![]() |
An item is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
If that happens to be zero, then unfortunatly for the owner or producer of the item; thats all that person is willing to offer, if you don't like the idea of zero then they'll chose an alternative or steal it. *I think*, people paying for porn, music, etc, there needs to be more flexibility. Although logically a system that sells content at a price everyone is happy to part with is probley impossible to implement. Example, Maybe potential customer A is willing to pay $25 a month for access, fine sold. Maybe potential customer B is willing to pay $1 a month for access. Your better off getting that $1 a month off B because anything more he's just going to go steal it or look else where. Basic economic concept, it's not flawless because of many factors but bleh, would be nice if we could all charge what people are willing to pay. |
Quote:
ok, I can't explain it simpler than that :1orglaugh :upsidedow |
CDs for music suck ass, I won't even bother with CDs anymore. To me they are old pos technology. In this day n age my music is listened via my computer and mp3 player. Which can connect to any stereo in the house, and even my truck.
So, If I'm listening to my music via mp3 - on all my media centers (computer/handheld/home & car stereo). Why am I going to buy the CD just to bring it home, rip it to my comp, then throw away the CD? Or, purchase a devilishly encoded media file of iTunes that throws a shit fit if I try to transfer it. The moral of the story is, no one listens to CDs anymore. Fuck if I'm people will pay for something they don't need. If there was an iTunes type service that allowed users to download unlocked mp3 format music. It would most certainly be in massive use (even if it required payment).. |
There are very intelligent people at GFY. This thread makes me smile and have hope.
|
btw.. Just want to say. I do have an iTunes account and use it all the time. As 98% of the my music played is from my desktop. But it's an extreme pita if I want to make the music mobile and bring it with me. So it's not my "main source" for music.
|
Quote:
|
Any band that signs a label these days is a total idiot.
|
Quote:
I am saying this: A person who NEVER planned to buy your product DOES NOT do you economical damage by NOT purchasing your product. |
Quote:
I am in a band, and I am also a producer of music. One thing I know is that the reason I ever got involved in either one of those things was the fucking love for it. That is why I don't mind anyone downloading and listening to our songs off soulseek or something. All our releases are on vinyl anyway, so anybody who has actually taken the time to rip our music off vinyl, well good for them. Now what I do have a HUGE fucking problem with are cocksuckers like http://www.last.fm/ who are cataloguing every band, be it mainstream or underground, listing their songs and upselling the full albums to people. And guess what...the bands don't get fucking SHIT. How is this shit legal? Or am I completely wrong about them? |
Quote:
|
50.........
|
Quote:
Big labels can be evil, but they can also be a big help. A band has to decide: would they rather get screwed by a record label and not make much of CD sales but sell out tours and make money on publishing and radio play and play in front of 3,000 people a night, or would they rather play in front of 300 people a night and make $4 a CD? either way can work for you, but if you have aspirations of being a big band you need the power that a major label can provide. |
amen!
make those fuckers pay! |
Quote:
While this may be true for tanglible items, like food, it's bullshit when you come to something like music. Pretend you're a band. You have a CD. The CD is on the internet. I would NEVER buy your music, because I don't buy music. I download your CD. You HAVE NOT LOST any money. Now while that is illegal, I can only say again: Someone who WAS NEVER GOING TO BE a customer CANNOT cause you financial loss. |
An oldie but goodie: 2hp |
Quote:
I will say this though. I think smaller, lesser known bands can benefit by allowing songs and CD's to be downloaded for free this way people can check them out without any risk. |
This is bullshit, noone buys CD's anymore cause they're shit, only a couple of tracks on it are ever good and noone is going to pay money for shit. Downloading MP3s however gives people instant access to the band's music and those people are the ones who end up going to the band's concerts and coughing up $$$ to support their favourite band... Fuck greedy record companies, considering how much money they make and how little they pass onto the actual bands its easy to see why the fight so hard to "ban downloading"... fuckin stingy crooks!
|
Quote:
If you download the CD and listen to it... NO, I can't subtract that from my existing sales... BUT.. I did NOT make money from that you are listening to what I produced. Just because its music, movies or whatever does not mean you are not using it. Its the USAGE/LICENSE you have to pay for. As I try to point out: I'm not losing money, but I am not earning EITHER if its stolen. I won't argue more about this. Its just plain stupid that you say you won't buy it (i.e. no sale) but you will use it... try jumping over the fence to a concert, get caught, and explain them when you get caught; -it was not my intention to get in, but now I'm here you haven't lost any money :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup |
Quote:
But seriously -- the "major label" model is going nowhere but down. Bands don't bother to produce more than one MAYBE two good songs on an album, and then the labels have the fucking balls to rape consumers on the price, adding very little value, versus an electronic distribution. THEN, like the dinosaurs they are, they fight any form of online distribution -- even iTunes and other legal licensing services! Maybe there's a little pain right now, but the labels definitely aren't helping themselves by suing customers instead of offering licensing methods that make sense, fighting change rather than embracing alternative revenue streams, and shoving crap down our throat instead of cultivating quality collections of music. I'm against stealing -- you should pay for what you use -- but I think the labels should wake up and smell the Internet. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If someone who cannot afford to buy music wants to own music they can either get it for free from legal sources or they can make music themsleves. Or, horror of horrors, they can get up off their backside and earn money to buy the things they want. |
It's no different than someone hacking your sites and posting passwords to your site all over the internet.
Of course it is,, thats my biz. music is not. :P |
same thing happened to me -
someone hired me to produce music for their project - they were very happy with the song, they used the song and gave me credit on the reel. they never paid me for the song. its all good cause karma can be a mohterfucker. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123