USA is a country full of really really stupid people, and im not saying everyone im just saying theres a good quota. I know for sure if I had a leader like that I would be out in the streets protesting every single day.

Step 1: President gets a blowjob from an intern

Isnt it like 3 families that run the country? I dont know much but I did here about the last 2 presidents

This might be the stupidest comment. I don't remember having a terrorist problem here in the states like we have now and over the past few years. I haven't seen our country in such a mess in a long time. Bush is evil and if your answer is evil. Starting wars and blowing people up is far from the right answer.

:thumbsup :thumbsup

This is what I'm talking. There are so many stupid lazy Americans that think they can't make a difference. But if everyone did try and do something, it would be interesting to see what happens.

Its like the idiots that say I won't ever win the lotto and so they never play. You can't win if you don't play. You just gotta go for it even if the odds are against you.

Our president is so bad for America. The rest of the world starts to associate Americans as shit because of our leaders. Everyone's gotta try to do something, anything ... just don't sit on your ass.

You can do it! :1orglaugh

Maybe Monica will come back so GW can get impeached like Clinton. Too late for the process though...

Nice way to include absence of proof and further weaken your argument.

thank you Bama for actually answering the question. Now I don't have to bother doing it.

In answer to your question. The only thing that an individual can do is to put pressure on their individual Congressman as it is the house and only the house that can vote to impeach. They of course cannot vote to impeach unless they have a legal basis for concluding that the President has violated American law (high crime) or has committed Treason.

A President cannot be impeached because he is not a popular President.

Newsflash to the sheeple:

The President is not actually running the country. The prez is just a frontman.

Got it? Good :thumbsup

Strong words to attach to your signature when I'm sure you're trying to get business from US webmasters.

The first thing you need is a "high crime and misdemeanor."

Simply not liking GWB's policies does not quality.

When you find this, you will be the hero of the Looney Left. They have been looking for years..

I'm just curious how the war in Iraq is protecting us. Have any Iraqi terrorists even tried to enter the USA? Did Sadaam have any ties with terrorists that threatened the USA?

What was the exact threat that Iraq posed to the USA?

I do know that Iran would not be trying to develop nukes if the Iraqi army was still next door.

How about the phone tapping. That is illegal. What about the lies and coverups? There are high crimes he has commited, he just hasn't been charged and convicted yet.

You are so correct. :thumbsup :thumbsup

It has not been determined that the "phone tapping" is illegal and the subject has been and is still being debated, but the consensus thus far, among constitutional legal scholars, appears to be that the President not only has the power via the Constitution, but the obligation to carry out "phone tapping". In addition the consensus appears to be that the Congress cannot enact a law that places limits on the power that is provided to the President via the Constitution unless the Supreme Court agrees that the law passed by the Congress is legally binding upon the President.

You saying that "there are high crimes he has committed" does not make it so and unless you are a constitutional scholar your statement does not bear any credibility.

Tapping foreign terrorists' phone lines is not illegal.

Are you saying that all these foreign terrorists have to do is call the good ole' USA --and then they are suddenly immune?

CUCKOO, CUCKOO.

BRAVO King Adam, that's the spirit

Democratic countries generally don't produce terrorism. Make Iraq democratic, and it stabilizes the Mideast. That's the theory. However, it doesn't happen overnight.

GWB said Saddam had terrorist ties.

Saddam himself was a terrorist. He ruled his own country with fear, intimidation, and outright brutality. He used chemical weapons against civilians in Halabja in 1988.

An Iraqi general, Georges Sada, said that WMD were shipped to Syria.

This has got to be, without a doubt, the most absurd post I've ever seen on a message board. This takes the absolute cake...I honestly don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Here's a tip - ask people to put an "impeach bush" link on the bottom of their tgp galleries. The notion that you and/or any combination of these fuckers can in some way encourage an impeachment of the sitting president is just fucked...it's not just fucked, it's downright coke induced, self aggrandizing, deluded bizarre.

You are one stupid fucking human being.

Well.... no

Well.... no


Well.... Damn.. that was imminent. Iraq had loads and loads of nuclear arms. The country was known for this in certain circles. Anyways, Abdul's son (who was quite intelligent BTW and always wore glasses) created a special "WMD carrier" which would fly way up into the sky and land right in the middle of the US.

Why he chose to make vicious threats to blow the shit out of the US with his "WMD carrier" nobody really knows except the President of the US - and it's still a secret.

Anyways, the President of the US got to hear about Abdul thru his superior intelligence services and decided to kill a lot of Iraqi's because they must have been friends of Abdul.

The world - and the US is now safe and all people like Abdul are very frightened of the US and now have freedom and democracy.

End of history lesson.

Excuse me?? :winkwink:

Because the US experienced it's first "terrorist attack" and appears to have become very knowledgable on the subject - it may be worth commenting on other democratic countries who actually do have democracy as it is generally known worldwide.

ETA in Spain has existed since Roman Times in some form or other. You are prob right there - it sure does not happen overnight :winkwink:

The IRA did not need democracy to spread - they never even considered it but had another Guinness instead.

BTW... Why did the US support terrorist organisations in Ireland and openly have dinners and functions (including those at the Whitehouse) to raise money for terrorism?? Ah.. sorry.. that was for "freedom fighters". :)

After having read several of your posts in various threads I have come to realize that you are not very insightful and seem to be very misinformed in addition to not making much sense but I must assume that somehow you think differently or are just a trolling board whore.

