Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2006, 12:52 AM   #1
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Can we stop members downloading multiple videos at once?

This is not spam and urgent.

We are becoming victims of our own success.

Some members are downloading lots of videos at the same time, from the content store, and this is slowing down the server. Is there a way to limit the number of videos a member can download at one time?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 12:57 AM   #2
CuriousToyBoy
Crazy Aussie Bastard
 
CuriousToyBoy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat, that's my home.
Posts: 16,787
Yes.

There is software to do that and ALSO speed limit user downloads and manage maximum daily downloads per user

But why wouldn't you load balance over multiple servers if you are that successful ?

Surely you want webmasters to buy more ?

2c
__________________
Celebs
Adult Who's Who ==> Ambush Interview ==> ICQ 293 070 684 ==> intmarpacrim AT gmail DOT com
CuriousToyBoy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 12:58 AM   #3
madawgz
8.8.8.8
 
madawgz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Noordermarkt
Posts: 30,509
try putting notes on the website, letting users know they should only download 1 video at a time

also, i think the maximum numbers of downloads in IE is 2... i might be wrong. in firefox you can do 10 at the same time.
__________________
TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.
madawgz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 12:59 AM   #4
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Sorry cocked up, it's from the paysite not the content store.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:02 AM   #5
CuriousToyBoy
Crazy Aussie Bastard
 
CuriousToyBoy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat, that's my home.
Posts: 16,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Sorry cocked up, it's from the paysite not the content store.
Same answer except cut the load balancing until absolutely necessary.

And you are better off capping download speed and per day limits.

Our average member ganks over 1gb per day - even with limiting.

It's a balancing act.

__________________
Celebs
Adult Who's Who ==> Ambush Interview ==> ICQ 293 070 684 ==> intmarpacrim AT gmail DOT com
CuriousToyBoy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:04 AM   #6
okdesign
ICQ 278367136
 
okdesign's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 24,772
That is not good idea!
okdesign is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:08 AM   #7
Jace
FBOP Class Of 2013
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
you can set your server to only allow 2 simultaneous downloads from the same ip, ask your host about it
Jace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:12 AM   #8
acctman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,840
check on hotscripts.com or get a really good php/mysql coder to create a script that allows connection for downloading per ip
acctman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:45 AM   #9
darksoul
Confirmed User
 
darksoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: /root/
Posts: 4,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by acctman
check on hotscripts.com or get a really good php/mysql coder to create a script that allows connection for downloading per ip
lol, get a clue.
__________________
1337 5y54|)m1n: 157717888
BM-2cUBw4B2fgiYAfjkE7JvWaJMiUXD96n9tN
Cambooth
darksoul is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 01:57 AM   #10
PatrickM
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 772
Running a paysite is not rocket science


PatrickM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 02:25 AM   #11
Alky
Confirmed User
 
Alky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by madawgz
try putting notes on the website, letting users know they should only download 1 video at a time

also, i think the maximum numbers of downloads in IE is 2... i might be wrong. in firefox you can do 10 at the same time.
it has nothing to do with IE or firefox... it's server settings.
Alky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 02:43 AM   #12
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alky
it has nothing to do with IE or firefox... it's server settings.
i think he was trying to point out that most users are limited by their browser settings not the server settings.. very few servers allow less than 2 ( the average limit for the average user in i.e. )

In this case its most likely people scraping the content to sell it on guba or etc..
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:00 AM   #13
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alky
it has nothing to do with IE or firefox... it's server settings.
Well, not necessarily.
As Smokey said, there are other factors.
IE is restricted in the registry to 2 simultaneous downloads from the server.
You CAN increase over this, but it actually breaks RFC's (Doesn't stop you, just a btw)

If you're running apache, you can certainly limit the number of concurrent downloads per user / IP
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:07 AM   #14
Gungadin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: O&A PARTY ROCK
Posts: 444
I've used "limitipconn" before - it's an apache module that you drop onto your box and then load in the httpd.conf... any fairly savvy admin should be able to set this up for you.

Here's a quick article about it:

http://www.webhostgear.com/279.html
Gungadin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:13 AM   #15
Lord Aga
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 479
Here you go paul http://www.trafficwize.com/

You or your host should be able to install this in no time
Lord Aga is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:18 AM   #16
HairToStay
Confirmed User
 
HairToStay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southcoast, Mass.
Posts: 1,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickM
Running a paysite is not rocket science



LOLOL! First thing I thought of!

