http://thepantyhunter.com/feed/

Here's a nice one. Not very well written, but it'll do.

Vaseline.

ABP is distributed as a collectioin of module for WordPress. WordPress is included for your convenience during installation,

Would you like the link to get the source code for WordPress? You can use SubVersion to grab it.

:thumbsup

The purpose of RSS doesn't change whether it's a description only feed or full content feed. If it's made available, the intent on the part of the RSS owner is for it to be syndicated.
This is not content theft.

It's free traffic to whomever is syndicated. One of my ABP demo sites gets 1000+ uniques a day, would you mind me syndicating your site, and giving you some free traffic?

Some people can't see that RSS is a benefit for everyone. I would love for a bunch of people to syndicate my blogs. You do realize how much weblogsinc sold for right?

A huge part of the reason for the $ spent is the amount of syndicating/traffic going on with them.

Well, I'm sure as shit going to syndicate his site! The men in those panties are HOT! Nice hard cocks filling out those silky layers!

Of course, content theft is the recourse for the feeble minded like you, who are unable to make a living using their own brain. Now I know why you are on here trying to pimp this software.

You are too pathetic to even make money off stealing content.

Give me a second, I'm jerking off to your blog.

Then, I'm going to syndicate it, and jerk off to it on my OWN sites.

Publishing the entire content of the site using RSS is like me sucking all the pictures from a paysite, leaving the watermark on, adding my own advertising and then saying to the content producer, wtf are you whining about, I am giving you free advertising.

This same argument has been going on with a lot of the paysite owners here who are pissed as hell for sites like Guba publishing all their content. Based on your theory, they should be happy, right?

If people were to take one or two stories, or even excerpts of stories that they find interesting, that is fine. But, republishing my entire site on another site is theft. And RSS is for visitors to my site, not for some unscrupulous webmaster who has the brains of a flea and can't put two sentences together to use my content and make money off it.

You're right, there is a difference between a few line excerpts with a link to the full article at the original website & using the entire article without giving any credit or link back. Fortunately, this is easy to remedy when you create your RSS feed. Wordpress, Blogger etc. all have the option of choosing to syndicate a portion or the full post. You can also add footer information with another link to your site, copyright info & so on.

I think the problem with the RSS-to-splog programs is giving the user the ability to change the original RSS feed to swap out links (like a poker site that uses syndicated content & changes all original referrer links to his own).

how do you mean it borrows it (content)? not stealing it? these kind of scripts confused me. esp. rss2blog. i've seen the demo video and still not get it. LOL :helpme

You know that you can turn off the syndication of your content, right?

You're like the guy giving out free cookie samples, then bitching when no one buys the real thing.

Disable your feed, put a notice not to syndicate it (which would only apply in the future, of course) cry more, or shut the fuck up. I predict you will choose "cry more," but please surprise me.

ICQ me for a live demo, I think you'll understand better. That video is all kinds of confusing.

This is what I was saying a few posts back. If I caught another webmaster stealing something that I had written and putting his links in it...I would be sooo fucking pissed! Not only is it bullshit...it's plagarism. That would be like me copying the Declaraction of Independence, changing a few sentances, and saying I wrote it.

Talk to jdr, the owner of Fets.com. He's made thousands of sales from people doing just that. On the newsgroups, on their own sites, all over the place.

I'd love if someone stole all of my watermarked content.

You can turn off attribution to your original source very easily, when you grab an XML feed.

The difference between using RSS and taking content from a Paysite is simple, though: the paysite is NOT syndicating their content. Syndication is specifically FOR people to use your content, and give you a link back. You either publish a snippet, or you publish the whole thing.

The "brain of a flea," I think, belongs to the people who PUBLISH THEIR ENTIRE SITE FOR SYNDICATION, then cry when people syndicate it.

Why should I inconvenience my surfers? Some bloggers have gone to summary feeds and their readers have requested that they switch back to full feeds.

My RSS feed is not there for you to steal and serve your own advertising. Theif.

Clearly, he'd MUCH rather just whine about it. I can smell this type from a mile away, and they're the same ones standing in the soup kitchen line at the end of the month, crying about how hard it is to earn money.

