Celeron D 346 3.0 GHZ & 533mhz FSB or AMD 3100 1.8 GHZ & 1500MHZ FSB? - GoFuckYourself.com

chadglni · 04-14-2006, 07:46 AM

Which one is faster?

chadglni · 04-14-2006, 08:06 AM

Anybody?

infecto · 04-14-2006, 08:12 AM

huh since when does it run on a 1.5ghz fsb?

infecto · 04-14-2006, 08:18 AM

oh and I am assuming you mean a sempron 3100? If so technically speaking the sempron should be a step up from the celeron. The sempron line is supposed to be match naming with the celeron line.

chadglni · 04-14-2006, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infecto

oh and I am assuming you mean a sempron 3100? If so technically speaking the sempron should be a step up from the celeron. The sempron line is supposed to be match naming with the celeron line.

I think that should be 1600.

chadglni · 04-14-2006, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infecto

oh and I am assuming you mean a sempron 3100? If so technically speaking the sempron should be a step up from the celeron. The sempron line is supposed to be match naming with the celeron line.

Even though it's 1.8GHz vs 3.0? I hated Celeron years ago but I "heard" they were better now. It's between that and an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ with 2000MHz fsb.

HorseShit · 04-14-2006, 08:25 AM

They call it 3100+ because it's an equivalent of a 3.1 GHz processor.. must mean something they can achieve that out of only a 1.8 GHz clock speed. Go with AMD.

sandman! · 04-14-2006, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

Even though it's 1.8GHz vs 3.0? I hated Celeron years ago but I "heard" they were better now. It's between that and an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ with 2000MHz fsb.

a 3500+ will kill an 3ghz celeron

chadglni · 04-14-2006, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman!

a 3500+ will kill an 3ghz celeron

Decision made then, only $180 more with a monitor and photo printer. Thanks everyone.

pornguy · 04-14-2006, 08:53 AM

I have always heard that the AMD is the better one.

Brad Mitchell · 04-14-2006, 09:02 AM

The AMD Athlon 64 3500+ is the better system. If you are building your system, check out http://www.newegg.com for the components, they are the fastest and the cheapest. You would be surprised, you can get a great P4 processor for $200 or less.

Brad

04-14-2006, 07:46 AM	#1
chadglni Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: PEI, Canada Posts: 6,924	Celeron D 346 3.0 GHZ & 533mhz FSB or AMD 3100 1.8 GHZ & 1500MHZ FSB? Which one is faster? __________________ Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

04-14-2006, 08:06 AM	#2
chadglni Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: PEI, Canada Posts: 6,924	Anybody? __________________ Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

04-14-2006, 08:53 AM	#10
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	I have always heard that the AMD is the better one. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

04-14-2006, 09:02 AM	#11
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,813	The AMD Athlon 64 3500+ is the better system. If you are building your system, check out http://www.newegg.com for the components, they are the fastest and the cheapest. You would be surprised, you can get a great P4 processor for $200 or less. Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999

04-14-2006, 08:12 AM	#3
infecto Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,697	huh since when does it run on a 1.5ghz fsb?

04-14-2006, 08:18 AM	#4
infecto Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,697	oh and I am assuming you mean a sempron 3100? If so technically speaking the sempron should be a step up from the celeron. The sempron line is supposed to be match naming with the celeron line.

04-14-2006, 08:25 AM	#7
HorseShit Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 17,513	They call it 3100+ because it's an equivalent of a 3.1 GHz processor.. must mean something they can achieve that out of only a 1.8 GHz clock speed. Go with AMD.