Why limit your users to what they have paid for??? Upgrade your server. They pay for everything there is in the members' area, not "gee, you can have 2 videos a day or come back tomorrow."
__________________
Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature!
HairToStay is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:23 AM   #17
Manowar
jellyfish  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickM
Running a paysite is not rocket science


Manowar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:29 AM   #18
DutchTeenCash
I like Dutch Girls
 
DutchTeenCash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dutchteencash.com
Posts: 21,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickM
Running a paysite is not rocket science


funny
DutchTeenCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:45 AM   #19
u-Bob
there's no $$$ in porn
 
u-Bob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
if you're talking about the content store (not a pay site):
- set up an ftp server
- when a user buys a set, have the system copy that set to the users ftp dir.
- limit one or 2 FTP logins per IP (or better: per account).
u-Bob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:46 AM   #20
DutchTeenCash
I like Dutch Girls
 
DutchTeenCash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dutchteencash.com
Posts: 21,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob
if you're talking about the content store (not a pay site):
- set up an ftp server
- when a user buys a set, have the system copy that set to the users ftp dir.
- limit one or 2 FTP logins per IP (or better: per account).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Sorry cocked up, it's from the paysite not the content store.
riiiiiiiiiight
DutchTeenCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 04:39 AM   #21
Dennis69
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by HairToStay
LOLOL! First thing I thought of!

Why limit your users to what they have paid for??? Upgrade your server. They pay for everything there is in the members' area, not "gee, you can have 2 videos a day or come back tomorrow."
Agreed... they already payed to play, now you have to set it up so they can
__________________
HaHaHa
Dennis69 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 04:40 AM   #22
Manowar
jellyfish  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by HairToStay
LOLOL! First thing I thought of!

Why limit your users to what they have paid for??? Upgrade your server. They pay for everything there is in the members' area, not "gee, you can have 2 videos a day or come back tomorrow."
Totally. No limiting should be in place. It will piss off members.
Manowar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 05:07 AM   #23
lickmymonster
Confirmed User
 
lickmymonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ****Houston ***
Posts: 628
lickmymonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 05:55 AM   #24
Bansheelinks
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manowar
Totally. No limiting should be in place. It will piss off members.
However, some will sitesuck no matter what, and try and DL absolutely everything. Cut those off at the knees.
Bansheelinks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 05:59 AM   #25
Tam
Confirmed User
 
Tam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In your face
Posts: 8,488
I don't really see why you would want them to be on a leash when they join to be honest with you. They paid for full, 100% access to the paysite and they should have just that. Sure WE don't want them to go in and download it all and leave, but you know? That's the price you pay and if they like you, they are going to stay whether they download them all today or over 30 days.

BUT when you go telling them how and what they can have or limit them, then they aren't getting the 100% access you promise them when they signup. Give them what the paid for and what you told them they would get. If you want to limit them, then tell them on the tour that what they are getting is 50% access, or access to one movie a day......... we don't want to do that, right? So give them what you are telling them you are.
Tam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 09:08 AM   #26
directfiesta
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
directfiesta's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 29,680
First, stop the auto-downloaders.,.. they are the real killer.

In yout htaccess file ( maybe some new ones to add ... ):

Quote:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebZIP.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Iria.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Stripper.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Offline.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Copier.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Crawler.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Snagger.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Teleport.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Reaper.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Wget.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Grabber.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Sucker.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Downloader.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Siphon.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Collector.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Mag-Net.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Widow.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Pockey.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*DA.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Snake.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*BackWeb.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*gotit.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Vacuum.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*SmartDownload.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Pump.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*HMView.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Ninja.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*HTTrack.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*JOC.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*likse.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Memo.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*pcBrowser.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*SuperBot.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*leech.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Mirror.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Recorder.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*GrabNet.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Likse.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Navroad.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*attach.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Magnet.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Surfbot.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Bandit.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Ants.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Buddy.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Whacker.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*DISCoPump.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Drip.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*EirGrabber.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*ExtractorPro.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*EyeNetIE.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*FlashGet.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*GetRight.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Gets.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Go!Zilla.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Go-Ahead-Got-It.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Grafula.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*IBrowse.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*InterGET.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*InternetNinja.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*JetCar.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*JustView.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*MIDownool.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*MisterPiX.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*NearSite.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*NetSpider.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*OfflineExplorer.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*PageGrabber.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*PapaFoto.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Pockey.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*ReGet.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Slurp.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*SpaceBison.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*SuperHTTP.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Teleport.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebAuto.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebCopier.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebFetch.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebReaper.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebSauger.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebStripper.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebWhacker.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebZIP.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebImageCollector.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*WebSucker.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Webster.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*Wget.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*eCatch.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*ia_archiver.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*lftp.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*tAkeOut.*$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*FileHound.*$
RewriteRule /*$ http://www.yourdomain.com/noauto.htm [L,R]
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
directfiesta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 09:15 AM   #27
pstation
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,135
Check out http://www.snert.com/Software/mod_throttle/

