GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who supports GW Bush? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=602925)

Drake 04-28-2006 11:08 AM

As far as the war goes, nobody knows how wars are going to turn out and mistakes are inevitable. Especially in an area where religion and ethnic fueds are so ubiquotous. If any other President had gone into Iraq, we'd be in this mess just the same.

madawgz 04-28-2006 11:11 AM

i support him 100%, i love to bomb the shit out of everyone!!



















..mmmmmmmm not

GoodChris 04-28-2006 11:13 AM

War? What war? All I saw was a unilateral invasion of a Country that was not posing any direct threat.

How much is gas again today?

stickyfingerz 04-28-2006 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Shittyfingerzdotnet does blindly :thumbsup

http://www.webdejob.com/images/stick...s/dscn2313.jpg

Notice the unique look of intelligence ... :1orglaugh

Haha I love that pic. Yes of course I do. I dont blindly support him. I support him knowing the facts. I dont put conspiracy theories under my "facts" category though unlike you. Reagan got this same kind of bad press, but back then we didnt have 24 hour news and the internet to spread alot of half truths and lies about him. So let me ask you.. If Reagan was in office today do you think his polls would be higher or lower? :winkwink: Now let me remind you that in a nationwide vote just over a year ago Reagan was voted as the best President EVER! Im sure you will have some conspiracy or reasoning why a nationwide phone vote that only allowed each phone number to vote one time would show Reagan as the best right.... :uhoh

stickyfingerz 04-28-2006 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
You're clueless :2 cents:

Iraq, right now, is on the brink of civil war, a civil war which would lead not to a lasting, pro-western democracy, but to a whole new breeding ground for international terrorism. The Iraq invasion could have gone much better, had the administration listened to the Pentagon, sent enough troops to ensure stability, not fired the entire Iraqi army (releasing 300000 armed, trained, unemployed, bitter men onto the streets), etc.

Right now, though, the situation is fucked up, and a sectarian civil war is likely, if not utterly inevitable. This is because of tons of BIG FUCKING MISTAKES, which are not just pointed out by pacifist hippie pinko commies, but by American generals and security officials.

But I guess you watch Fox News a lot...

Guess thats why we are now saying troop withdrawl has been moved up ahead of what was thought before huh? :uhoh

Theo 04-28-2006 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidScripting
such as Iran and N. Korea

seems like they need some 'help'

:wink


I had canada and australia in mind :error

directfiesta 04-28-2006 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Haha I love that pic. Yes of course I do. I dont blindly support him. I support him knowing the facts. I dont put conspiracy theories under my "facts" category though unlike you. Reagan got this same kind of bad press, but back then we didnt have 24 hour news and the internet to spread alot of half truths and lies about him. So let me ask you.. If Reagan was in office today do you think his polls would be higher or lower? :winkwink: Now let me remind you that in a nationwide vote just over a year ago Reagan was voted as the best President EVER! Im sure you will have some conspiracy or reasoning why a nationwide phone vote that only allowed each phone number to vote one time would show Reagan as the best right.... :uhoh

Topic: Bush .... not Reagan and not Clinton ... try to focus :upsidedow

directfiesta 04-28-2006 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downtime
Badly executed invasion? Sorry I don't think the Iraq invasion could have gone any better than he orchestrated it. The middle east is the biggest threat to US security on the planet; securing a democracy in Iraq will make it safer for the United States in the long run.


Quote:

George, get off that stupid porno forum ....
Laura.


987654

GatorB 04-28-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
I support him because the alternative is worse. He does about half of what I want. However, please tell me which democrat you'd think would do better.

See that's the problem today idiot like you who think it has to be one or the other. It's like "Oh I won't vote the guy I want I'll vote for the guy who'll fuck up the least" WTF kind of decision is that? That's like saying because you don't like the Grren Bay Packers you have to be a Bears fan. Um no there are 30 other teams out there, pick one. Same type thing.

Since your a republican go to http://www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml and check out what their beliefs are and tell me that not more in line with what you believe than the so call republcian party of today. Until idiots on both sides stop choosing retards because they are afraid of the other side winning ( and really there is getting to be very little difference between the two. They both cater to the lobbyists that give them the most $$$ ) things will only get worse.

Radical Nathan 04-28-2006 01:16 PM

i think anyone who supports dubya ought to take a look here:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3lReq...Fascism%20bush

European Lee 04-28-2006 02:10 PM

51 :thumbsup

Regards,

Lee

FreeFastHost 04-28-2006 02:22 PM

I don't mind Bush, there's definitely someone that could do better though. Either way he's better than Kerry would've been.

Kevin - The PNN 04-28-2006 03:11 PM

I vote mostly republican, and LOVE BUSH, but not a President Bush fan.

aico 04-28-2006 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downtime
Badly executed invasion? Sorry I don't think the Iraq invasion could have gone any better than he orchestrated it. The middle east is the biggest threat to US security on the planet; securing a democracy in Iraq will make it safer for the United States in the long run.

I know about 7 military Generals who say you're wrong, and I do believe they know a little more about it then you.

mrthumbs 04-28-2006 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreeFastHost
I don't mind Bush, there's definitely someone that could do better though. Either way he's better than Kerry would've been.


Bush is no good but i have to agree with you on that one.

12clicks 04-30-2006 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
See that's the problem today idiot like you who think it has to be one or the other.

dear uneducated halfwit, on election day, you could vote for Bush, Kerry, or some nobody who's completely unqualified.
stop pretending you have a clue

12clicks 04-30-2006 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radical Nathan
i think anyone who supports dubya ought to take a look here:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3lReq...Fascism%20bush

you're either 7, a european, or both.:1orglaugh

Malicious Biz 04-30-2006 08:15 AM

Being A <political Affiliation Here> Is Better Than Being A <other Political Affiliation Here>

Choppa 04-30-2006 08:18 AM

fuck bush ive seen more himalayan yaks with better speaking skills :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :pimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123