|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-06-2006, 09:58 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ICQ: 248877409
Posts: 8,597
|
AMD or Pentium servers- what do you prefer?
amd 3200 or pent 4 2.8
what do you prefer and why.  |
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 10:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Old Skool GFY Negro
Posts: 2,308
|
Never buy AMD......
They dont work half the time. |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 10:11 AM
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gringo in Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,204
|
Never buy Intel......
They dont work half the time. On a serious note, it doesn't really matter. What matters most is the operating system when it comes to reliability. |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 10:46 AM
|
#4 |
|
Biz Dev and SEO
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,186
|
intel (avoid celeron) + linux/unix (avoid win)...
__________________
--- Busy ranking websites on Google... 
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 11:32 AM
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 208
|
my opinion: Intel more reliable then AMD.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 11:37 AM
|
#6 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10,127
|
more intel platforms than amd available
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 11:53 AM
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,834
|
my amd got way to hot... finally caused my hd to crash
__________________
I can resist everything except temptation |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 12:00 PM
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,325
|
just avoid AMD Duron/Sempron and Celeron for intel
__________________
CHEAP US TRAFFIC 
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 12:40 PM
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: brazil
Posts: 781
|
intel has proven to be more stable for years.
amd never had that point of view, they just started, but the amd opterons (64bits) are decent, the bad things is you have much compatibilitie issues. btw, amd is cheapper enough to try 
__________________
hai2u |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 01:06 PM
|
#10 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,912
|
I use many of both... AMD is cheaper for the same performance..
Now, reliability... Dell will start offering PowerEdge server with AMD chips ...
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time .... |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#11 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 847
|
I would go with AMD. They generate less heat than intels and heat is the worst thing for any machine.
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 01:09 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 847
|
Quote:
You do know we're in 2006 and not 1999 right? |
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 06:13 PM
|
#13 |
|
So Fucking Banned
|
Fuck AMD and Intel both. Cyrix all the way, baby!
(OK, just kidding, before you all flame me). My next box will be a Xeon. I like AMD chips except for the K6-3 I had a long while ago, it caused alot of problems and I never have fully forgiven AMD for that. I will give AMD another try on a non-crtitical box. I hate Intel for lots of reasons that I am too lazy to spell out here. |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 06:25 PM
|
#14 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a Tater Patch
Posts: 2,321
|
actully amd opterons run coolers and less voltage than xeons.. though the new LV xeons give it a run for their money.....
ignore semperon and celerons at all cost unless its not a very intensive/demanding site/service
__________________
Managed Hosting - Colocation - Network Services Yellow Fiber Networks icq: 19876563 |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 07:43 PM
|
#15 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 451
|
Depends on what you're doing.
If it's just run-of-the-mill web design stuff, email, etc, then either will do you just fine. If you're doing video editing in particular, I can tell you that the Intel dual core P4s do run substantially faster than the equivalent AMD 64s. And the AMDs seem to be less forgiving about heat as well, but if you have a good CPU cooler, then either should work fine for most applications.
__________________
Gaybucks.com 100% exclusive American guys - hosted movie galleries - NATS - Boyfunk.com - Boysfeetclub.com - AJsCloset.com- SkylerDeVoss.com ICQ 272-995-402 
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,325
|
Quote:
__________________
CHEAP US TRAFFIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 08:11 PM
|
#17 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,529
|
AMD all the way. They don't have heat issue compared to their Intel equivalents. No stability issues. Many people here stuck in '99
Of course Conroe will be out in a month or 2 and things could change dramatically  Haven't seen AMD's asnswer to that yet though. Will be an interesting summer for us geeks
__________________
264-543-302 |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2006, 08:25 PM
|
#18 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a Tater Patch
Posts: 2,321
|
the amd MP chips had heat issues, the opertons use less voltage and in turn make less heat
__________________
Managed Hosting - Colocation - Network Services Yellow Fiber Networks icq: 19876563 |
|
|
|