It's able to do *exactly* what you need and more
pstation is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 09:22 AM   #28
Manowar
jellyfish  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta
First, stop the auto-downloaders.,.. they are the real killer.

In yout htaccess file ( maybe some new ones to add ... ):
Thanks bro
Manowar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 10:16 AM   #29
jayeff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tam
I don't really see why you would want them to be on a leash when they join to be honest with you. They paid for full, 100% access to the paysite and they should have just that.
Which is all very warm and cuddly, but not very realistic and nothing whatever to do with business.

There are obviously other factors, but in this context the relevant ones are content costs, bandwidth costs and the cost of hardware/connectivity.

The average surfer will visit your site x times a month and download a certain amount of content. He is nothing like those who join sites simply to rip all of their content.

Not only do that latter group up your bandwidth bills (and perhaps force you to consider more sophisticated, more expensive hosting options), but since they download more content than they can possibly watch in a reasonable period, how likely is it they will renew? If you keep uploading fresh content (far more than Mr Average needs, but hoping to keep the rippers renewing) your content costs will go through the roof.

So in the real world, you can either price your memberships to accomodate the site rippers, but doing that would mean a price probably high enough to deter most of them along with the vast majority of regular surfers. Or you can price for the average member and then, if you want to make a profit, you don't have a choice except to restrict those who go beyond the usage you planned for.

All other things being equal, it should be possible to set limits high enough they will never interfere with the majority of members. But why should they, in effect, be forced to pay extra for a site so that it can accomodate people who play silly buggers?
jayeff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 10:09 PM   #30
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta
First, stop the auto-downloaders.,.. they are the real killer.

In yout htaccess file ( maybe some new ones to add ... ):
Thanks for the advice, we think it could be the auto downloaders.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 10:27 PM   #31
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayeff
Which is all very warm and cuddly, but not very realistic and nothing whatever to do with business.

There are obviously other factors, but in this context the relevant ones are content costs, bandwidth costs and the cost of hardware/connectivity.

The average surfer will visit your site x times a month and download a certain amount of content. He is nothing like those who join sites simply to rip all of their content.

Not only do that latter group up your bandwidth bills (and perhaps force you to consider more sophisticated, more expensive hosting options), but since they download more content than they can possibly watch in a reasonable period, how likely is it they will renew? If you keep uploading fresh content (far more than Mr Average needs, but hoping to keep the rippers renewing) your content costs will go through the roof.

So in the real world, you can either price your memberships to accomodate the site rippers, but doing that would mean a price probably high enough to deter most of them along with the vast majority of regular surfers. Or you can price for the average member and then, if you want to make a profit, you don't have a choice except to restrict those who go beyond the usage you planned for.

All other things being equal, it should be possible to set limits high enough they will never interfere with the majority of members. But why should they, in effect, be forced to pay extra for a site so that it can accomodate people who play silly buggers?
Good reply.

Keeping the balance between what is profitable/feasible and giving the surfer a good deal is hard.

The problem could be we are giving them too many movies at too high quality, for the hardware to accommodate, plus the BW bill. We are still running on the one server and this will change next week. It's a good one, but at max, the new one will be dedicated to the paysite.

The last few days we have run at 200% of the normal BW. The problem is not the bill, it's the way it slows down the admin centre. What we have to do is discover what is causing it. We have password protection but I don't think it's good enough, we will improve it.

The main problem is the way this makes the admin centre slow down to a speed that makes the administration of the site cumbersome. The sites run well, until someone tries to order something, then the problem appears. The paysite runs fine, if a bit slow.

As I said we will fix it and look at how to work in the future.

Just had to happen a few days after I said running a paysite is not rocket science. It's a bit harder then I thought.

The point of Jayeff's post is about the amount of content some sites offer and the membership. Does $1 a day allow you to download 200 GIGS in a few days?

Last edited by Paul Markham; 04-14-2006 at 10:30 PM..
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.