GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   .XXX is back and ICANN is looking for public comments (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=603228)

polish_aristocrat 04-30-2006 03:18 AM

:winkwink:
Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions
Anyone know when the new TLD will be released once it gets approved (assuming it gets approved)?

we should outsource sending anti-xxx emails to icann from different email adresses and IP's to you, in that case .xxx will never get approved

2HousePlague 04-30-2006 03:19 AM

http://images.art.com/images/-/Einst...C10381259.jpeg



2hp

vantage 04-30-2006 06:22 AM

mail send!

Why 04-30-2006 09:13 AM

if the powers that be want it. there is no amount of emails from pornographers that is going to change anything.

sickbeatz 04-30-2006 09:21 AM

If the .xxx law is passed, I'm going to hire an army of mercs to slowly torture kill every child that belongs to anybody who has any tie of responsibility to the whole `.xxx' proposal.

sickbeatz 04-30-2006 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sickbeatz
If the .xxx law is passed, I'm going to hire an army of mercs to slowly torture kill every child that belongs to anybody who has any tie of responsibility to the whole `.xxx' proposal.

These mercs are currently in standby mode somewhere in the Dominican Republic. If you would like to contribute, hit me up on ICQ :1orglaugh

u-Bob 04-30-2006 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep

:1orglaugh

polish_aristocrat 04-30-2006 12:34 PM

.kids Is Not The Answer
 
unfortunately I agree with that guy and as I said somewhere before, I see no real justification for a .kids domain.

I'd encourage everyone to oppose .xxx but IMO encouraging .kids is not the best solution.

So please send your anti-.xxx emails to ICANN and explain arguments against that extension, preferably without encouraging .kids at the same time.
Especially since it looks not natural when everyone opposing .XXX suggests. KIDS.

The web is working fine now, no need for .xxx, no need for kids either. :2 cents:

Just my opinion. :2 cents:
Quote:

I note that a few posters have suggested the idea of .kids solving the issue, I just don't see this. That would mean that millions of websites would be forced to buy a .kid domain name including many non- commercial sites such as school sites and research sites. You would be forcing these sites to spend money. The .XXX method only forces sites that are commercial and money making to spend money, therefore this is the fairest method.

Also, can you imagine all those kids accepting that they can only browse .kid domains, its just not workable. XXX is merely a classification such as in the movie business with films and nobody objects to that.


Regards





Robert Smith

Dirty Dane 04-30-2006 12:59 PM

bump
email sent :thumbsup

leggs 04-30-2006 02:20 PM

I posted my 10 reasons why I figure Internet porn will eventually die!

http://theukhardcore.com

Ultimately....
The Internet is going to become a place for bible thumpers.

potter 04-30-2006 02:57 PM

50 bastards trying to control the internet

polish_aristocrat 04-30-2006 03:25 PM

I like this guy ;)

Quote:

I have installed a free software on my childrens computer that filter away most of the websites containing adult material. This takes no time and is working very fine, and it could work with .xxx. We were some parents discussing this with a technical expert from our local school, and there is one major problem with .xxx:

If you move/force "legit" adult sites into .xxx , it will only create new problems! And that is all the non-US controlled domains and IPs instead of domains, etc, that will take advantage of this and exploit the search engines and create more spam. Many of these sites get around the filter, but today they are listed lower than the websites that are easier to filter, so its a very bad idea to give these websites this advantage and motive to expand. Not only will the "easy-filtering" websites and emails dissappear, but it will also create a huge amount of spam because their marketing methods will change in amount and design.

Honestly, if protecting children is the goal, then .xxx is short thinking and not the answer! The problem is not the legit adult sites, but too many parents do not have the technical knowledge to install a simple thing as a software. Instead of spending time and money on something that will only create new problems for us responsible parents and the schools, the government should spend more time and money on teaching parents and schools how to protect their children. And maybe cooperate with the legit part of the adult business, instead of trying to control which is impossible globally. That is the only way!


We urge you to say NO to .xxx .


Regards
Mikke
and no, this one isnt my fake identity :thumbsup

BluMedia 04-30-2006 05:47 PM

Bump for the ones who haven't sent their comments to ICANN.

Mark

Compdoctor 04-30-2006 07:13 PM

Done

Hello, and thank you for your message.

You have sent a message to an email address that is automatically processed.
In order to further process your message we need to verify that it came from
a real email address. To confirm your message, you can either:

1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line
The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note
that this method is *not* foolproof.

or

2) Visit the URL
<http://confirm.icann.org/?s=97172ef79bd42505&[email protected]>

If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps
above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once.

For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was:

"XXX. Domains a Bad Idea"

and it arrived at approximately Sun Apr 30 18:51:42 2006.

