.XXX Passed Get Ready For the Ghetto.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • woj
    <&(©¿©)&>
    • Jul 2002
    • 47882

    #51
    50 .xxx domains
    Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
    Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
    Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

    Comment

    • Hollywood376
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2005
      • 1154

      #52
      Originally posted by bellskids
      Shame on those here who voted Republican.

      0.02
      The guys who introduced the bill are democrats, not republicans.

      ICQ 251796771

      Comment

      • fetishblog
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2005
        • 5995

        #53
        Fuck them. I'll stick with my nice .com.

        Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!

        Comment

        • Webby
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Oct 2002
          • 14956

          #54
          Originally posted by sarah_webinc
          I just figured it would be easier to go after people that violated the .kids rules than to try to go through the entire internet and try to deal with any site that isn't on .xxx .
          Sure it is, and a .kids TLD is an obvious candidate, - more so than trying to get the adult biz into .XXX domains.

          There is probably more content on the net which may be unsuitable for children than that within current adult sites. A .kids TLD would at least give an option to responsible parents to manage the surfing habits of their children. Parents utilizing that option may be another matter.

          The .kids domains will then be a target for pedo predators, - it's almost a paradise for them, - but, as you said, there is more chance of monitoring .kids domains from a law angle than trying to cover the whole of the net.

          Only my but bottom line is if anyone has an interest in protecting children in any genuine sense, - the problem is far more deep-rooted than issues over TLD's on the net.

          It starts at home with parents having control of their own kids and being aware as to whether they are drinking safe water or accessing porn on the net.

          It is also these same parents, and family members, who are first in line on the abuse scenario. There have been several reports over the last few years which suggest around 25% - 35% of children will, or have been abused during their childhood years. If true, and there is little reason to doubt it, - this is stunning shit, - not only because of the percentages, but the fact that there is more likely a chance that those abused will become the abusers/pedos/predators of the future. It's a vicious circle and simple math suggest it's going to be an increasing problem in societies. Parents sure need to be more "aware" and take the upper hand monitoring their children.

          No government on this planet can successfully manage internet content - claims otherwise are a joke. Even managing one element such as a .kids TLD needs substantial cash and resources together with constant communication with all agencies who have something to offer in playing a role. Without this, it's no better than the no child left behind farce.
          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

          Comment

          • mazdaman
            My Sig was too Big! :(
            • Apr 2006
            • 435

            #55
            in 20 years time the internet will be as protected as fort knox 0.02
            FAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
            GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
            GGGGG

            Comment

            Working...