Saadam Did Have Weapons Of Mass Descruction (proof inside)

[mahoney]

I don't think most Americans will ever believe this until the Weapons are actually found but I think this interview with Saddam General Georges Sada On The Daily Show is pretty convincing. I believe there is video on here too


JON STEWART, HOST: Then, is the battle between our two countries, was it drummed up between Saddam and his interests to dominate the Arab world and our interests to have stability? Was it inevitable? Is it something that came through misunderstandings of culture?

GENERAL GEORGES SADA: Well let me tell you, it was not misunderstanding between the cultures, but t was the Saddam intentions and Saddam wanted to rule that part of the world. He was always going to go for weapons and of course he had weapons of mass destruction that he had managed to hide and to mislead the United Nations countries.

STEWART: This is obviously the most controversial part of the book. In it you say that right before the invasion of Iraq Saddam had his weapons of mass destruction taken to Syria.

SADA: That?s true. He had them there before Americans came and liberated the country. The weapons were transported to Syria by air and by ground.

STEWART: That would seemingly get the Bush administration off the giant hook that it appears to be on. Why wouldn?t they pursue that line of evidence? Or have they? It seems like for us it would be hard to understand that that really happened. Given that the whole world was looking for those.

SADA: I am sure in the coming days the authorities are going to tell the public and tell all Americans after they will have all the evidence in their hands and they can verify everything to the Americans.

STEWART: You still feel, now this is first-hand knowledge of yours? Somebody told you this? You?ve seen it in documents? You?ve seen it on video.

SADA: Oh yes, the weapons of mass destruction I have seen them myself because you see I was the number two man in the air force. Then I know how they were used against our nation. Of course?
STEWART: But in the later ?90s after they thought they had rid them of it, you still saw them.

SADA: After the ?90s they were there. How I knew they were there, after they were transported the pilots who transported they told me.

STEWART: The guys that flew them ?

SADA: The guys who were responsible.

STEWART: How do you fly a weapon? Isn?t that a large thing or do you put it?.

SADA: No. They are raw materials; some of them are like barrels, yellow barrels, of course, with skulls and cross bones on them.

STEWART: You think if you?re going to hide that stuff you think you might paint something like you know, spam.

[laughter]

STEWART: In your mind this will all come out. We will learn that there are weapons of mass destruction. You can understand how it?s hard for us to be a little bit skeptical but I like you.

[uno]

I was at that interview, live. Guy seemed like he was trying to sell his book imo.

[Linkster]

The US would know if there was any - we sold it to them in the first place in the 80s - so we have a complete list of what they should have had and whats been accounted for - simple math

[mahoney]

Originally Posted by uno

I was at that interview, live. Guy seemed like he was trying to sell his book imo.

That's easy to say but it wouldn't suprise me at all if Bush's intelligence was on the money even though he couldn't prove it. Saadam would have complied with USA investigations if he had nothing to hide. Saadam was an evil bastard and Im glad he's gone.

[mahoney]

Originally Posted by Linkster

The US would know if there was any - we sold it to them in the first place in the 80s - so we have a complete list of what they should have had and whats been accounted for - simple math

LOL you think the usa sold Saadam Weapons of Mass Destruction?
That is re-cock-ulous

[white-rob-like-whoa]

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHa

[CyberHustler]

Originally Posted by mahoney

LOL you think the usa sold Saadam Weapons of Mass Destruction?
That is re-cock-ulous

not really all that redicilous

[messiah1]

AMERICA DUPLICITOUS IN DEBATE OVER IRAQ'S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Perhaps we should look at the source of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction, that are being mentioned on a daily basis as justification for an invasion of Iraq to make it an oilman's colony of the USA.

The fact is, the USA and Britain sold Saddam Hussein the technology and materials Iraq needed to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.

Reports by the US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs -- which oversees American exports policy -- reveal that the US, under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, sold materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene. Britain sold Iraq the drug pralidoxine, an antidote to nerve gas, in March 1992, after the end of the Gulf war. Pralidoxine can be reverse engineered to create nerve gas.