Thank you for your message.

polish_aristocrat 05-01-2006 04:24 AM

bump

and before sending comments to ICANN, read also post no 48 re .kids

althoguh I know that you can have a different opinion than me re .kids :)

Za Ha 05-01-2006 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
from another thread, posted by milambur

Worst case scenario:
They start the .xxx tld up. American legislators decide to limit adult content to the xxx tld. Domains on tlds controlled by the US (.com, .net, .org, .info, .biz, .us) besides the .xxx tld needs to remove all adult content. The government decides all those visiting the .xxx tld need to be verified adults. Implementation becomes a nightmare and it requires surfers to verify they are 18 in order for the ISPs to allow them to visit .xxx domains. Search engines ban all adult content in their results. Surfers think it?s too much work to be able to get access to a porn site, they start up torrent and download all the porn they?ll ever need.

Well in that case, money will be made in torrents, and everyone with a porn site will use torrents to make $

FetishWeb 05-01-2006 12:35 PM

All the average idiot webmaster has to do is take a look at how heavily gamed and abused the .EU registration process was.

As far as a landrush for .XXX - multiply it by about 1000 times worse.

If this happens you can expect to pay $xx,xxx for just about anything once they get snapped up - even shitty names that would cost you $xx-xxx for a .COM equivlant.

polish_aristocrat 05-02-2006 09:07 AM

:thumbsup

FetishWeb 05-02-2006 09:43 AM

On another point, its highly unlikely "private" registrations will be allowed in the .XXX space.

polish_aristocrat 05-03-2006 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishWeb
On another point, its highly unlikely "private" registrations will be allowed in the .XXX space.

i agree....

Hymes 05-03-2006 08:18 AM

Just to add my two about .KIDS, it's not necessary to bring it up if you send a letter to ICANN about .XXX. We at FSC do it regularly because we like to offer rational alternatives to irrational ideas. Right now only .XXX is on the table.

But even the ICANN staff had to admit that .KIDS makes more sense than .XXX, even if only for young children.

I had a very long chat in Wellington with an ICANN Board member personally responsible for the technical evaluation of all STLDs, who told me that .XXX will not protect minors from seeing adult content, and readily agreed that .KIDS had similar hurdles but made much more sense.

I thought that was interesting. Even people on the ICANN Board know .XXX will not work.

Send a letter of opposition. No matter what happens, you won't regret it.

FightThisPatent 05-03-2006 10:13 AM

email your grammatically correct viewpoints on .XXX to:
[email protected]

ICANN will be meeting shortly to followup on their last session about .XXX

Two years ago, the public showing from the adult community was seriously lacking.. 2 years later, this .XXX thing is still going, and if the final hours expression of rejection for .XXX aren't put in, then if .XXX gets approved, you can't blame the people in adult who supported and wanted .XXX, you'll have to blame yourself for not standing up.


Fight the apathy!

polish_aristocrat 05-05-2006 06:10 AM

:thumbsup

Redrob 05-06-2006 12:27 AM

Take a moment and send a letter. Do something positive to affect your own future.

XXX and loss of net neutrality will be big problems IMHO.

edgeprod 05-06-2006 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davethetruth
Hello, and thank you for your message.

You have sent a message to an email address that is automatically processed.
In order to further process your message we need to verify that it came from
a real email address. To confirm your message, you can either:

1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line
The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note
that this method is *not* foolproof.

2) Visit the URL
<http://
If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps
above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once.

For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was:

".XXX is a bad idea..."

and it arrived at approximately Fri Apr 28 14:35:57 2006.

Thank you for your message.

Holy shit, that's fucking weird... I had the same subject, minus the "..." --- lol!


Hello, and thank you for your message.

You have sent a message to an email address that is automatically processed.
In order to further process your message we need to verify that it came from
a real email address. To confirm your message, you can either:

1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line
The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note
that this method is *not* foolproof.

or

2) Visit the URL
<http://confirm.icann.org/?s=a253abf7ef563d6e&[email protected]>

If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps
above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once.

For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was:

".XXX is a bad idea"

and it arrived at approximately Sat May 6 00:34:22 2006.

Thank you for your message.

davecummings 05-07-2006 09:23 AM

Bump--please email [email protected] NOW!!!!

Dave

MikeHawk 05-07-2006 11:20 AM

bUmP
:warning :warning :warning

RogerV5 05-07-2006 07:22 PM

icann is headed in the right direction

polish_aristocrat 05-08-2006 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerV5
icann is headed in the right direction

:disgust :disgust

polish_aristocrat 05-09-2006 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeHawk
bUmP
:warning :warning :warning

:upsidedow :upsidedow

reynold 05-09-2006 04:58 AM

I hope things would turn out good this time.

Malicious Biz 05-09-2006 05:16 AM

bump the .xxx


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123