Quote:
Originally Posted by lyn1
To all you conspiracy crackpots. I supposed the crazed arab put the wheels down to give him a soft ride to the target. And, to all the aeronautical engineers here who reckon the scaling is wrong, what crap.
Next we will have George Bush setting up a plane crash to then get the cia to make this video then get some clot to release it to the media.
Come on guys, move-on. Admit when you got beaten or did you all think that it was a conspiracy by the teachers when you all failed elementry school and got kicked out on to the street, never to return.
Lyn from Oz - a bemused spectator of the ridiculous conspiracy theory.
|
well, you're really funny. I'm no engineer but I've a pilot brevet and was a pilot in the army, I won't explain you air dynamics and physic of flight. Just to make it easier to you, ask youself why in the movies pilots are so desperate when they lose altitude. Now try to recall a plane flight, and try to remember how a plane lands. Just in case you never took a plane, nose goes *UP*, otherwise the plane crashes. But not against a wall, it's phisically impossible when you're at ground level. Instead, the nose goes directly to the ground, so in this case the only possible ways would be:
a) the plane impacts with ITS REAR more or less at roof level
b) plane impacts against the ground with its nose, and it collapses, so the rear end would impact the building before the nose, that assuming the plane has enough speed to make a trench path. In that case, the nose would impact at least 10 ft BELOW ground level. And still the rear part would hit the building first.
Now another thing that surprised me after writing the first post: we're talking about the Pentagon, with prolly the highest security levels in the world. Possibly more than the White House itself. We're talking thousands of cameras inside and outside the building. We're talking satellite surveillance. We're talking radars. Air surveillance. The whole package. And the only recording of this plane crashing is a sequential camera from a gas station or parking?
Now take a look at the "video" itself. You've at least 5 frames. So the sequential camera must be shooting frames at 1000 fr per second (i'm exaggerating, but some really outrageous speed) when a cinema camera shoots at 32 frames per second. Now take a look at the building. Try to see very carefully how it looks before the crashing. then take a look at the last frame. Flames and smoke dissipated almost magically, but enough to see the building is there, the roof line is intact and so on. If you saw a pic of the effects of Pentagon crasing on 9-11, you'll remember that wasn't what happened. Not even close.
So again, dunno if there was a conspiracy or not, but this video is fake. And a really really bad fake, it doesn't resists any analysis, and I'm not expert