The Senate committee's reports on 'US Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual-Use Exports to Iraq', undertaken in 1992 in the wake of the Gulf war, give the date and destination of all US exports. The reports show, for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches of bacillus anthracis -- the micro-organism that causes anthrax -- were shipped to the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education, along with two batches of the bacterium clostridium botulinum, the agent that causes deadly botulism poisoning.

http://www.ahherald.com/readers_writ...aq_weapons.htm

more sources:
http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=241
http://www.sundayherald.com/27572

[mahoney]

BULLSHIT Sounds like spin to me

[xclusive]

Originally Posted by mahoney

BULLSHIT Sounds like spin to me

Nope Iraq was our friend in the 80's and we gave them all sorts of stuff

[directfiesta]

Ship them to Syria before the invasion ...

Yep, if I know I am going to get home invaded, I will make sure to send my guns and knives over to my neighboor...

Makes sense after all

<insert tinfoilhat.jpeg >

[Matt 26z]

We were allies with Saddam in the mid-80's when they were at war with Iran. Plus Russia was in the region.

Weapons were in fact given to Saddam by the US at that time.

[Vasago Reno]

Doesn't matter which side you're on, all world leaders lie and cover up the truth from the public.

We'll never know the full truth either way.

[sfera]

well not a surprise here

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by sfera

well not a surprise here

and pretty convicing evidence .....

[leggs]

Blah blah blah....
Only one thing is a weapon of mass destruction...
George Bush.

Seriously, W.M.D are nuclear! Biological, chemical and anything else are NOT W.M.Ds

In order to have nukes they would need a nuclear plant and be enriching uranium or have someone sell it to them. Not to mention the fact they would still require a delivery system.

And to the best of my knowledge, there has never been an alogation against Iraq for having nuclear warheads. Therefore, it's a crock of bullshit used to subvert the general public.

[Linkster]

Originally Posted by mahoney

LOL you think the usa sold Saadam Weapons of Mass Destruction?
That is re-cock-ulous

You might wanna check your history books - we supported Saddam all through his war with Iran - believe it or not we even supported Osama Bin Laden at the same time with his fighters helping them - dont think for a second we didnt know exactly what he had.

You might also be surprised to find out that early in the 80s we (at the time Henry Kissinger was our leading statesman) were negotiating with IRAN - to sell them nuclear power plants and enrichment technology with contracts with GE

[Downtime]

I saw that episode not too long ago when it aired, i'd like to read the guy's book.

[TheLegacy]

so syria has weapons of mass destruction !!!!

Lets attack them NOW

[Juilan]

Russian Newspapers and radio have reported for years that when Saddam invaded Kuwait he found nuclear missles the US was hiding there during the Reagan/Bush years in the face of disarmament treaty violations. Then came the first US invasion of Iraq by Bush sr. and the Russian media have always maintained it was to recover those stolen US weapons of mass destruction taken back to Iraq. You can't believe everything in Pravda but have always wondered if there was any grain of truth to this...

[nico-t]

Originally Posted by mahoney

STEWART: How do you fly a weapon? Isn?t that a large thing or do you put it?.

SADA: No. They are raw materials; some of them are like barrels, yellow barrels, of course, with skulls and cross bones on them.

hes right i see that all the time in comics

[mahoney]

Originally Posted by Linkster

You might wanna check your history books - we supported Saddam all through his war with Iran - believe it or not we even supported Osama Bin Laden at the same time with his fighters helping them - dont think for a second we didnt know exactly what he had.

You might also be surprised to find out that early in the 80s we (at the time Henry Kissinger was our leading statesman) were negotiating with IRAN - to sell them nuclear power plants and enrichment technology with contracts with GE

Wow, someone should make a movie about this. Talk about fucking conspiracy
therory. What was in it for the usa to do such a thing? Did they just make the mistake of thinking these were good people that could be trusted? Did they need the money that bad? On another note did anyone see that movie with Nicholas Cage that plays an Arms dealer in the middle east? Sounds like it ties into the olot of that movie speaking of movies