Only if the Declaration of Independence A) wasn't syndicated through RSS, B) had a copyright asking you NOT to use it, and C) wasn't attributed (which all of our content IS .. we give full credit AND a link to where it came from, helping their SEO and sending them traffic).

First of all, "your" surfers come partially from ABP sites syndicating your content. Second of all, if you don't want your content used, simply post a notice that it is not to be used for syndication to other blogs. That is your recourse. Crying, instead, is what you've chosen to do.

100 bloggers and whiners. Sig placement!

Hmm.. maybe I should learn to steal other people's content and pretend it is my own. Will that make me rich like you?

Or will I still have to spend my time spamming adult webmaster boards trying to hawk $200 software?

yaddi yaddi yadda

No see, we syndicate our content so that our readers can read our posts easier....we syndicate our content so that legitimate sites like www.justwantfuck.com can syndicate our content with our links in it to a larger audience...not for some dumb fuck who can't be bothered to write his own content or cut his own thumbnails to steal, change the links in, and try to pass off as his own.

Now, type one of your witty little replies and tell me I just don't understand...but trust me, after two days of this tread...I do understand. You'd rather steal the work of others than try to do something yourself. :321GFY

Shit man, I've sold 11 of these things since 1am (early this morning). Thanks for all the bumps and everything, and thanks to everyone who has bought a copy or tried a demo!

Ok, here it is:

Post a notice asking people not to do what RSS is designed to do: syndicate your content.

It's not rocket science, but then again .. strap me in, cowboy! Let's blast off!

Keep it bumpin', baby, you're doing fine.

The software does not allow changing any links. The linking system will only create links from unlinked words or phrases.

Clearly.

Amusing, to say the least, how rumors start.

Our software gives credit on every article to the source whether snippet, or full feed, and also will not change existing links.

OK, here is a little plugin for you blog owners that don't want thieves like edgeprod making money off your content.

It will insert a copyright notice into all your full feeds specifying that it is for non-commercial use only.

http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/a...-atom-feeds/1/

So, it will copy the post with MY affiliate links? What about the pictures which have my afflilate codes in the link?

That's a great resource. Anyone who doesn't want their content syndicated to AutoBlogger Pro sites should *definitely* put that notice up.

However, remember that many times, no one looks at your feed itself, so make sure you put it somewhere VERY obvious.

Understand that NO ONE that I know is interested in "stealing" anyone's content. If someone posts that they don't want it taken, we definitely want to comply with that! So PLEASE make a nice, bold notice if this is the case.

I don't know if I trust a link from someone slimy like MrLuvr, but when I get done jerking off to the men in panties on his site, I might just have to make a tutorial on adding a notice like this to your own blog.

FYI: thanks for all the bumps. just did another live demo.

If you syndicate it with your links, yes, I'd keep them. That's what syndication is all about -- I am giving you FREE promotion, FREE hardlinks for SEO, and FREE clicks to your sponsors. You'd be a fool to yell at me for it, but yet .. it happens!

I would always honor your affiliate links. You're so hostile about it, you never really took the time to learn.

Don't worry, it's a common misconception.

Actually, the text of the Declaration is in the public domain so you could probably make a derivative work. Or use it as a basis to a movie without violating copyright or paying a royalty.

Mmmm hmmmm.

But they don't want to let the truth get in the way of a lousy comparison.

While trying to decide between AutoBlogger and RSS2Blog edgeprod gave me a live walkthrough and let me play around with the features of AutoBlogger - I'm going to have to admit it was very easy to use as well as very customizable if I wished to do so. Good stuff from these guys.

:winkwink: :thumbsup

Thanks much, I appreciate the props.

Make sure you check out RSS2Blog before making any buying decisions, just so you can be sure you get the product that's right for you and not just the one you saw first.

:)

Hey you.

God, could your website get any hotter? Hurry up and let me promote it before everyone else has your galleries all over the web. Hehe.

I had already checked it beforehand - for what I need, AutoBlogger is the software of choice.

That's the conclusion I came to, also. I appreciate you saying it.

I just want to make it clear that the guys at RSS2Blog have a product, too, and we have nothing against it, despite what might be tossed our way.