|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
there's no $$$ in porn
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
|
'Jesus Loves Porn Stars' bible nixed
U.S. Bible printers are rejecting a special printing for a ministry trying to sway the pornography industry with the slogan: "Jesus Loves Porn Stars."
Pastors Mike Foster and Craig Gross, founders of *********.com, say the brand name would further their work. They regularly pass out thousands of copies of the New Testament at conferences, trying to persuade participants to switch from porn to Jesus, The Los Angeles Times reports. Foster and Gross say the church needs to use new ways of reaching its flock, including avenues that may be shocking. *********.com paid the American Bible Society to print 10,000 bibles with the "Jesus Loves" slogan, but the printer won't do it. In a letter to Foster and Gross the organization calls it "misleading and inappropriate for a New Testament." http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.ph...2-073454-3637r |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,527
|
a funny parody to The Da Vinci Code
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA land of the oppressed
Posts: 724
|
they are refusing to do a paid for job, Now I dont know, but is there the slightest chance this would be a discrimitory case if it was pushed? Just wondering.
|
|
|
|