hehe bad shit
From Google on AdWords & Kiddie Porn Ad
Collapse
X
-
Maybe they thought no one would be stupid enough to submit a child porn site.
I agree they setup a few filters at least.Comment
-
they have filters.. i remember getting some adwords things rejected in their "sample" tool.. obviously not targetted at CP tho.Comment
-
Report this shit to all the damn US newspapers. Believe me, google will remove it.Originally posted by mpjetta
Is it just me or does the keyword sex ( http://www.google.com/search?q=sex ) still have a link to that CP shit?
Stupid automated message.Comment
-
Yip has a link to the same Kiddie Porn site.....Originally posted by mpjetta
Is it just me or does the keyword sex ( http://www.google.com/search?q=sex ) still have a link to that CP shit?
And those are little kids, babys not even close...
Those people don't give a fuck...
Ever who knows how report them to the
Newspapers, the Network news, CNN and who ever
else you can think of....Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hostingComment
-
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best xxx photos.
25 Gigs of the best, high quality
photos of young girls.
starlolita.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice there aren't any illegal words in that ad. And the link that the page went to was a blank page on a different domain that meta-refreshed to the CP site.
So even if google had filters in place banning certain words and even if they spidered the page the traffic was going to they wouldn't have caught on.
Give them a break, some of you folks act like google built that site or something.sig too bigComment
-
They really don't deserve to be given a break. The ad you mention above may have CP keywords removed - the previous ad most certainly didn't. It has been said before but as you seem to have totally missed the point raised, it would be VERY easy to filter certain keywords and this was not done. The ad may not now contain the words lolita or preteen but certainly did do and to not do such basic filtering is plain crazy.Originally posted by Lenny2
Notice there aren't any illegal words in that ad. And the link that the page went to was a blank page on a different domain that meta-refreshed to the CP site.
So even if google had filters in place banning certain words and even if they spidered the page the traffic was going to they wouldn't have caught on.
Give them a break, some of you folks act like google built that site or something.Comment
-
Fuck that. The don't deserve one. If they are making money, and they definitely are, the should be responsible enough to policy their advertising.Originally posted by Lenny2
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best xxx photos.
25 Gigs of the best, high quality
photos of young girls.
starlolita.com
Give them a break, some of you folks act like google built that site or something.Comment
-
Amazing that Google seems not to be able of detecting child porn on a website when they have developed some of the most advanced spidering technology in the world.
Google cannot use any excuses like that. They are a fucking search engine (and spider)
Originally posted by Lenny2
quote:
Notice there aren't any illegal words in that ad. And the link that the page went to was a blank page on a different domain that meta-refreshed to the CP site.
So even if google had filters in place banning certain words and even if they spidered the page the traffic was going to they wouldn't have caught on.
Give them a break, some of you folks act like google built that site or something.Comment



Comment