What if we paid for .kids? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#1

What if we paid for .kids?

05-10-2006, 01:26 PM

What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.

Alea iacta est
Tags: None
Fresh

TubeClicks.com - First Tube Affiliate Program

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 4920
Share

Post
#2

05-10-2006, 01:29 PM

i disagree. I dont think we need to start a non profit anything to prove anything. Keep in mind the adult industry is the victim.

Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390
Comment
milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#3

05-10-2006, 01:37 PM

Originally posted by Dave Guru

i disagree. I dont think we need to start a non profit anything to prove anything. Keep in mind the adult industry is the victim.

We saturate the internet with free porn, barely lift our finger to protect the children from it and we are the victim?

Alea iacta est
Comment
Fresh

TubeClicks.com - First Tube Affiliate Program

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 4920
Share

Post
#4

05-10-2006, 02:09 PM

Originally posted by milambur

We saturate the internet with free porn, barely lift our finger to protect the children from it and we are the victim?

stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.

Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390
Comment
milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#5

05-10-2006, 02:23 PM

Originally posted by Dave Guru

stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.

It's not about parenting, it about taking responsiblity for products that are harmful too children. We need to help the parents with the tools to protect children from our sites.

Alea iacta est
Comment
L0rdJuni0r

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 5883
Share

Post
#6

05-10-2006, 02:28 PM

Originally posted by Dave Guru

stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.

i agree with you 100%

Affordable video and picture editing.
junior[at]jampackproductions[DOT]com
ICQ: 605429331
Comment
=^..^=

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 6935
Share

Post
#7

05-10-2006, 02:30 PM

becauase if started a .KIDS then the pedos would have INSTANT AUDIENCE!!!!
makes it to easy for the sickos

#RememberYourRoots #AaronMForGFYHOF
Comment
Major (Tom)

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 32492
Share

Post
#8

05-10-2006, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by milambur

What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.

I think its a good idea.
maybe if the asacp were more proactive with ideas like this, instead of wanting 10 dollar kick backs per domain on .xxx we'd have a .kids already and we could let the little children of the world surf a safe web.

Duke
Comment
Big John

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 470
Share

Post
#9

05-10-2006, 02:32 PM

Are you serious? You haven't thought this through have you? Can you seriously, for even one second, believe that porn producers would be allowed to manage children's Internet surfing?

Once the press have finished rolling about on the floor laughing they'd have a field day.

As was said - try to stay focused.
Comment
NoCarrier

We need more free porn

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 16356
Share

Post
#10

05-10-2006, 02:34 PM

WE?!?!?

Who is "WE"?!

There is no industry coalition. Internet porn is all about individuals who think they are a big family because they have parties at conventions with naked chicks humiliated in front of fat webmasters taking pictures of them like savages.
Comment
FetishWeb

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 390
Share

Post
#11

05-10-2006, 02:37 PM

Originally posted by milambur

What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.

Surely, a pornographer backed .KIDS extention will attract no heat from religious nut jobs, the average idiot, the republican party, and the Bush administration.
Comment
milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#12

05-10-2006, 02:41 PM

[QUOTEhahahaha^..^=]becauase if started a .KIDS then the pedos would have INSTANT AUDIENCE!!!!
makes it to easy for the sickos[/QUOTE]
I disagree, if implemented right it would be easier to enforce. As an example you could require stricter rules and monitoring for chat sites on tld lvl.

Alea iacta est
Comment
Fresh

TubeClicks.com - First Tube Affiliate Program

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 4920
Share

Post
#13

05-10-2006, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by milambur

It's not about parenting, it about taking responsiblity for products that are harmful too children. We need to help the parents with the tools to protect children from our sites.

wow dude, you should work for ASACP or something. Im not trying to be a dick about it or anything but i know my role and i play my role to the best of my abilities. Parents should play their roles and do what they need to do to make sure their children are not exposed to porn. Like, maybe, WATCHING them for a fucking change. Just like they should not be exposed to alcohol or drugs. Same concept. It's Netnannys, Surfwatchs, Cybersitters, Cyberpatrols role make sure kids are not exposed. If i worked for one of those companies, I would be all about protecting the kids, but thats not my role.

I dunno, maybe one day when ive made enough money to focus on something that dosnt make me any money, protecting other peoples children may be a possibility. Till then, my focus is on what my role is.

and just for the record, I have 3 nephews and 1 niece that i visit on a day to day basis.

Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390
Comment
milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#14

05-10-2006, 02:49 PM

Originally posted by Big John

Are you serious? You haven't thought this through have you? Can you seriously, for even one second, believe that porn producers would be allowed to manage children's Internet surfing?

I didn't say porn producers should manage children's Internet surfing.

Originally posted by FetishWeb

Surely, a pornographer backed .KIDS extention will attract no heat from religious nut jobs, the average idiot, the republican party, and the Bush administration.

Doing something to address the concerns these groups have would undermine their attempts to rid the internet of porn.

Alea iacta est
Comment
FetishWeb

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 390
Share

Post
#15

05-10-2006, 02:53 PM

Originally posted by milambur

Doing something to address the concerns these groups have would undermine their attempts to rid the internet of porn.

It would only strengthen their accusation that pornographers want to victimize kids. Possibly to the point where sane people might start agreeing with them.
Comment
milambur

Mainstream since 2010

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1327
Share

Post
#16

05-10-2006, 03:56 PM

Originally posted by FetishWeb

It would only strengthen their accusation that pornographers want to victimize kids. Possibly to the point where sane people might start agreeing with them.

Isn't it they who say the children are victims of easy accessible porn? And I think they are right. The only question is what to do about it. Since blacklisting don't work isn't whitelisting the only viable metod?

I think alot of people would be very glad to see the adult entertainment industry taking steps to protect children from porn.

Alea iacta est
Comment
Alex

So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 10963
Share

Post
#17

05-10-2006, 04:00 PM

Originally posted by NoCarrier

WE?!?!?

Who is "WE"?!

There is no industry coalition. Internet porn is all about individuals who think they are a big family because they have parties at conventions with naked chicks humiliated in front of fat webmasters taking pictures of them like savages.

I like you.

Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...