • 2290

            #6
            I don't know who closed this thread but it is open again.

            Comment

            Working...