Faggot please, linking the ETA to Rome is like linking Republicans in the US to Federalists.

Marxism didn't exist in Rome.

Stupid people that try to pretend they aren?t are funny.

Yes, Clinton was convicted of perjury - and then impeached.

HOWEVER

They were just digging for dirt and kept digging until Clinton fucked up. He answered a question about something that had nothing to do with the case on hand, and answered in a way that defended his marriage more than anything else.

I'm sorry; Perhaps it's because I'm a former Marine but I don't think anyone should be taking pot shots at the office of the President of the United States. The office needs to be respected at all costs, no matter whom or what group is in office.

This was a lie about nothing important. Granted, it was under oath. But he should never have had to answer such questions under oath.

you can refer to your constitution regarding the process

Faggot.. please... Can you learn at least something of the Basque movement before you even begin to equate it with remotely anything in US history.

Marxism???? No.. Marxism never did exist in Rome - least as far as I ever knew. Is this what you are saying?????

And a nice day to you - silly fuck.:thumbsup

Saddam ruled his country the same way the Gov. rules ours. With a strong Fist keep people in fear
The people who have the effrontery to rule us, who call themselves our government, understand this basic fact of human nature. They exploit it, and they cultivate it. Whether they compose a warfare state or a welfare state, they depend on it to secure popular submission, compliance with official dictates, and, on some occasions, affirmative cooperation with the state's enterprises and adventures. Without popular fear, no government could endure more than twenty-four hours. David Hume taught that all government rests on public opinion, but that opinion, I maintain, is not the bedrock of government. Public opinion itself rests on something deeper: fear

The (ETA) eskadi ta askatasuna is marxist you fucking dimwit. They were an offshoot of the basque nationalist party.
I hope lennin rapes you.

"Maybe I learned about the ones who rule the land behind a gun.
"Business, banks and bureaucrats sell your soul if they had a chance.
"Backed by money, trapped by greed, cut you down like you're a weed
"growing strong above the rest. Conform your self or lose your nest
"of comfort in society, a fascist form of democracy.
"tell us lies, we'll call it truth, condemn the poor and damn the lazy
"youth. Let us cut the noose."
Malcolm Mohil
"Skool"

It's kinda like that Roger, but improving! :winkwink:

You are 100% correct about the democracy side... got to be one of the most progressive democracies on the planet. But nothing it perfect as you prob know! :)

Hard to say till it happens, but smell the newly elected government may progress better and away from the traditional influence. A few ministers actually have relevant qualifications and experience - plus the new President, Oscar, has served before and already known for his ability both in and out of office.

Sheesh.. that is an awesome education.. looks like we are getting close at last.

Are you really just totally dumb or it just looks that way??

I'm not joking BTW!! :1orglaugh

Why quote my post and then refuse to answer any of the questions asked? Are you trying to avoid the issues raised in my post?

Have you heard of Hamas?

Iraq was a very stablizing force in the Middle East and you are seeing that now with Iran.

:thumbsup

It wouldn't do any good to impeach bush anyway because the damage has already been done. All it would achieve, is to make a statement on what American citizens think of incompetent leadership. Have you seen the approval ratings lately? Those already represent that fact.

Here's why impeachment is not the way to go: It costs a shitload of money (enough has been spent by bush dont you think?), it's too slow, it's a republican held house and senate so he wouldn't be convicted anyway (particularly since he hasn't broken any laws), and what sense does it make to put Dick-lesspieceofshit Cheney into office?

There an old saying that we get the government we deserve. Of course I don't derseve it, but unfortunatly. 60 million retards also have the right to vote.

There are principles involved SirMoby :)

The first principle is ignore all awkward questions.

The second principle is post some utter bullshit or one liner abuse as an answer to cover the fact that ya don't have a clue.

I'm still wondering if I can be educated on the change of policy from US support for terrorism in Ireland and why there is a problem with terrorism in the Middle East :)

Wait for it! :1orglaugh

The problem is the way the constitution is being defined. The president and his administration have found ways to interperate the constitition in a way that gives them a right to do what they want. Talk to other "scholars" and they say the constitution means something else. Unfortunetly scholars don't have the power or persuasian that the US government has.

And I may not be a scholar, but it doesn't take one to see that he has commited high crimes. There are a lot of things people know about him and his administration but they can't make progress in proving it. What about all those highly educated men and women that continue to talk how the Bush admin constently keeps them from saying certain truths to the media. The administration is a bunch of bully's and they don't want the American public knowing the truth about many things. They have so much power that they can control what people say and don't say.

If you don't think he has commited any crimes than I think you are just silly.

There is a difference between freedom fighters and terrorists. "Freedom fighters" is not just a catch phrase.

A freedom fighter is someone who is opposed to a forced government taking their soveriegn right to rule themselves. Their methods can be guerrila or unorthodox, similar to terrorist methods, but it is towards an end. Their reasoning and justification is articluted by their leaders and their goals are made clear. The IRA, and the militants attacking Allied troops in Iraq are examples. The militants attacking other civilians on Iraq are engaging in civil war.

Now look at Al Qeada for example. What is the end to their means? They are doing these acts in the name of God. They are extreme fundamentalists mis-interpreting religious dogma. It began with the takeover of Palestine, but that message was lost to these extremists long ago. Now they enact violence because they believe it is a calling from God.

Just my humble opinion, but I think they're dillusional.